Re: Deprecate 2.1 version

+1 for René's version schema. But should we really rename the packages to org.apache.struts3? This breaks definitifly all external plugins. We should not put the Version Numer into the package names. What is the Brand of Struts 3? Struts? So we should use org.apache.struts again for the package

Build failed in Jenkins: Struts3 #4

See Changes: [lukaszlenart] WW-3714 renames org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2 -- [...truncated 6248 lines...] [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.3:install (default-install) @ struts2-arc

Build failed in Jenkins: Struts3 » XWork: Core #4

See Changes: [lukaszlenart] WW-3714 renames org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2 -- [INFO] Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/p

Re: [jira] [Created] (WW-3714) Rename org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2

*sigh* Good! For a moment I was really scared there would have been such commit already once I read the mail - breaking API changes should under all circumstances happen in new major releases, and they need upfront communication to our user community, as well as tool providers such as IDEA (Yann C

Build failed in Jenkins: Struts3 #3

See Changes: [lukaszlenart] WW-3714 renames org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2 - part 2 -- [...truncated 587 lines...] [JENKINS] Archiving

Build failed in Jenkins: Struts3 » XWork: Core #3

See Changes: [lukaszlenart] WW-3714 renames org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2 - part 2 -- [INFO] Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apach

Build failed in Jenkins: Struts3 #2

See Changes: [lukaszlenart] WW-3714 renames org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2 - part 1 -- [...truncated 1124 lines...] [JENKINS] Archiving

Build failed in Jenkins: Struts3 » XWork: Core #2

See Changes: [lukaszlenart] WW-3714 renames org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2 - part 1 -- [INFO] Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apach

Re: [jira] [Created] (WW-3714) Rename org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2

I've setup a new build of Struts3 https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Struts/job/Struts3/ Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ - To unsubscri

Re: [jira] [Created] (WW-3714) Rename org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2

2011/11/30 Maurizio Cucchiara : > Yes, I know (I have already updated that page :)) > Were you asking to add the svn details on that page? Yes, details about where the development of S3 happens ;-) Thanks in advance -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference -

Re: [jira] [Created] (WW-3714) Rename org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2

Yes, I know (I have already updated that page :)) Were you asking to add the svn details on that page? Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin:http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara Maurizio Cucchiara 2011/11/

Re: [jira] [Created] (WW-3714) Rename org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2

2011/11/30 Maurizio Cucchiara : >> Ok, will try. Could you update wiki as well ? > > Do you mean adding svn details/instructions? I've created a wiki page regarding S3 here [1], I'd like to keep any important information on that page for now, before we'll request a new space on Confluence [1] htt

Re: [jira] [Created] (WW-3714) Rename org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2

> > Ok, will try. Could you update wiki as well ? Do you mean adding svn details/instructions? Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin:http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara Maurizio Cucchiara

Re: [jira] [Created] (WW-3714) Rename org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2

2011/11/30 Maurizio Cucchiara : > Hi Lukasz, > I have just added a new 3.x branch based on the current trunk, what about to > apply your patch on that? Ok, will try. Could you update wiki as well ? Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura

Re: [jira] [Created] (WW-3714) Rename org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2

Hi Lukasz, I have just added a new 3.x branch based on the current trunk, what about to apply your patch on that? Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin:http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara Maurizio Cucchiara

Re: [jira] [Created] (WW-3714) Rename org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2

2011/11/30 Maurizio Cucchiara : > At that time there was no planning for 3.x version :) > Furthermore, AFAIK the original problem is already solved in the trunk, > isn't it? Yes, it was but that change should be done months ago, when S2 absorb XWork :/ > As I said before, rename the OS package wi

Re: Using fluido once available

2011/11/30 Łukasz Lenart : > 2011/11/30 Christian Grobmeier : * Release notes cannot be found easily. Martin said it is in the first section, but I actually mean this page: http://struts.apache.org/downloads.html I could not find the release notes of prior releases easily. There

Re: Using fluido once available

2011/11/30 Christian Grobmeier : >>> * Release notes cannot be found easily. Martin said it is in the first >>> section, but I actually mean this page: >>> http://struts.apache.org/downloads.html I could not find the release notes >>> of prior releases easily. There is this changes maven plugin whi

Re: Using fluido once available

2011/11/30 Łukasz Lenart : >> * Lukasz mentioned the content is fixed size. This is now fixed (fluid) >> :-). We run again into the doxia problems, but i have worked around them. > > Is it possible to have a top limit ? eg. 1024px ? ;-) Oh dear - your ideas :-) But actually there is a chance

Re: Using fluido once available

Hello, On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote: > 1. the new site looks very good > 2. as Martin already said and according with the stats [1], struts website > attracts every day many users, so we cannot ignore accessibility. this was actually not my intention and I agree of

Re: Using fluido once available

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote: > It's very hard to think that "next link" provides a good tour of the struts > features (I'm pretty sure it got lost over the years), and then what > features should it describe: Struts 2 or Struts 1? > > If there is one thing that I hav

Re: Using fluido once available

It's very hard to think that "next link" provides a good tour of the struts features (I'm pretty sure it got lost over the years), and then what features should it describe: Struts 2 or Struts 1? If there is one thing that I have never considered clean on the website is the S1-S2 distinction. I th

Re: [jira] [Created] (WW-3714) Rename org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2

At that time there was no planning for 3.x version :) Furthermore, AFAIK the original problem is already solved in the trunk, isn't it? As I said before, rename the OS package will break the backward-compatibility, so, take for example IDE like IDEA: because of this its struts integration might st

Re: Using fluido once available

Hi all, I would have liked to be more involved in that discussion, but unfortunately I have been very busy. So, sorry in advance if I will miss something. First I would like to say that: 1. the new site looks very good 2. as Martin already said and according with the stats [1], struts website attra

Re: [jira] [Created] (WW-3714) Rename org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2

2011/11/30 Maurizio Cucchiara : >> Should I commit ? > > I'm not sure this is the right time to change the package name, we should > make cleaner the loss of backward-compatibility, maybe we should wait until > 3.x release? But we already discussed that [1] and we shouldn't postpone clean up proce

Re: [jira] [Created] (WW-3714) Rename org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2

> Should I commit ? I'm not sure this is the right time to change the package name, we should make cleaner the loss of backward-compatibility, maybe we should wait until 3.x release? Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linke

Re: [jira] [Created] (WW-3714) Rename org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2

Hi all, I would not worry for an eventual promotion to TLP, there will be an incubation period which will allow to refactor the code. At the moment, considering that XWork is a sub-project of S2, the reasonable way (IMO) to handle a package refactoring is to change com.os to org.apache.struts.xwor

Re: [jira] [Created] (WW-3714) Rename org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2

Should I commit ? Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail

Re: [jira] [Created] (WW-3714) Rename org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2

Packages renamed, 1349 files were affected ;-) Kind regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.o

Re: Using fluido once available

2011/11/29 Christian Grobmeier : > Hello all, > > here is a new draft: > http://code.grobmeier.de/struts-draft-v3/ Looks nice :-) > * Lukasz mentioned the content is fixed size. This is now fixed (fluid) > :-). We run again into the doxia problems, but i have worked around them. Is it possible t