When I see OGNL classes in exceptions stack trace, I believe it is not as fast
as 2+2.
But I have never thought to replace ww:property tags with %= % scriplets.
ww:property performance is enough for me, for now.
WebWork form tags could be really slow. After I have moved templates out of
+1 (GA) too
Herrera
Nate Drake wrote:
+1 (GA)
On 3/23/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's not an actual drop-dead date. Like merit, quality votes never
expire.
The 72-hour clause just means that if we had 3 +1s by then, and
nothing seemed awry, we might go ahead
To avoid such long threads in future, probably it makes sense to add some
performance
benchmark page in struts examples distribution.
Would it be possible to contribute the test page you've already
started? We have a ticket open.
* https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1560
I'm also
From the performance tuning page:
Copy the /template directory from the Struts 2 jar in your WEB_APP root.
Freemarker fails to properly cache templates when they are retrieved from the
classpath. Copying them to the WEB_APP root allows Freemarker to cache them
correctly. Freemarker looks at
I wrote a struts2 caching implementation of the freemarker templates:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1661
Freemarker wouldn't know how to cache the templates as well as struts2
does since we know how the templates are being used and whether or not
it is safe to cache them.
Tom
Any reason why this shouldn't be applied on the 2.0 branch instead of 2.1?
musachy
On 3/24/07, Tom Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote a struts2 caching implementation of the freemarker templates:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1661
Freemarker wouldn't know how to cache
Is it just me or is surefire not a bit strange on the xwork project?
Could you try this:
mvn clean
mvn surefire-report:report
And then look in target/site/surefire-report.html. Then click on the first test
- ActionContextTest.
It should have only 8 tests. but the list is much bigger on my
Well, there is a small risk of things being cached and a developer
relying on the behavior of not caching the templates. However, I think
those cases will be rare and it would benefit many people.
Tom
Musachy Barroso wrote:
Any reason why this shouldn't be applied on the 2.0 branch instead of
We could enable the cache when devMode is false.
musachy
On 3/24/07, Tom Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, there is a small risk of things being cached and a developer
relying on the behavior of not caching the templates. However, I think
those cases will be rare and it would benefit
Damm surefire seems to be a bit buggy. Just browsed it's JIRA.
Created a minor bug: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-312
-
Posted via Jive Forums
As I believe the Ajax/Dojo plugin is ready, if we could mop-up the
portlet plugin ticket, we could apply the caching patch to the HEAD,
and get started on the 2.1.x series.
Having AJAX as a plugin rather than a theme will also benefit many people :)
-Ted.
On 3/24/07, Tom Schneider [EMAIL
Yeah, I still need to confirm nothing is broken in core, except the tooltips
which I know are not working. By the way Dojo 0.4.2 was released, how was
the upgrade made last time? Drop the dojo files and add the new ones?
musachy
On 3/24/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I believe the
When I run it, here's what's in my ActionContextTest.txt
---
Test set: com.opensymphony.xwork2.ActionContextTest
---
Tests run: 8,
Addicted to porn? Help Yourself, with out risk of embarrassment. Affordable, No
software for people to see. Keep your same Internet provider. No text based
filtering to interfere.
http://www.safefromsites.com/help.html
Life is like a video game.
Where you start, the characters you will meet,
14 matches
Mail list logo
