and ..?
Don Brown-2 wrote:
>
> I've cleared all but a couple issues out of Struts 2.1.1, so I think
> we are ready for a release. The only kinda blocking issue is the
> portlet tests failing, but that seems to have something to do with the
> setup, not our portlet code, so we could even p
--- "David Durham, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd definitely be interested in using a JQuery plugin for struts if it
> came out (has one already?).
Not really; I had just barely started to convert the existing 2.1 plugin to
jQuery then decided it really wouldn't help me very much. You're w
I'd definitely be interested in using a JQuery plugin for struts if it
came out (has one already?). I've found the library to be very
useful. The documentation is pretty good, though a little out of date
wrt. some of the plugins (the UI ones notably, but they're getting a
lot of dev work right no
Adam Peller wrote:
>
>
> Dojo 1.0 is all about performance and stability, and the follow-on Dojo
> 1.x releases continue in that direction with no radical changes to the
> core or Dijit architecture. Dojo base is now very tiny (<25K, on par with
> other toolkits) and the performance of the ne
I'm glad I am not the only what thinking this. I think dojo should be thrown
out completely. Its a ridiculous that my normal 30KB web page request jumps
to 500KB+ request as soon as I use the shead - ajax tag.
I find jquery much smaller and easier to work with.
Matt
Musachy Barroso wrote:
>
Try ExtJS and u will find it amazing.
jmitchell wrote:
>
> I think everyone should take a long serious look at ExtJS. I'm using
> it on my current gig right now (very large s2 app) and except for a
> few small quirks, it is helping us cover far more ground than we could
> without it or with a d
Hi guys,
I'm just a Struts 2 (heavy) user, but I think I can contribute with that.
Sometime ago I wrote a Struts Interceptor and a Sitemesh Decorator Mapper
that can apply a different (sometimes empty) decorator when you have an ajax
request:
I use it to graceful
2008/2/22, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Antonio Petrelli <
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What about the XAP framework then:
> > http://incubator.apache.org/xap/
> > At least that team have already scratched their head :-)
>
> Well, understand that XAP
Yeah, true enough. Although the 2 things I never "loved" with rails were
resolving multiple action methods with all the different validations and
before_ hooks, etc that you only wanted to run for one or two of the
methods, and 2) empty active record models. But that's a different
discussion :)
Sounds good. If you can, I think you should share it. Host it at
googlecode, add it to the plugin registry and announce it on the users
list. There's plenty of S2 plugins hosted at googlecode, some that have
many downloads. If its popular and useful it'll soon be noticed. That's
how SmartURL
Hey Jeremy,
Thanks for writing back. I was kind of starting to wonder if I wasn't
supposed to be posting to this list :).
I really like portions of the REST plugin, but I wanted to be able to
leverage a lot of the interface and class level patterns in Struts (ie, 1
class 1 action), so I ended up
Blake Byrnes wrote:
I dealt with the ajax result discrepency (ie, if you make an ajax request,
you generally want a different result, but probably want to share the same
action) by writing a few things:
1) A sitemesh filter that ignores requests with the content header
X-Requested-With=XMLHttpReq
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Antonio Petrelli <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/2/21, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > Before a GA release of 2.1 I'd ideally like to see dojo upgraded to
> the
> > > lat
I think everyone should take a long serious look at ExtJS. I'm using
it on my current gig right now (very large s2 app) and except for a
few small quirks, it is helping us cover far more ground than we could
without it or with a different framework.
Trust me, you can't appreciate it until you try
Ian Roughley wrote:
Dave Newton wrote:
--- Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yikes.
The issue with the Dojo plugin (and any other, like my somewhat-waylaid
jQuery plugin) is that I end up writing all the JavaScript anyway,
and the
tags don't help me very much in all but the *mo
Brian Pontarelli wrote:
Dave Newton wrote:
--- Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a list of "gotchas" for a 2.0 to 2.1 migration?
One was started at
http://cwiki.apache.org/S2WIKI/troubleshooting-guide-migrating-from-struts-20x-to-21x.html
There are more that should be
Dave Newton wrote:
--- Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a list of "gotchas" for a 2.0 to 2.1 migration?
One was started at
http://cwiki.apache.org/S2WIKI/troubleshooting-guide-migrating-from-struts-20x-to-21x.html
There are more that should be added to this page. I'll t
Just some additional thoughts on this front... It seems like most
frameworks are heading in very similar directions now. They are all
getting lighter, faster, and better at selecting and manipulating
elements. I'm in favor or having some AJAX functionality baked, but I
have never found it ver
>
> I'd suggest that Class 1 comes from all the tags which were in S2.0 core and
> moved out to the plugin in S2.1, this would give S2.0 users a smoother
> migration path knowing that they can chop and change ajax plugins to find
> one they like without the risk of wasting time on a plugin that
Musachy Barroso wrote:
>
> I have totally changed my position about the dojo plugin. I think Struts
> should have some ajax functionality for the most commom use cases, but I
> think we just picked the wrong ajax framework.
>
Musachy, have you looked at Dojo lately? I can understand your frus
that doesn't
deliver what they need.
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Wes Wannemacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: [s2] Let's get out Struts 2.1.1
I may get boos on this, but
I dealt with the ajax result discrepency (ie, if you make an ajax request,
you generally want a different result, but probably want to share the same
action) by writing a few things:
1) A sitemesh filter that ignores requests with the content header
X-Requested-With=XMLHttpRequest
2) An Interceptor
I may get boos on this, but I've thought about creating a hand-rolled
AJAX plugin. I like the available JS frameworks like
Prototype/Dojo/JQuery, but it does seem like there are a lot of
gotchas with any one of them. Having written some XHR processing in
vanilla javascript, sometimes I wonder how h
Dave Newton wrote:
--- Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Before a GA release of 2.1 I'd ideally like to see dojo upgraded to the
latest, greatest stable version,
I have totally changed my position a
> The Microsoft YUI? :D
>
I had forgot that. /cry. Good thing that it has a BSD license.
musachy
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comma
--- Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Before a GA release of 2.1 I'd ideally like to see dojo upgraded to the
> > latest, greatest stable version,
> I have totally changed my position about the dojo plugin. I thin
2008/2/21, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Before a GA release of 2.1 I'd ideally like to see dojo upgraded to the
> > latest, greatest stable version,
>
>
> I have totally changed my position about the dojo plugin.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Before a GA release of 2.1 I'd ideally like to see dojo upgraded to the
> latest, greatest stable version,
I have totally changed my position about the dojo plugin. I think
Struts should have some ajax functionality for the m
--- Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a list of "gotchas" for a 2.0 to 2.1 migration?
One was started at
http://cwiki.apache.org/S2WIKI/troubleshooting-guide-migrating-from-struts-20x-to-21x.html
Dave
-
To unsubsc
Is there a list of "gotchas" for a 2.0 to 2.1 migration?
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Pontarelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: [s2] Let's get out Struts 2.1.1
opposed to half way through the 2.1 lifecycle. I'd also like to see a
change
to actrionError and actionMessage handling which removes the need for the
store interceptor for redirects, but I know that's something that's in
the
very early stages of thought.
That would be great. This should pr
st"
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 10:54 PM
Subject: Re: [s2] Let's get out Struts 2.1.1
Here's the thing - I'm going to create the 2.1.1 test build on Sunday,
hopefully followed by test builds every couple weeks or so. Whatever
you can get into the code by those dates wi
Here's the thing - I'm going to create the 2.1.1 test build on Sunday,
hopefully followed by test builds every couple weeks or so. Whatever
you can get into the code by those dates will be included in the
subsequent release. Honestly, I don't expect 2.1.1 to be GA, but am
aiming for a Beta vote.
If convention-plugin is not bundled with the next release, people will stick
to the codebehind plugin. Last time I checked there was no smarturls for
2.1.x as well - so there is really not much choice.
(compiling from the sandbox is no option for most users)
You are probably correct. Howeve
Am Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2008 17:16:51 schrieb Brian Pontarelli:
> The API has yet to be solidified and there are a few things that I'd
> still like to discuss and possibly change in that regard. My main goal
> is to ensure backwards compatibility in the convention plugin API.
My thinking is like
+1!
Fabiano Franz
http://fabianofranz.com
http://literar.org
Piero Sartini-3 wrote:
>
> I think you should release the convention plugin at all costs - but this
> is
> just a vote from an user.
>
> piero
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-s2--Let%27s-ge
2008/2/20, Brian Pontarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> The API has yet to be solidified...
About future and current development.
Releasing a distribution does not mean that it must be "complete": we will
vote its quality and, from your discussion, I presume that it will be
"alpha". But, at least,
Don, on the subject of XWork releases, I should have made this a
blocker, but this bug needs to be closed and I have a fix ready, just
don't have commit access. The patch is also in the bug if you want to
take care of it:
http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-599
-bp
Don Brown wrote:
Oh,
The API has yet to be solidified and there are a few things that I'd
still like to discuss and possibly change in that regard. My main goal
is to ensure backwards compatibility in the convention plugin API.
Furthermore, I think we should all start thinking about when the "true"
stable release
Oh, I know how to release Struts; I was referring to the XWork
release. IIRC, this will be the first release with the Maven 2 build,
so we'll see how it goes...
Don
On 2/20/08, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2008 6:01 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are there an
I think you should release the convention plugin at all costs - but this is
just a vote from an user.
piero
Am Montag, 18. Februar 2008 18:16:52 schrieb Brian Pontarelli:
> Don Brown wrote:
> > I've cleared all but a couple issues out of Struts 2.1.1, so I think
> > we are ready
On Feb 19, 2008 6:01 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any special instructions or is it a simple 'mvn
> release:prepare release:perform'?
Antonio linked to this earlier:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Creating+and+Signing+a+Struts+2.1.x+Distribution
--
Wendy
-
Are there any special instructions or is it a simple 'mvn
release:prepare release:perform'?
Don
On 2/18/08, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don,
>
> great work, thanks for your help...
> I'm really busy during the week so that I can not release before
> friday evening (GMT+2), 23rd.
Please do:)
> Don Brown wrote:> > I've cleared all but a couple issues out of Struts 2.1.1,
> so I think> > we are ready for a release. The only kinda blocking issue is
> the> > portlet tests failing, but that seems to have something to do with
> the> > setup, not our portlet code, so we could
Don Brown wrote:
I've cleared all but a couple issues out of Struts 2.1.1, so I think
we are ready for a release. The only kinda blocking issue is the
portlet tests failing, but that seems to have something to do with the
setup, not our portlet code, so we could even punt that one.
Any objectio
I can help out with this one too .. any time this week. Let me know
what you need.
Thanks
On Feb 17, 2008 11:11 AM, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don,
>
> great work, thanks for your help...
> I'm really busy during the week so that I can not release before
> friday evening (GMT
Don,
great work, thanks for your help...
I'm really busy during the week so that I can not release before
friday evening (GMT+2), 23rd. If this will still meet you timeline I can
do the release otherwise either you or Pat could roll the release.
If you need any help, I'm available via IM.
cheers
There was a complaint
(https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2101) that some classes in
the portlet integration was removed without notice in a previous
release. Should probably get that into the release notes this time, or
add the classes back as no-op classes with a deprecation notice.
Nils
Ok, here are the release notes so far:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.1.1
I'm planning on a date of Feb 24 Australia time so Feb 23 for the US.
I've closed out all but one ticket in XWork 2.1.1, which I may bump as
well.
Rainer, any chance on getting an XWork 2.1.1
Actually, wait a sec. I keep forgetting that i can't 'clean install'
with xwork in the profiles
mvn clean install -Pxwork,all << -- fails
Each one runs fine separately.
So nevermind.
On Feb 16, 2008 2:19 PM, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right, I don't trust Maven enoug
Right, I don't trust Maven enough to rely solely on the
maven.repo.local switch, but that's another discussion ;)
I am getting a build failure right now. Is anyone else seeing this?
Failed tests:
testAnnotatedMethodFailure(com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.ValidatorAnnotationTest)
setUp(c
On Feb 16, 2008 10:19 AM, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's probably a good idea to try the build after moving or removing
> your .m2 dir to fully ensure a clean set of publicly available
> dependencies.
>
> I'll do this right now to make sure...stay tuned.
That's what I did, excep
It's probably a good idea to try the build after moving or removing
your .m2 dir to fully ensure a clean set of publicly available
dependencies.
I'll do this right now to make sure...stay tuned.
On Feb 16, 2008 11:59 AM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2008 8:32 AM, Wendy Sm
On Feb 16, 2008 8:32 AM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And we need to remove (or comment out) all of the repositories in the
> struts2-parent pom. Otherwise anyone who depends on s2 will get all
> those repositories added to their build. They shouldn't be necessary
> this close to a r
On Feb 16, 2008 7:19 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've cleared all but a couple issues out of Struts 2.1.1, so I think
> we are ready for a release. The only kinda blocking issue is the
> portlet tests failing, but that seems to have something to do with the
> setup, not our portlet
Nevermind on this one. Classpath issue. Guess I should have looked first
:)
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Blake Byrnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't logged this yet, but is anyone else noticing that package level
> properties files are not being found right now? My whole project s
I would like to fix the failing portlet test. I hope to get some time
tonight or tomorrow to look more into it.
Nils-H
On Feb 16, 2008 3:19 PM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've cleared all but a couple issues out of Struts 2.1.1, so I think
> we are ready for a release. The only kinda
2008/2/16, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Any objections to rolling a release(*) in the next day or so?
To release, see the new *easier* instructions to roll out a release:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Creating+and+Signing+a+Struts+2.1.x+Distribution
Obviously I am open to all q
I haven't logged this yet, but is anyone else noticing that package level
properties files are not being found right now? My whole project stopped
finding anything that was not in my global resources file. I haven't gotten
a chance to dig around in JIRA or in the app yet.
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 a
I still want to fix WW-2441, it's minor and I doubt anyone would even
notice it, but still, it makes us look bad if the interactive demo is
broken. I'm gonna fix it right now, so it shouldn't be a problem.
-Wes
On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 01:19 +1100, Don Brown wrote:
> I've cleared all but a couple is
I've cleared all but a couple issues out of Struts 2.1.1, so I think
we are ready for a release. The only kinda blocking issue is the
portlet tests failing, but that seems to have something to do with the
setup, not our portlet code, so we could even punt that one.
Any objections to rolling a rel
61 matches
Mail list logo
