Re: Struts 2.3.x - a new release

> From: Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org> > To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org>, > Date: 09.10.2015 17:55 > Subject: Struts 2.3.x - a new release > > Hi, > > I am going to spend some time on preparing a new 2.3.x release, there >

Re: Struts 2.3.x - a new release

2015-10-12 12:57 GMT+02:00 Christoph Nenning : > Can I still cherrypick changes from PRs 54 and 55 to support-2-3 ? It isn't possible :) I meant, XWork was moved into struts-core so cherry-picking will create a file in wrong place. You can manually apply the change.

Re: Struts 2.3.x - a new release

2015-10-12 13:31 GMT+02:00 Christoph Nenning : >> > Can I still cherrypick changes from PRs 54 and 55 to support-2-3 ? >> >> It isn't possible :) I meant, XWork was moved into struts-core so >> cherry-picking will create a file in wrong place. You can manually >>

Re: Struts 2.3.x - a new release

> > Can I still cherrypick changes from PRs 54 and 55 to support-2-3 ? > > It isn't possible :) I meant, XWork was moved into struts-core so > cherry-picking will create a file in wrong place. You can manually > apply the change. > Oh, yes. Nasty details. > > Or is it too late for that? > >

Re: Struts 2.3.x - a new release

2015-10-10 11:08 GMT+02:00 Johannes Geppert : > Hi, > > I think SMI has a high impact and should be better a feature for 2.5 only. > Cause this can break some existing apps and is may not a "drop in" upgrade > only. You are right :) Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122

Re: Struts 2.3.x - a new release

Hi, I think SMI has a high impact and should be better a feature for 2.5 only. Cause this can break some existing apps and is may not a "drop in" upgrade only. Johannes Am 09.10.2015 5:56 nachm. schrieb "Lukasz Lenart" : > Hi, > > I am going to spend some time on

Struts 2.3.x - a new release

Hi, I am going to spend some time on preparing a new 2.3.x release, there is already few issues registered. All the work will be performed in the "struts-2-3" branch. I am also wondering if I should merge the changes with Strict Method Invocation into to that branch?

Re: Struts 2.3.x - a new release

I meant the "support-2-3" branch ;-) 2015-10-09 17:56 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart : > Hi, > > I am going to spend some time on preparing a new 2.3.x release, there > is already few issues registered. All the work will be performed in > the "struts-2-3" branch. I am also

Re: Struts 2.3.x - a new release

Woops! Just noticed that I have created the branch based on "master" but I should use some of the STRUTS_2_3_x tags, will do it right now. 2015-10-09 17:58 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart : > I meant the "support-2-3" branch ;-) > > 2015-10-09 17:56 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart

Re: Time to start new release

2014-03-31 9:35 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber gregh3...@gmail.com: when will it be available at repositories repository idapache.nexus/id nameASF Nexus Staging/name urlhttps://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging//url /repository /repositories It's already there Regards

Re: Time to start new release

://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.3.17 Please take a look if everything is ok. Thanks! 2014-03-28 21:56 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: 56 issues solved, time to start a new release :-) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW/fixforversion/12324780

Re: Time to start new release

Version Notes https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.3.17 Please take a look if everything is ok. Thanks! 2014-03-28 21:56 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: 56 issues solved, time to start a new release :-) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW

Re: Time to start new release

/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.3.17 Please take a look if everything is ok. Thanks! 2014-03-28 21:56 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: 56 issues solved, time to start a new release :-) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW/fixforversion/12324780/ 2014-03-27 12:17 GMT

Re: Time to start new release

: 56 issues solved, time to start a new release :-) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW/fixforversion/12324780/ 2014-03-27 12:17 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: Ok, 12 issues left https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20WW%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D

Re: Time to start new release

56 issues solved, time to start a new release :-) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW/fixforversion/12324780/ 2014-03-27 12:17 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: Ok, 12 issues left https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20WW%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D

Re: Time to start new release

https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+%3D+WW+AND+fixVersion+%3D+2.3.17+AND+status+%3D+Open+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC 2014-03-06 22:30 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: Hi, Time to start work on new release, any important issues to solve and include in the release

Re: Time to start new release

Those issues (in most cases) will be solves with 2.3.17 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+%3D+WW+AND+fixVersion+%3D+2.3.17+AND+status+%3D+Open+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC 2014-03-06 22:30 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: Hi, Time to start work on new release, any

Time to start new release

Hi, Time to start work on new release, any important issues to solve and include in the release? Thus probably will be the last 2.3.x - next will be 2.5.x (minor code cleanup) or 3.0 (large refactorings) Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl

Re: A new release

, let's start preparing a new release ... ;-) Kind regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Kapituła Javarsovia http://javarsovia.pl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional

Re: A new release

2011/2/17 Wendy Smoak wsm...@gmail.com: As release manager you can frame the vote however you want.  If you have specific reasons for calling it a Beta release (unfinished feature, API not yet locked down,) then you can mention them.  It's unlikely the rest of the dev team will revolt and

Re: A new release

W dniu 17 lutego 2011 16:07 użytkownik Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com napisał: Why not RCn? Fine for me, RC or Beta it's just a signal to community, work in progress, stay tune Kind regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Kapituła Javarsovia http://javarsovia.pl

Re: A new release

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: The answer is simple: I'm using Maven for development basis and it's easy for me to switch between versions. I don't need to go to a web page to check if 2.2.2 is a Beta or GA. I see it just in my pom. But

Re: A new release

requested a new release, especially that the most important bugs are done. So I can just postpone those bugs and prepare a new release or start a new thread about changing labeling. Hmmm preparing a new release will be faster ;-) Besides it's more about promoting a release. I was asking about

Re: A new release

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: I was looking for that discussion about labeling but didn't find, could you help and point to the right direction ? Maybe it was on PMC group ? I poked around on MarkMail and found some discussion in late 2004.

Re: A new release

to JSONPlugin (not everyone uses) or development improvement. Few users requested a new release, especially that the most important bugs are done. So I can just postpone those bugs and prepare a new release or start a new thread about changing labeling. Hmmm preparing a new release

Re: A new release

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: 2011/1/31 Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org: He he.. I'll give you the answer that I got whenever I wanted to do beta releases. Votes determine the quality of the release, not the version label. So 2.2.2 could

Re: A new release

2011/1/31 Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org: He he.. I'll give you the answer that I got whenever I wanted to do beta releases. Votes determine the quality of the release, not the version label. So 2.2.2 could be production if it's voted that way. When you put out your vote, ask: [ ] GA [

A new release

Hi all! What about releasing a new version, say 2.2.2-BETA1 ? Kind regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Kapituła Javarsovia http://javarsovia.pl - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: A new release

He he.. I'll give you the answer that I got whenever I wanted to do beta releases. Votes determine the quality of the release, not the version label. So 2.2.2 could be production if it's voted that way. When you put out your vote, ask: [ ] GA [ ] Beta [ ] Alpha If it's GA, it's production.

OGNL 3.0 and new release

Hi, The new release is blocked by OGNL 3.0 right now - it's still not in central repo. The rest of issues are quite simple to solve and I would be ready to make the release very soon. There were two or three major issues solved with OGNL release and I think they are imported to improve Struts 2

Re: New release

I registered a Wish to upload OGNL 3.0 to Maven Central repo, after that I will be able to make a release. Regards -- Łukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Kapituła Javarsovia 2010 http://javarsovia.pl - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: New release

2010/3/16 Dale Newfield d...@newfield.org: 151 and 157 appear to have fixes in the issues...any chance we can incorporate them, too? I don't know how to test them, without real test cases I will not implement those changes! I made used below test case for 151 and it went smoothly with and

Re: New release

Thanks for working on this, Łukasz! -Dale - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org

Re: New release

I noticed that we have branches for 2.x and 2.1.x. Should I make a branch for 2.2.x as well after releasing it or before? Regards -- Łukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Kapituła Javarsovia 2010 http://javarsovia.pl - To

Re: New release

I made a new release of OGNL 3.0, right now I'm trying to push it into central repo? Regards -- Łukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Kapituła Javarsovia 2010 http://javarsovia.pl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

Re: New release

On Tuesday 16. March 2010 11.04.29 Lukasz Lenart wrote: I made a new release of OGNL 3.0, right now I'm trying to push it into central repo? Can you post a link to changes in 3.0? -- Andreas Joseph Krogh andr...@officenet.no Senior Software Developer / CTO

Re: New release

2010/3/16 Andreas Joseph Krogh andr...@officenet.no: On Tuesday 16. March 2010 11.04.29 Lukasz Lenart wrote: I made a new release of OGNL 3.0, right now I'm trying to push it into central repo? Can you post a link to changes in 3.0? http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa

Re: New release

I'm planning to merge 2.1.9 to 2.2.0 in JIRA to make a clean up and drop 2.1.9 from RoadMap, any doubts? Regards -- Łukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Kapituła Javarsovia 2010 http://javarsovia.pl - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: New release

Lukasz Lenart wrote: Andreas Joseph Krogh asked: Can you post a link to changes in 3.0? http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=10090fixfor=21770 except 145 - I thing it's a work for future 151 and 157 appear to have fixes in the issues...any chance we can

Re: New release

will this be 2.1.9 or 2.2.0 ? On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I want to make a new release of Struts 2 project. The steps are as follow: - release new OGNL version 3.0 - move Struts 2 archetypes inside Struts 2 main folder

Re: New release

On Today at 11:12pm, LL=Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: LL Hi, LL LL I want to make a new release of Struts 2 project. The steps are as follow: LL - release new OGNL version 3.0 LL - move Struts 2 archetypes inside Struts 2 main folder (as it was with XWork) LL - make

Re: New release

2010/3/11 Haroon Rafique haroon.rafi...@utoronto.ca: Any chance XW-737 can be fixed (patch available) and made part of the release? Solved, thanks! Regards -- Łukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Kapituła Javarsovia 2010 http://javarsovia.pl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30997] New: - Release notes reference ActionErrors as deprecated

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30997. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.