Re: [jira] [Commented] (WW-3714) Rename org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2

2011-12-01 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
sorry the branch :) Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin:http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara Maurizio Cucchiara 2011/12/1 Łukasz Lenart > Trunk

Re: [jira] [Commented] (WW-3714) Rename org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2

2011-12-01 Thread Łukasz Lenart
2011/12/1 Maurizio Cucchiara : > Can't you do a rollback to the original branch without any deletion? Will try... > if you delete the trunk, I am afraid my local changes will get out of synch. Trunk ? Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confi

Re: [jira] [Commented] (WW-3714) Rename org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2

2011-12-01 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Can't you do a rollback to the original branch without any deletion? if you delete the trunk, I am afraid my local changes will get out of synch. Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin:http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauri

Re: Deprecate 2.1 version

2011-12-01 Thread Łukasz Lenart
2011/12/1 Paul Benedict : > I've been silently following this thread :-) Here's my take... ;-) > It would be inappropriate to rename packages in a minor version bump. I > just think that defeats expectations for normal upgrades since minor point > upgrades should be compatible with current code.

Re: [jira] [Commented] (WW-3714) Rename org.opensymphony.xwork2 to org.apache.struts2.xwork2

2011-12-01 Thread Łukasz Lenart
I have to start over, Subversion / IDEA and me did a huge mess and now I cannot resolve conflicts :/ Need to drop the branch and start from scratch ;-) Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/

Re: Deprecate 2.1 version

2011-12-01 Thread Paul Benedict
I've been silently following this thread :-) Here's my take... It would be inappropriate to rename packages in a minor version bump. I just think that defeats expectations for normal upgrades since minor point upgrades should be compatible with current code. On the other hand, moving to version 3