Re: Agitator Licenses for Struts Committers

2006-04-25 Thread Dakota Jack
Do you ever discuss the issues Mitchell? Struts is in large part a quagmire due to an attempt to give the branding to JSF for Craig via Shale. No one not in the long term know or even in the long term know can now see what the future is. No code On 4/25/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

Re: Agitator Licenses for Struts Committers

2006-04-25 Thread Dakota Jack
This is crap. Read the record. Do you guys even care if you make sense? On 4/25/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You're welcome to advertise any product you like. Please prefix it > with [Announce] or [Ann], but that's not required. Do you have a > product you'd like to sell?

Re: Agitator Licenses for Struts Committers

2006-04-25 Thread James Mitchell
Yep, I agree. You wouldn't believe the commission percentage that Craig gets whenever he sells a free copy of Java Studio Creator. I'm impressed that you noticed that toowow. -- James Mitchell On Apr 25, 2006, at 7:50 AM, Dakota Jack wrote: There is a big difference between having

Re: Agitator Licenses for Struts Committers

2006-04-25 Thread James Mitchell
You're welcome to advertise any product you like. Please prefix it with [Announce] or [Ann], but that's not required. Do you have a product you'd like to sell? -- James Mitchell On Apr 25, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Dakota Jack wrote: We can advertise our wares here? I did not know that. I th

Re: Agitator Licenses for Struts Committers

2006-04-25 Thread Dakota Jack
We can advertise our wares here? I did not know that. I thought this list was about Struts and not about Ted's business. But, excuse me. I should have known that Craig was not the exception in using the list that way. On 4/25/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, let's review s

Re: Agitator Licenses for Struts Committers

2006-04-25 Thread Dakota Jack
There is a big difference between having an open source project that is used for business and using your position on the list to promote your business ideas on the list. How about we begin selling our sites on this list? If you cannot see the difference in this, then you just are not being honest

Re: Agitator Licenses for Struts Committers

2006-04-25 Thread Ted Husted
On 4/25/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, let's review shall we. > > >> ... for our committers to use on open source projects... > >> > > What part of that says anything about personal gain? I seem to remember the term "personal gain" from the TV series "Charmed', but I for one a

Re: Agitator Licenses for Struts Committers

2006-04-25 Thread James Mitchell
Ok, let's review shall we. ... for our committers to use on open source projects... What part of that says anything about personal gain? -- James Mitchell On Apr 25, 2006, at 12:50 AM, Dakota Jack wrote: Isn't this using the committer status for personal gain? On 4/23/06, Ted Husted

Re: Agitator Licenses for Struts Committers

2006-04-24 Thread Dakota Jack
Isn't this using the committer status for personal gain? On 4/23/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Agitar Software (http://www.agitar.com/) has donated several licenses > for its Agitator product to Apache Struts for our committers to use > on open source projects. The Agitator inclu