Date: 2004-12-05T22:06:42
Editor: DakotaJack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsState
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsState
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
Da
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
I buy into what Ted said on legality/reality. The reality is that if
anyone -1's anything then they have to justify why, whether they're a PMC
member or not - if someone puts forward good reasons for a -1 then they're
not going to be ignored. On the other side of the coin the more people that
+1 a
Good stuff :-) Thanks Ted and Niall for the clarification. My apologies,
again, if I came off as being obtuse. I just wasn't seeing it. Niall's
message helped, and I really apprecite your note fleshing things out, Ted.
Eddie
- Original Message -
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As always, everyone is invited to vote on everything. :)
The website is still a little out of synch with what has been decided on the
dev list. Right now, the best reference for the release process is the Release
Checklist.
* http://struts.apache.org/release-checklist.html
This document obsole
By the way, the HotDeployObjectServer can be made generic for all
classes with the new Tiger JVM classes. This means that hot deploy
will require in HaD only one extra class, viz. the wrapper class
com.crackwillow.deploy.Point, which perhaps should be called
com.crackwillow.deploy.PointWrapper or
Those on the dev list whom have been secretly corresponding with me
about HaD and Struts 2.0 hot deploy can find the latest at
http://131.191.32.112:8080/hot_deploy.zip. I have discovered that the
solution is essentially a much more lightweight version of JMX MLet
for hot deploy widely used in var
