Re: In regards to Struts 2 Validation.

2007-12-12 Thread Tom Schneider
I have plenty of examples from our application. The first is a case where the user must enter at least one phone number and if the type of phone is selected, then the user must enter a phone number. The validation code is as follows: if(!hasFieldErrors("exampleData.phoneNumber1") && !

Re: In regards to Struts 2 Validation.

2007-12-12 Thread Ted Husted
rum_id=488109 > > > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 03:38:50 -0800> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > > dev@struts.apache.org> Subject: Re: In regards to Struts 2 Validation.> > > > Hmmm, I'd say that it's still a safe bet that Hibernate Validator will> > > have

RE: In regards to Struts 2 Validation.

2007-12-12 Thread Bob Tiernay
sonal thoughts have been captured here (just replace the word "OVal" with "Struts2 Validation"): http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1889936&forum_id=488109 > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 03:38:50 -0800> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > dev@struts.apache

Re: In regards to Struts 2 Validation.

2007-12-11 Thread Ted Husted
Hmmm, I'd say that it's still a safe bet that Hibernate Validator will have a "profound effect" on JSR 303, akin to JPA and Hibernate Core. I've seen posts on the Hibernate list that imply JSR 303 will be backwardly compatible with HV. -Ted. On Dec 10, 2007 4:37 PM, Bob Tiernay <[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: In regards to Struts 2 Validation.

2007-12-10 Thread Bob Tiernay
I believe that OVal will soon be a referenced as existing technology for this JSR: http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1640398&forum_id=488109 As far as I can tell, they have the most powerful set of features including support for: - AOP (AspectJ) - Spring integration (Validatio

Re: In regards to Struts 2 Validation.

2007-12-10 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Dec 10, 2007 7:02 AM, Philip Luppens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 9, 2007 7:42 AM, Tom Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just wanted to chime in here. I have very specific goals that I am > > trying to achieve, so I thought I would explain them in detail. (this > > is something I

Re: In regards to Struts 2 Validation.

2007-12-09 Thread Philip Luppens
On Dec 9, 2007 7:42 AM, Tom Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just wanted to chime in here. I have very specific goals that I am > trying to achieve, so I thought I would explain them in detail. (this > is something I've been tasked with at work) > [snip] > > So that's where I'm currently at

Re: In regards to Struts 2 Validation.

2007-12-08 Thread Tom Schneider
Just wanted to chime in here. I have very specific goals that I am trying to achieve, so I thought I would explain them in detail. (this is something I've been tasked with at work) 1. We have a core product that is 'customized' for several client implementations. Validation is an area where

In regards to Struts 2 Validation.

2007-12-08 Thread rburton
appreciated! Struts 2 => :rules: Best Regards, Richard L. Burton III P.S. I hate being at work on Sunday morning at 1 AM EST time to do a migration. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/In-regards-to-Struts-2-Validation.-tp14235953p14235953.html Sent from the Struts -