Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA2

Just upgrading the jars, I now get ERROR Dispatcher Could not find action or result: /events/license.action This method: execute for action license is not allowed! - [unknown location] I have not added any DMI security settings, is this correct? Cheers Greg On 29 September 2015 at 07:38, Johan

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA2

+1 (binding) [ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [x] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) Johannes # web: http://www.jgeppert.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep 2015-09-28 22:53 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart : > The Apache Struts 2.5 BETA2 test build

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Struts-JDK8-master #31

2015-09-22 16:18 GMT+02:00 Aaron Johnson : > WW-4402 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4402) has > patch WW-4402.diff ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12734928/WW-4402.diff) > that makes the annotation processor compliant with JDK8. This is a separate > project from the

[VOTE] Struts 2.5 BETA2

The Apache Struts 2.5 BETA2 test build is now available. New in BETA1 - XWork source was merged into Struts Core source, it means that there be no more xwork artifact nor dedicated jar - OGNL was upgraded to version 3.0.11 and it breaks access to properties as it follows Java Bean Specification, s

Build failed in Jenkins: Struts-JDK8-master #36

See Changes: [Lukasz Lenart] Drops wildcard as a valid action method [Lukasz Lenart] Defines global-allowed-methods [Lukasz Lenart] Uses global-allowed-methods config para [Lukasz Lenart] Drops strict DMI [Lukasz Lenart] Drops outd

[GitHub] struts pull request: WW-4540: Strict DMI

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/47 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl

Re: [GitHub] struts pull request: WW-4540: Strict DMI

2015-09-28 13:11 GMT+02:00 Christoph Nenning : >> > What does the current implementation do? >> > if strictDMI is set to false it returns false. >> > if it is set to true parent packages are checked. if it is true in one >> > parent true is returned. >> > otherwise true is returned in anycase. >> >

Re: [GitHub] struts pull request: WW-4540: Strict DMI

> > Well, I don't think it is necessary to check parent packages at all. > > Because strictDMI is a primitive boolean and cannot be null. So each > > package has it explicitly configured, inheriting it is not required. > > PackageConfig.isStrictMethodInvocation() should just return that value. >

Re: [GitHub] struts pull request: WW-4540: Strict DMI

+1 Johannes # web: http://www.jgeppert.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep 2015-09-28 9:50 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart : > If there be no objections I would like to merge this PR and push a new > BETA today > > 2015-09-26 9:57 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lena

Re: [GitHub] struts pull request: WW-4540: Strict DMI

If there be no objections I would like to merge this PR and push a new BETA today 2015-09-26 9:57 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart : > 2015-09-25 16:04 GMT+02:00 Christoph Nenning : >> Well, I don't think it is necessary to check parent packages at all. >> Because strictDMI is a primitive boolean and canno