Its in its own subproject now.
-Original Message-
From: Riyaz Mansoor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 5:18 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Tiles in 1.3 ?
hi guys.
sturts dev 1.3
was wondering what happened to Tiles in 1.3 ?
riyaz
---
Frank,
Actually, I am a little confused about this. Given that I believe the
quickest (which may or may not necessarily be the best) way to a
solution here is to subclass the current HTML taglibs. Or alternatively
create a new Ajax tagset that incorporates the HTML taglib type
functionality. Yet I
Ahh but in whatever configuration, we have a place to discuss it :)
Since it is your baby I'll let you decide the subject descriptor.
Al
-Original Message-
From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 3:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Struts Develop
Ted,
Thanks for clearing that up. :)
Al
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 3:04 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: RFC: Struts HTML Ajax-Aware Tags
On Apr 7, 2005 2:35 PM, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
ww.omnytex.com
On Thu, April 7, 2005 1:58 pm, Fogleson, Allen said:
> Yes, I think that is the bottom line, but I believe your post did
> provide some good things.
>
> 1) there is some interest from other developers in assisting with such
a
> project.
>
> 2) Although the initial pr
Jack,
I can understand where you are coming from, but I believe that the
struts PMC and committers have a valid point here.
Perhaps a better question to ask (and I expect I know the answer to
this) is...
How can we get ajax into the sandbox.
I suspect that the apache sandbox is using the same
ware Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
On Thu, April 7, 2005 1:28 pm, Ted Husted said:
> On Apr 7, 2005 1:12 PM, Fogleson, Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Jack,
>>
>> Actually my comments were in no way an answer to his proposal. I
believe
Im not sure I understand your question.
I believe the dev list here is rather open to the types of discussion we
were having about struts-ajax. It is not my intention to halt that
discussion, my point is that I believe Franks initial question was
answered, and it is time to begin a discussion, wh
Ted,
While we are on the subject of patches
Lets say a patch is submitted.. is it enough to rely on the bugzilla
message that is sent when a bug is altered or should the patch be
generally announced here. From reading the contributing guides it seems
to say announce it on the dev list, but to
: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 12:34 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Cc: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: RFC: Struts HTML Ajax-Aware Tags
On Thu, April 7, 2005 1:15 pm, Fogleson, Allen said:
> Huh?
>
> SVN is like CVS. You don't lock
Ted,
Thanks for the correction. I was confused about the bylaws I guess.
(Should have went to them for clarity instead of going from the top of
my head)
Of course the end result remains the same ;) Essentially if any of us
care to see a struts-ajax integration then we need to get it started,
an
Answer 11
The real bottom line here is the original post
Q: will a struts ajax integration be beneficial to the community and can
we start it on the struts repository.
A: Sure it might be beneficial, but no it is not going to happen on the
main apache repository.
Just because someone doesn
I'll choose answer 7 here... (wasn't that the hmmm... I just saved $30
at geico)
Ohh man. The only thing I can say is both are just hilarious.
Lucky for me I work 4 10's (more or less.. they end up being 12's or
13's) so today is Friday for me :)
Al
-Original Message-
From: Niall Pembe
al Message-
From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 12:04 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Cc: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: RFC: Struts HTML Ajax-Aware Tags
On Thu, April 7, 2005 12:59 pm, Fogleson, Allen said:
> Svn checkout.
Really? That is intere
-Original Message-
From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 11:36 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: RFC: Struts HTML Ajax-Aware Tags
On Apr 7, 2005 9:17 AM, Fogleson, Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hmm,
>
> I don't kno
Svn checkout.
Yes I agree it makes it more difficult to contribute when all the
committers are so busy working on the thing. Which is why I expect my
patches to be late in being applied. And heck I may have to rewrite them
again :)
Although the 1.2 branch seems to be a "dead end" I know there ar
http://www.omnytex.com
On Thu, April 7, 2005 11:37 am, Fogleson, Allen said:
> Frank,
>
> In 1.3 all the extras are refactored into their own projects... tags,
> tiles, etc.
>
> Al
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sen
Frank,
In 1.3 all the extras are refactored into their own projects... tags,
tiles, etc.
Al
-Original Message-
From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 10:02 AM
To: Hubert Rabago
Cc: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: RFC: Struts HTML Ajax-Aware
Personally I don't see where putting the code inline or forcing the use
of a .js file through a switch really brings value. If the switch bought
some value, say advanced features or something then it might make sense.
Power users could turn on the switch and access these wonderful extra
features th
Stupid cut and paste didn't get carriage returns... Here is a formatted
one :)
#
#In ActionResources.properties but not _JA.properties
#
configExtends.creation=Unable to create an instance of {0}
configExtends=Error extending {0} {1}
configFieldRequired=Missing {0} value for {1} {2}
Of course Jap
That part - figuring out whats in one and not the other is easy. From
current checkout (a couple days old)
core\src\share\org\apache\struts\action
# properties in /ActionResources.properties that are not present in
/ActionResources_ja.properties
#Mon Apr 04 23:33:27 CDT 2005
configExtends.creation
21 matches
Mail list logo