2007/6/7, Rainer Hermanns [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Wendy,
thanks for reminding me,... Just called the vote :)
Ok, I change my vote to +1 to GA (non binding), since the call for
struts-annotations vote has been done.
Sorry for any incovenience this may cause :-)
Antonio
2007/6/10, Paul Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* The TLP address exists but it is not listed on Apache home page
Thanks Paul, but how can it be corrected? Is there a repository for Apache
home page?
* http://struts.apache.org/struts-sandbox/tiles/ is what I find in a
google search for Tiles
Here is my +1 for GA.
-Rainer
Struts Annotations 1.0.2 has been tagged and is available for testing
in the following Maven repository:
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations-1.0.2/m2-
staging-repository/
To test this build, temporarily add a repository to pom.xml or
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] General Availability (GA)
I am using this build in 2 inhouse projects without problems.
So I think it's time for going GA as well.
cheers,
Rainer
--
Rainer Hermanns
aixcept
Neupforte 16
52062 Aachen - Germany
w:
Here are the results of the vote for going GA with the Struts
Annotations release 1.0.2
Binding:
+1 Don Brown (binding)
+1 Rene Gielen (binding)
+1 Rainer Hermanns (binding)
+0 Ian Roughley (binding)
Non Binding:
+1 Musachy Barroso
+1 Antonio Petrelli
I'll post an announcement as soon as the
Here are the results of the vote:
+1 GA Ian Roughley (binding), Don Brown (binding), James Mitchell
(binding), Rene Gielen (binding), Rainer Hermanns (binding)
+1 GA Pedro Herrera (non binding), Matt Raible (non binding), Antonio
Petrelli (non binding)
Thanks for your votes, I'll post the
This is a really minor thing, but it gets me all the time, the set tag uses
the name attribute for the variable name, while the url, and bean tags use
id, anybody against deprecating the name attribute in set and using id
instead?
regards
musachy
--
Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?
I have finally been able to extract the portlet code into a plugin,
but it required some shortcuts due to couplings between the
Components (URL, Form and it's super classes) and generating the URLs.
But at least all tests pass, and there are no more dependencies to the
portlet API in the core. I
On 6/6/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/3/07, Paul Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My hands are full with two jobs at the moment. I can roll the 1.3.9
release because Maven is easy, but I'd like someone to help out with
these pre-tasks, if anyone is available:
* Checkin
From a S2 user perspective the consistency would be appreciated (understanding
I'd likely have to do a search and replace in my JSPs sooner or later).
- Original Message
From: Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007
Thanks for the feedback. I logged:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1981
if nobody is against it I will deprecate name and start using id instead.
musachy
On 6/11/07, Jon Wilmoth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From a S2 user perspective the consistency would be appreciated
+1
I still have to look up S1 tag syntax; I'd hate to
have to play that game w/ S2 :)
--- Jon Wilmoth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From a S2 user perspective the consistency would be
appreciated (understanding I'd likely have to do a
search and replace in my JSPs sooner or later).
-
On 5/3/07, Paul Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Test the webapps
Blank: GOOD.
Cookbook: GOOD.
EL-Examples:
html-el:multibox. When first started, none of the checkboxes were
selected. Also, the '50' on the right hand side is not selectable due
to the 'disabled=${!empty pageScope}'. Bit of
On 6/11/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/3/07, Paul Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Test the webapps
EL-Examples:
Digging more into the major issues:
html-el:multibox. When first started, none of the checkboxes were selected.
Looks to me like the text is plain wrong.
The main website has been updated.
I am +1 with the redirect -- a permanent one too.
Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nils,
This is a great start. I had wanted to do this myself, but I never
found the time. I only took a brief look at the patch, but a few things
jumped out at me:
1. I'm not sure the UrlRendererFactory is needed. I believe the whole
purpose of guice is to not have anymore factories
Thanks for the feedback!
On 6/12/07, Tom Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. I'm not sure the UrlRendererFactory is needed. I believe the whole
purpose of guice is to not have anymore factories anymore, so guice
should just inject the necessary UrlRenderer. (especially if they are
17 matches
Mail list logo
