Re: voting on 2.1.8.1

2009-10-11 Thread Martin Cooper
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote: > > Hey guys, > There was a recent discussion after 2.1.8 that we should post builds and > leave them available for a while before calling a vote... I could be > misremembering, but I think Martin indicated that a build should sit for a > few

Re: voting on 2.1.8.1

2009-10-09 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote: > There was a recent discussion after 2.1.8 that we should post builds and > leave them available for a while before calling a vote... I could be > misremembering, but I think Martin indicated that a build should sit for a > few weeks while pe

Re: voting on 2.1.8.1

2009-10-09 Thread Musachy Barroso
I think we are good to go. musachy On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote: > > Hey guys, > There was a recent discussion after 2.1.8 that we should post builds and > leave them available for a while before calling a vote... I could be > misremembering, but I think Martin indicated

voting on 2.1.8.1

2009-10-09 Thread Wes Wannemacher
Hey guys, There was a recent discussion after 2.1.8 that we should post builds and leave them available for a while before calling a vote... I could be misremembering, but I think Martin indicated that a build should sit for a few weeks while people test. In the case of 2.1.8.1, I only made change