2016-10-20 7:56 GMT+02:00 Johannes Geppert :
> In generally I really like the idea.
> But how should maven publish work with this groupId?
Not sure but I think there be no problems - when requesting access via
Sonatype you must define groupId and artifactId as well. It doesn't
matter that two diff
> > the weaver website is talking a lot about maven and ant integration,
but
> > wouldn't struts need it at runtime?
>
> Yeah, you can integrate a preprocessor with Maven but it works in
> runtime as well.
>
> > If weaver could scan classpath whether asm/javassist/cglib are present
and
> > use
In generally I really like the idea.
But how should maven publish work with this groupId?
Best Regards
Johannes
#
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
2016-10-20 6:18 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> Rather an universal grou
Rather an universal groupId, something like net.liftmodules in the
Lift framework http://www.liftweb.net/lift_modules
2016-10-19 22:45 GMT+02:00 Martin Gainty :
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> From: lukaszlen...@apache.org
>> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:09:48 +0200
>> Subject: Using org.apache.struts2.plugin
>> To
Hi,
What do you think about allowing third parties to use
"org.apache.struts2.plugin" namespace in their plugins?
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.ap
