On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am still interested in patching Struts 1.x bugs as they come in and
> queuing up releases. The delay between 1.3.8 and 1.3.10 was my doubt that I
> can count on +3 binding votes for the 1.x releases.
I'll make time to
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 2:46 AM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PMC folk,
>
> I am still interested in patching Struts 1.x bugs as they come in and
> queuing up releases. The delay between 1.3.8 and 1.3.10 was my doubt that I
> can count on +3 binding votes for the 1.x releases. Even
I'm not as concerned with "free-loaders" so much as I am with whether
there are actually very many people out there who really need these
new releases.
I don't mind helping test out a new build and voting based on that,
but I don't have any 1.3 apps in production that I can test/verify
with.
On
I still work on Struts 1.3 projects. So I keep evolving 1.3 (and put
everything in HEAD) also.
Paul
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:54 AM, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 2008/3/9, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I am still interested in patching Struts 1.x bugs as they come in an
2008/3/9, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am still interested in patching Struts 1.x bugs as they come in and
> queuing up releases. The delay between 1.3.8 and 1.3.10 was my doubt that I
> can count on +3 binding votes for the 1.x releases. Even if Struts 2 is the
> craze, I still am in
PMC folk,
I am still interested in patching Struts 1.x bugs as they come in and
queuing up releases. The delay between 1.3.8 and 1.3.10 was my doubt that I
can count on +3 binding votes for the 1.x releases. Even if Struts 2 is the
craze, I still am interested in tweaking 1.x for the large communi
