[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogMappedBeans

Date: 2004-04-26T00:28:42 Editor: 131.191.40.91 <> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsCatalogMappedBeans URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogMappedBeans no comment Change Log: -- @@ -15,7

Struts-Validator

Hi folks, a question: the struts"handbook" (webpage...) tells, that requiredIf is deprecated, but javadoc (FieldChecks.java also) doesn't have deprecated inside ? am i missing something ? cheers, Matthias -- Matthias Weßendorf Aechterhoek 18 D-48282 Emsdetten Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogInstrumentableForms

Date: 2004-04-26T03:13:48 Editor: 131.191.40.91 <> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsCatalogInstrumentableForms URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogInstrumentableForms no comment Change Log:

RE: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogInstrumentableForms

allows you to instrument your ActionForms I dont really grok the use of the term 'instrument' in this context. Can someone explain? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 26 April 2004 18:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Apache Struts Wiki]

TilesServlet deleted /

Is TilesServlet delete from new struts and why ? regards - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: TilesServlet deleted

Tiles is integrated with Struts so TilesServlet is no longer needed. David --- snpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is TilesServlet delete from new struts and why ? > > regards > __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital

RE: TilesServlet deleted

So if tiles were extracted out into it's own commons project - would there be a need/reason to add this back in? Matt > -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 7:40 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: TilesServlet delete

Re: TilesServlet deleted

I want direct tiles with JSF and I need TilesServlet Please, back in regards On Monday 26 April 2004 01:40 pm, David Graham wrote: > Tiles is integrated with Struts so TilesServlet is no longer needed. > > David > > --- snpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is TilesServlet delete from new struts

RE: TilesServlet deleted

hi, did you look here: http://www.lifl.fr/~dumoulin/tiles/ i guess the TilesServlet will be in bin/src-distribution Cheers, Matthias > -Original Message- > From: snpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 8:03 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: TilesSer

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28023] - where values have embedded quotes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28606] New: - nested inside a is null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28606] - nested inside a is null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28606] - nested inside a is null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28609] New: - Scriptable Actions Support

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28609] - Scriptable Actions Support

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28609] - Scriptable Actions Support

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: TilesServlet deleted

If a Commons Tiles product bundled a servlet (and/or a filter), as we do with Commons Chain, then I'm sure that people wanting to use Tiles with JSF could just use that one. Anytime you're ready to volunteer, Matt, just say the word :) -Ted. On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 07:43:33 -0600, Matt Raible wrote

RE: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogInstrumentableForms

> -Original Message- > From: Andrew Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 3:20 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: RE: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: > StrutsCatalogInstrumentableForms > > > > allows you to instrument your ActionForms > > > I dont really gr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28609] - Scriptable Actions Support

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28609] - Scriptable Actions Support

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: TilesServlet deleted

IMO, commons is the wrong place for Tiles. I would support moving it into its own Jakarta project (again) if it meant more developer support for it. David --- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If a Commons Tiles product bundled a servlet (and/or a filter), as we do > with Commons Chain, th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28609] - Scriptable Actions Support

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Adding new Struts features/sub-projects (was [Bug 28609] - Scriptable Actions Support)

I'm posting this to the dev-list rather than carrying on with Bugzilla, since it looks like there might be some further discussion :-) I have no position on whether this should be considered core or an add-on, but if it's to be an add-on, why not bring it into Struts as a new sub-project? It would

RE: TilesServlet deleted

Again, Struts sub-project? It can always move later, to Jakarta or even a TLP. Steve > -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: April 26, 2004 7:50 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: RE: TilesServlet deleted > > > IMO, commons is the wrong place fo

RE: TilesServlet deleted

> -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 7:50 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: RE: TilesServlet deleted > > > IMO, commons is the wrong place for Tiles. That was my initial reaction as well, so I went off to look at the

RE: Adding new Struts features/sub-projects (was [Bug 28609] - Scriptable Actions Support)

> -Original Message- > From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 9:02 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Adding new Struts features/sub-projects (was [Bug 28609] - > Scriptable Actions Support) > > > I'm posting this to the dev-list rather than c

Re: Adding new Struts features/sub-projects (was [Bug 28609] - Scriptable Actions Support)

--- Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm posting this to the dev-list rather than carrying on with Bugzilla, > since it looks like there might be some further discussion :-) > > I have no position on whether this should be considered core or an > add-on, but if it's to be an add-on, why

Re: Adding new Struts features/sub-projects (was [Bug 28609] - Scriptable Actions Support)

The sad truth is that many teams that do use Struts cannot also use whatever other goody they find on SourceForge or on some other open source host. Many do have permission to use Struts, but getting permission to use another product is a difficult task. I believe we have an obligation to the c

RE: Adding new Struts features/sub-projects (was [Bug 28609] - Scriptable Actions Support)

Some ideas, not neccessarily complete or well-formed... > -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: April 26, 2004 9:44 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Adding new Struts features/sub-projects (was > [Bug 28609] - > Scriptable Actions Support)