Hello Craig:
Thanks for the insight. I have been working with Struts since your
beginning in the 2nd half of 2000. I aggree with your technology
assessment and just concentrate on getting the job done.
BaTien
DBGROUPS
Craig McClanahan wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 09:48:32 -0700, BaTien Duong
Ted Husted wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:29:06 -0700, BaTien Duong wrote:
This is a showcase of open sources :-)
Are we talking about the next-generation of DB Group's PSI package?
Is this a framework that you will be able to share with the community, or will
the code remain in-house
to the community.
I will expect may different opinions. The bottom line that benefits all
developers is a top-class business application framework comming out
from Struts 2 (Shale and Jericho).
BaTien
DBGROUPS
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:23:39 -0700, BaTien Duong wrote:
Here is how based on my working
Peter, Thanks for your view. I have made a good working prototype sice
the first email. Interested persons can see my updates below:
Pilgrim, Peter wrote:
-Original Message-
From: BaTien Duong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings and request expert advice:
Commons-chain invented
Craig McClanahan wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:20:02 -0600, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to have a hook into processValidate() on validation failure.
Currently that can only be done by copy-and-pasting the processValidate()
method from RequestProcessor into a subclass and
Craig McClanahan wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:03:23 -0700, BaTien Duong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
3) CoR is finer grain than IoC in the construction and rounting of
services within and between software layers, while IoC is aprropriate at
the application level.
I don't think
a HashMap conflicts
with a SQL database as they both store data. They are two very
different things with very different problems they are trying to solve.
Don
BaTien Duong wrote:
Craig McClanahan wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:20:02 -0600, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
Craig McClanahan wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:44:04 -0800, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reason that a JSF-independent version of the
application-wide controller scheme, as just checked in, couldn't be
part of Struts 1.3?
That should work fine, as long as 1.3 is
Ted Husted wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:57:15 -0400, Ted Husted wrote:
... that we rename the package called impl as faces.
As to the impl package:
I think what really bothers me here is that the classes implemented here are not part
of the Shale API. As soon as I saw ImplViewHandler, I
Ted Husted wrote:
Yesterday, as advertised, the Shale API built without any external dependencies (whatsoever).
Today, the new implementations require dependencies on Servlet 2.4, JSF, and Commons Logging.
Hello Craig and Ted:
Please continue to post up-to-date Shale API. This is an
Cedric Dumoulin wrote:
Greeting Cedric:
It has been a long time to see you again on the list. I wonder if you
have some time to make tiles work better with faces. Here is what I have
tried faces and tiles without struts (so no plug-in):
1) If i load TileServlet as instructed, the log said tile
11 matches
Mail list logo
