pt., 6 paź 2023 o 11:22 Kusal Kithul-Godage
napisał(a):
> So if I'm understanding correctly, we lack sufficient ownership and
> control over the release process at commons-ognl.
Rather they have more strict process which requires some extra work to
get approval, eg. you must keep changes.xml up &
Thanks for clarifying Lukasz.
So if I'm understanding correctly, we lack sufficient ownership and
control over the release process at commons-ognl.
I do still think it's worthwhile to try and unify these projects.
Having the project under an 'orphan' org does not inspire confidence
in its mainten
pon., 18 wrz 2023 o 10:16 Kusal Kithul-Godage
napisał(a):
> I am looking for some clarification regarding the maintenance status
> of the OGNL library which is currently listed under the 'Orphan OSS'
> GitHub org.
>
> I understand this library was previously adopted by Apache Commons
> where it re
Hi all,
I am looking for some clarification regarding the maintenance status
of the OGNL library which is currently listed under the 'Orphan OSS'
GitHub org.
I understand this library was previously adopted by Apache Commons
where it received little active development.
What I don't quite underst
