Let's close this discussion now, we can come back to it when users
will start to complain ;-)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
-
To unsubscrib
This change can simple lower users' confusion and I suggested it base
on my experience. Sometime ago I was developing application with CDI
and RESTeasy - both have @Produces annotation and it was very annoying
to discover such a mistake during unit tests or even UI tests. It's
silly, but it happene
See inline
Am 08.07.11 19:53, schrieb Wes Wannemacher:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
>> I would leave it alone. Hibernate has many custom annotations with the
>> same name as JPA annotations... if you need both, one needs to be
>> fully qualified.
>>
>
> I agree with Pau
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> A while back, I remember Don Brown mentioning that it is a good idea
> to keep the IoC/DI of the framework separate from the IoC/DI available
> for users. I agree with this sentiment.
I'm not sure about that, although I see the point... I'
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> I would leave it alone. Hibernate has many custom annotations with the
> same name as JPA annotations... if you need both, one needs to be
> fully qualified.
>
I agree with Paul, one of the benefits of having packages is the
ability to have c
I would leave it alone. Hibernate has many custom annotations with the
same name as JPA annotations... if you need both, one needs to be
fully qualified.
As developers prefer CDI over XWork annotations, then Struts' @Inject
will fall out of use.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Jeff Black wrote:
Since it is part of XWork would @XInject be more appropriate? Just asking.
From: Łukasz Lenart
To: Struts Developers List
Sent: Fri, July 8, 2011 6:11:23 AM
Subject: Rename @Inject to @StrutsInject
Hi,
I was going to call for a Vote over bringing CDI plugin
