Now I have started thinking about upgrading/redoing the Tiles 3 plugin
and the problem is with conflicting dependencies. Also, it looks like
Tiles 3 can handle Tiles 2 definitions, so I'm wondering if it makes
sense to drop the Tiles plugin and replace it with the Tiles 3 plugin.
My work on upgradi
2015-11-19 10:46 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> 2015-11-17 12:53 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart :
>> I'm working on upgrading Tiles plugin to use the latest Tiles 2.x
>> version - 2.2.2 - and it looks like the only thing is to drop all the
>> custom code from the plugin, just leave TilesResult.
>>
>> Tiles 2
2015-11-21 1:20 GMT+01:00 Ken McWilliams :
> Everything sounds great. I do recommend keeping the regex matching. I it's
> hard to know which types of view support should be dropped, I think it is
> better to err on the side of inclusion.
Yes, support for RegEx will follow
> On another front, don'
Everything sounds great. I do recommend keeping the regex matching. I it's
hard to know which types of view support should be dropped, I think it is
better to err on the side of inclusion.
On another front, don't you like how they select the type of matcher by
using a prefix in the string? "OGNL:"
2015-11-20 7:43 GMT+01:00 Christoph Nenning :
> I'm not so deep into tiles to have a strong opinion. But that makes a lot
> of sense to me. Can this be shared between tiles2 and tiles3 plugins?
Yes, I think after gathering all the knowledge about Tiles I'm gonna
update the Tiles 3 Plugin as well :
> > I'm working on upgrading Tiles plugin to use the latest Tiles 2.x
> > version - 2.2.2 - and it looks like the only thing is to drop all the
> > custom code from the plugin, just leave TilesResult.
> >
> > Tiles 2.2.2 contains support for FreeMarker (the Struts custom is
> > doing that) plus few
2015-11-17 12:53 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> I'm working on upgrading Tiles plugin to use the latest Tiles 2.x
> version - 2.2.2 - and it looks like the only thing is to drop all the
> custom code from the plugin, just leave TilesResult.
>
> Tiles 2.2.2 contains support for FreeMarker (the Struts c
Thanks Ken for all your insights :)
2015-11-17 18:59 GMT+01:00 Ken McWilliams :
> I could be mistaken but I think 2.2.2 added direct support for OGNL (MVEL,
> freemarker, and many others), which is pretty interesting. This was the
> last step before what looks like a cleanup and some refactoring t
I could be mistaken but I think 2.2.2 added direct support for OGNL (MVEL,
freemarker, and many others), which is pretty interesting. This was the
last step before what looks like a cleanup and some refactoring that
resulted in Tiles 3 (It also has the same EL/Template support). If you're
putting i
