On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:43:58 -0500, Durham David R Jr Contr 805 CSPTS/SCE wrote:
>On this subject, has anyone mentioned anything about conversion
>utilities from Struts 1.x to Struts 2.0? I'm thinking it would make
>sense to design and develop these kinds of tools along side the
>Struts 2.0 develo
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:55:29 +0200, bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well I don't contribute to struts but I have to say that one of the
> distinguishing
> features of the ( less mature ) springframework is that action forms don't have
> to inherit a concrete class.
>
> There has been a lot of c
Well I don't contribute to struts but I have to say that one of the
distinguishing
features of the ( less mature ) springframework is that action forms don't have
to inherit a concrete class.
There has been a lot of criticism of this ( ActionForm etc ) in the past.
I think it would be a very ba
> There are no guarantees for the future but the
> convention in Struts is that we maintain backward compatibility and
IMO
> someone would have to have good reason to remove it and break
compatibility
> once it has been "released"- at least in the 1.x.x series (Struts 2.0
> revolution is another ca
d and configure Struts to use your custom implementation.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "bryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 3:05 PM
Subject: wrapping of POJO's with WrapDyanBean
> Hello and sorry
Hello and sorry to disturb everyone,
I want to use Niall Pemberton's wrapping on POJO's addition to
struts for my application.
I personally see it as a great idea that removes one of the main
reasons why I might use spring over struts ie having to inherit
from ActionForm or whatever.
Howev
