RC3 seems build OK now. Thanks.
On 24/02/2022 11:23, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
czw., 24 lut 2022 o 10:16 Greg Huber napisał(a):
..the rc3 branch (from github) looks great! 😁😁
Great! I've prepared another test build but didn't publish it yet as I
have a problem accessing a SSH server to transfer f
czw., 24 lut 2022 o 10:16 Greg Huber napisał(a):
>
> ..the rc3 branch (from github) looks great! 😁😁
Great! I've prepared another test build but didn't publish it yet as I
have a problem accessing a SSH server to transfer files between
https://repository.apache.org and
https://dist.apache.org/repo
..the rc3 branch (from github) looks great! 😁😁
On 23/02/2022 09:18, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
OSM!!!
śr., 23 lut 2022 o 08:53 Greg Huber napisał(a):
I tested the usecase
struts.date.formatter=dateTimeFormatter >> Too many pattern letters: a
struts.date.formatter=simpleDateFormatter >> Wednesda
OSM!!!
śr., 23 lut 2022 o 08:53 Greg Huber napisał(a):
>
> I tested the usecase
>
>
>
> struts.date.formatter=dateTimeFormatter >> Too many pattern letters: a
>
> struts.date.formatter=simpleDateFormatter >> Wednesday, 23 Feb 12:00 PM
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> roll RC3😁
>
> On 23/02/2022 06:19,
I tested the usecase
struts.date.formatter=dateTimeFormatter >> Too many pattern letters: a
struts.date.formatter=simpleDateFormatter >> Wednesday, 23 Feb 12:00 PM
Looks good to me.
roll RC3😁
On 23/02/2022 06:19, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
wt., 22 lut 2022 o 15:07 Greg Huber napisał(a):
Date i
wt., 22 lut 2022 o 15:07 Greg Huber napisał(a):
>
> Date is fine.
>
> The org.apache.struts2.components.Date class can handle other types ie
> LocalDateTime, LocalDate, Instant bean types, I can only test the
> java.util.Date variant.
>
> (..saying that, it would most probably work as LocalDate is
Date is fine.
The org.apache.struts2.components.Date class can handle other types ie
LocalDateTime, LocalDate, Instant bean types, I can only test the
java.util.Date variant.
(..saying that, it would most probably work as LocalDate is the only new
variant introduced on this change.)
It wor
wt., 22 lut 2022 o 09:53 Greg Huber napisał(a):
> Checking my beans, all of my dates are of type java.sql.Timestamp
> (datetime on mariadb)
>
> On class
>
> Date.end(Writer writer, String body)
>
> matches java.util.Date
>
> Object dateObject = findValue(name);
> if (dateObject instanceof
Great, one less call to hungry TextProvider😉.
Passes my tests, and screen wise, for me, each formatter matches exactly
struts.date.formatter=dateTimeFormatter
struts.date.formatter=simpleDateFormatter
##
Checking my beans, all of my dates are of type java.sql.Timestamp
(datetime on mariadb)
pon., 21 lut 2022 o 09:29 Greg Huber napisał(a):
>
> When using branch : WW-5016-uses-proper-format
>
> struts.date.formatter=simpleDateFormatter
>
> I get lots of these warnings
>
> 2022-02-21 08:21:36,677 WARN
> com.opensymphony.xwork2.util.AbstractLocalizedTextProvider
> AbstractLocalizedTextPr
When using branch : WW-5016-uses-proper-format
struts.date.formatter=simpleDateFormatter
I get lots of these warnings
2022-02-21 08:21:36,677 WARN
com.opensymphony.xwork2.util.AbstractLocalizedTextProvider
AbstractLocalizedTextProvider:findDefaultText - Missing key
[struts.date.format] in bu
pon., 21 lut 2022 o 08:44 Greg Huber napisał(a):
>
> is it ready to test? I can do a merge on a rc2 branch and see what happens.
Yes, it's ready. You can test different formatters by defining constant:
struts.date.formatter=dateTimeFormatter // new Java 8 API
or
struts.date.formatter=simpleDat
is it ready to test? I can do a merge on a rc2 branch and see what happens.
On 21/02/2022 07:37, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
pon., 21 lut 2022 o 08:36 Greg Huber napisał(a):
which pr?
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/529
Cheers
Łukasz
--
pon., 21 lut 2022 o 08:36 Greg Huber napisał(a):
>
> which pr?
https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/529
Cheers
Łukasz
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts
which pr?
On 21/02/2022 07:35, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
Great! The one PR left and we are good :)
pon., 21 lut 2022 o 08:30 Greg Huber napisał(a):
Yes, thanks 😁
On 20/02/2022 16:29, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
Is that ok?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Struts+2.5+to+6.0.0+migration#Str
Great! The one PR left and we are good :)
pon., 21 lut 2022 o 08:30 Greg Huber napisał(a):
>
> Yes, thanks 😁
>
> On 20/02/2022 16:29, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> > Is that ok?
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Struts+2.5+to+6.0.0+migration#Struts2.5to6.0.0migration-JavatemplateCheckbo
Yes, thanks 😁
On 20/02/2022 16:29, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
Is that ok?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Struts+2.5+to+6.0.0+migration#Struts2.5to6.0.0migration-JavatemplateCheckboxtag
niedz., 20 lut 2022 o 16:45 Greg Huber napisał(a):
yes, looks ok.
On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 at 12:32, L
Is that ok?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Struts+2.5+to+6.0.0+migration#Struts2.5to6.0.0migration-JavatemplateCheckboxtag
niedz., 20 lut 2022 o 16:45 Greg Huber napisał(a):
>
> yes, looks ok.
>
> On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 at 12:32, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>
> > niedz., 20 lut 2022 o 13:0
yes, looks ok.
On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 at 12:32, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> niedz., 20 lut 2022 o 13:07 Greg Huber napisał(a):
> >
> > Yes, I know this was not in the original rc, but its worth including in
> > this release if possible (to keep the plugin insync with the freemarker).
> >
> > The defaul
niedz., 20 lut 2022 o 13:07 Greg Huber napisał(a):
>
> Yes, I know this was not in the original rc, but its worth including in
> this release if possible (to keep the plugin insync with the freemarker).
>
> The default is now to hide the hidden field, so a review of tags might
> be necessary.
Sur
Yes, I know this was not in the original rc, but its worth including in
this release if possible (to keep the plugin insync with the freemarker).
The default is now to hide the hidden field, so a review of tags might
be necessary.
On 20/02/2022 11:57, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
niedz., 20 lut 2022
niedz., 20 lut 2022 o 11:11 Greg Huber napisał(a):
> can we include the java templates stuff for submitUnchecked? There must
> be a few users using the plugin.
You mean this PR [1] and your comment [2] to add it to the guideline?
[1] https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/531
[2] https://github.c
can we include the java templates stuff for submitUnchecked? There must
be a few users using the plugin.
On 20/02/2022 09:38, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
niedz., 20 lut 2022 o 10:23 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
Yes, there were a small refactoring around this and all those
interfaces have been moved int
niedz., 20 lut 2022 o 10:23 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
> Yes, there were a small refactoring around this and all those
> interfaces have been moved into org.apache.struts2.action.* package to
> indicates that they should be used with actions
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4963
I extend
Ok thanks, they seem to work :-)
On 20/02/2022 09:23, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
pt., 18 lut 2022 o 11:46 Greg Huber napisał(a):
Noticed these are now marked as depreciated. Is this part of v6 stuff?
org.apache.struts2.interceptor.ServletRequestAware;
org.apache.struts2.interceptor.SessionAware;
pt., 18 lut 2022 o 11:46 Greg Huber napisał(a):
>
> Noticed these are now marked as depreciated. Is this part of v6 stuff?
>
> org.apache.struts2.interceptor.ServletRequestAware;
> org.apache.struts2.interceptor.SessionAware;
>
>
> Interface ServletRequestAware
Yes, there were a small refact
Noticed these are now marked as depreciated. Is this part of v6 stuff?
org.apache.struts2.interceptor.ServletRequestAware;
org.apache.struts2.interceptor.SessionAware;
Interface ServletRequestAware
On 29/01/2022 16:49, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
Hello,
This is a second RC of incoming Struts 6.
tion including path '/WEB-INF/jsp/my.jsp'.
> >> 3. ...
> >>
> >> *File*: java/time/format/DateTimeFormatterBuilder.java
> >> *Line number*: 1,774
> >>
> >>
> >> although if I test ' dd, hh:mm aa' using Si
-- Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: [TEST] Struts 2 ver. 6.0.0-RC2 test build is ready
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 09:30:47 +
From: Greg Huber
To: dev@struts.apache.org
I have noticed that the date format only now wants a single a. I get an
error when using two.
err
number*: 1,774
>
>
> although if I test ' dd, hh:mm aa' using SimpleDateFormat it works
>
> Tuesday February 22, 12:00 PM
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message
> Subject:Re: [TEST] Struts 2 ver. 6.0.0-RC2 test build is ready
> Dat
dd, hh:mm aa' using SimpleDateFormat it works
Tuesday February 22, 12:00 PM
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: [TEST] Struts 2 ver. 6.0.0-RC2 test build is ready
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 09:30:47 +
From: Greg Huber
To: dev@struts.apache.org
I have n
I have noticed that the date format only now wants a single a. I get an
error when using two.
error
works
Checking previous commits it's always been aa ie two.
On 29/01/2022 16:49, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
Hello,
This is a second RC of incoming Struts 6.x with tons of changes.
Please take a t
czw., 3 lut 2022 o 17:26 Eduardo Guadalupe napisał(a):
> I tried to build the Project but i am having an error. Any tips about how
> to solve it?
>
> Failed to execute goal on project struts2-jasperreports-plugin: Could not
> resolve dependencies for project
> org.apache.struts:struts2-jasperrepo
Hi,
I tried to build the Project but i am having an error. Any tips about how
to solve it?
Failed to execute goal on project struts2-jasperreports-plugin: Could not
resolve dependencies for project
org.apache.struts:struts2-jasperreports-plugin:jar:6.0.0-RC2:
Could not find artifact com.lowag
Hello,
This is a second RC of incoming Struts 6.x with tons of changes.
Please take a time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. Please
report any problems you will spot.
Staging Maven repo
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/
Standalone artifacts
https://dist.apache.org/
35 matches
Mail list logo
