Re: [s2] Improved Velocity Integration

2008-09-18 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Don, Don Brown wrote: > Ah, that does look a lot better. I still wish velocity supported > named parameters, but this is better than nothing. Yeah, I pitched named parameters to the Velocity folks and they generally balked because Velocity is simpl

Re: [s2] Improved Velocity Integration

2008-09-17 Thread Don Brown
Ah, that does look a lot better. I still wish velocity supported named parameters, but this is better than nothing. Could you file a ticket for this improvement please, and if you have time to write a patch, it would certainly be appreciated :) Don On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Christopher S

[s2] Improved Velocity Integration

2008-09-17 Thread Christopher Schultz
All, I'm an S1 user and a member of the Velocity team. I recently posted a message to the velocity-dev list regarding the ugly syntax required by the S2 tag Velocity implementation. For reference: http://www.nabble.com/Named-macro-parameters-td19459070.html The gist of the question was: can Velo