> I suggest to leave the default behaviour as-is for now, but give the
> guys who want it a switch somewhere.
>
That is a given.
musachy
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh
wrote:
> On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:31:46 Ronny Løvtangen wrote:
>> On Dec 11, 2008, at 11:26 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
>>
>> > The problem with your suggestion is that it works for simple, and
>> > specific cases, but given OGNL "p
On Friday 12 December 2008 01:30:13 Musachy Barroso wrote:
> I second Dave's opinion. Patches are always welcomed.
Great!
Just wanted to make sure that our effort has a chance of being included in
"main-struts" before we get on with the task.
You'll hear from us, but it won't be tomorrow:-)
--
I second Dave's opinion. Patches are always welcomed.
musachy
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Dave Newton wrote:
> --- On Thu, 12/11/08, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
>> Will patches implementing this get accepted?
>
> How can we answer that before getting the patches? I, for one, would probably
--- On Thu, 12/11/08, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> Will patches implementing this get accepted?
How can we answer that before getting the patches? I, for one, would probably
evaluate such a patch: as long as it doesn't break anything else, and
particularly if it solves indexed properties correc
Didn't get that far... Couldn't get past requirement a) of part one ;)
Nils-H
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh
wrote:
> On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:40:51 Ronny Løvtangen wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 11, 2008, at 11:21 PM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik wrote:
>>
>> > As mentioned, I r
On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:46:14 Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:40:51 Ronny Løvtangen wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 11, 2008, at 11:21 PM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik wrote:
> >
> > > As mentioned, I realized that just _after_ pressing the send button,
> > > so please igno
--- On Thu, 12/11/08, Ronny Løvtangen wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2008, at 11:26 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > what would the name be in that case?
>
> How would you handle the request parameters from this form?
Indexed properties are built by hand; a shortcoming:
On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:40:51 Ronny Løvtangen wrote:
>
> On Dec 11, 2008, at 11:21 PM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik wrote:
>
> > As mentioned, I realized that just _after_ pressing the send button,
> > so please ignore my ignorance ;)
>
> Alright, you're on!
> For those that aren't, take a lo
On Dec 11, 2008, at 11:21 PM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik wrote:
As mentioned, I realized that just _after_ pressing the send button,
so please ignore my ignorance ;)
Alright, you're on!
For those that aren't, take a look at the original explanation of
nested tags in Struts 1 from Aaron Bates:
On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:31:46 Ronny Løvtangen wrote:
>
> On Dec 11, 2008, at 11:26 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
>
> > The problem with your suggestion is that it works for simple, and
> > specific cases, but given OGNL "power", there is a large way of cases
> > when it would break. Like
> >
> How would you handle the request parameters from this form?
> Most of the time you don't do such power OGNL expressions in a form, you're
> just interested in updating some objects in a collection.
>
My point is that the problem with this approach, is the assumption
that the name is similar to t
On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:31:59 Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:26:02 Musachy Barroso wrote:
> > The problem with your suggestion is that it works for simple, and
> > specific cases, but given OGNL "power", there is a large way of cases
> > when it would break. L
On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:26:02 Musachy Barroso wrote:
> The problem with your suggestion is that it works for simple, and
> specific cases, but given OGNL "power", there is a large way of cases
> when it would break. Like
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> what would the nam
On Dec 11, 2008, at 11:26 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
The problem with your suggestion is that it works for simple, and
specific cases, but given OGNL "power", there is a large way of cases
when it would break. Like
what would the name be in that case?
How woul
lmao, we cant be too serious here.
musachy
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Dave Newton wrote:
> What is this, some sort of Norwegian revolt?
>
>
> --- On Thu, 12/11/08, Ronny Løvtangen wrote:
>
>> From: Ronny Løvtangen
>> Subject: Re: Nested-tag support
>
As mentioned, I realized that just _after_ pressing the send button,
so please ignore my ignorance ;)
Nils-H
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:18 PM, Ronny Løvtangen wrote:
>
> On Dec 11, 2008, at 10:42 PM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik wrote:
>
>>>
>>> The s:form equivalent of the nested-example above shoul
On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:21:23 Dave Newton wrote:
> What is this, some sort of Norwegian revolt?
You're on!
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficult thing i
The problem with your suggestion is that it works for simple, and
specific cases, but given OGNL "power", there is a large way of cases
when it would break. Like
what would the name be in that case?
musachy
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh
On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:15:35 Musachy Barroso wrote:
> Now I see what you mean. What 'push' does is to put a value on top of
> the stack. The name attribute is a string, not an expression, and
> doesn't use the stack for anything. That is why it wouldn't work.
> There is a simple workaround
What is this, some sort of Norwegian revolt?
--- On Thu, 12/11/08, Ronny Løvtangen wrote:
> From: Ronny Løvtangen
> Subject: Re: Nested-tag support
> To: "Struts Developers List"
> Date: Thursday, December 11, 2008, 5:18 PM
> On Dec 11, 2008, at 10:42 PM, Nils
On Dec 11, 2008, at 10:42 PM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik wrote:
The s:form equivalent of the nested-example above should be
something like:
Wouldn't to the trick?
Yes, but what if you want to reuse code for the form fields for an
address and
On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:07:53 Musachy Barroso wrote:
> Now I see what you mean. What 'push' does is to put a value on top of
> the stack. The name attribute is a string, not an expression, and
> doesn't use the stack for anything. That is why it wouldn't work.
Yes, that's why it doesn't wo
Yeah, I just didn't understand the question until after I sent the email :)
Nils-H
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> it does, but the point it to make it less redundant, when you have
> many fields in one block, like the "with" keyword in some languages
> (Pascal? VB?)
>
Now I see what you mean. What 'push' does is to put a value on top of
the stack. The name attribute is a string, not an expression, and
doesn't use the stack for anything. That is why it wouldn't work.
There is a simple workaround tho,
you can set a variable for it like:
.
or even
I
--- On Thu, 12/11/08, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> On Thursday 11 December 2008 22:36:37 Musachy Barroso wrote:
> > I am sort if confused here, what are the advantages of this?
>
>
>
>
> [...]
The issue is the generation of the form element name, the input element value
stuff would a
On Thursday 11 December 2008 22:52:06 Musachy Barroso wrote:
> > Have you ever used the nested-tags in Struts-1.1?
>
> Just for a few months to add it to my resume :)
I've been depending on the nested-tags for years:-)
> > This example is rather simple, but in much more complicated forms, inside
On Thursday 11 December 2008 22:42:48 Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik wrote:
> >
> > The s:form equivalent of the nested-example above should be something like:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Wouldn't to the trick?
Yes, ofcourse, but that's exactly wh
it does, but the point it to make it less redundant, when you have
many fields in one block, like the "with" keyword in some languages
(Pascal? VB?)
musachy
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik
wrote:
>>
>> The s:form equivalent of the nested-example above should be something
>
> The s:form equivalent of the nested-example above should be something like:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Wouldn't to the trick?
Nils-H
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.ap
> Have you ever used the nested-tags in Struts-1.1?
Just for a few months to add it to my resume :)
> This example is rather simple, but in much more complicated forms, inside
> iterators for example, where you want to reuse JSPs it is >*extremely* useful
> to avoid code-douplication. Much easi
On Thursday 11 December 2008 22:36:37 Musachy Barroso wrote:
> I am sort if confused here, what are the advantages of this?
Have you ever used the nested-tags in Struts-1.1?
The advantage is that the value of the "name"-attribute is calculated for you.
That way you can write:
I am sort if confused here, what are the advantages of this?
musachy
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh
wrote:
> Anyone?
> I really would like to see this included sooner than later and would
> appreciate any feedback.
>
> On Thursday 11 December 2008 13:18:20 Andreas Joseph
Anyone?
I really would like to see this included sooner than later and would appreciate
any feedback.
On Thursday 11 December 2008 13:18:20 Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> Hi all!
> One of the most usefull things about (2.0 < Struts >= 1.1) is the
> nested-tag-library. It allows you to do:
>
>
>
34 matches
Mail list logo
