[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction

2004-09-15 Thread dev
Date: 2004-09-15T00:13:03 Editor: MichaelMcGrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction no comment Change Log:

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction

2004-09-15 Thread dev
Date: 2004-09-15T00:31:12 Editor: MichaelMcGrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction no comment Change Log:

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsConsultants

2004-09-15 Thread dev
Date: 2004-09-15T06:23:03 Editor: BruceKissinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsConsultants URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsConsultants no comment Change Log: -- @@ -1

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31242] New: - Multipart request parameters lost when forwarding

2004-09-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Container- based security

2004-09-15 Thread jackie
Hello Everyone, Can anyone help me to setup a container based security in Struts application. I research that it involves using filter, then also the server authentication. Also a quote from this site, written by Ted Husted: http://www.jguru.com/faq/view.jsp?EID=471934 "Answer You can use

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction

2004-09-15 Thread dev
Date: 2004-09-15T07:13:52 Editor: MichaelMcGrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction no comment Change Log:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31242] - Multipart request parameters lost when forwarding

2004-09-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25434] - multipart/form-data loses all request parameters in action forward.

2004-09-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction

2004-09-15 Thread dev
Date: 2004-09-15T09:43:40 Editor: MichaelMcGrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction no comment Change Log:

Memory Leak in MappingDispatchAction?

2004-09-15 Thread Joe Germuska
Wanted to run this by some folks: Our largest Struts application has become a total memory hog. This has led our system administrator to take a crash source in the under-development JBoss profiler. We're not expert in reading the output of that, but it seems to point back to a lot of memory be

Discrepancy between 'Acquiring' and 'Download->Binaries'

2004-09-15 Thread Wendy Smoak
[resending from a subscribed address] Is this intentional? Acquiring has 1.1 and 1.2.4 listed: http://struts.apache.org/acquiring.html But if you go to Download->Binaries, it still has 1.2.2: http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi I'm guessing (from the .cgi extension) that the download page pic

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction

2004-09-15 Thread dev
Date: 2004-09-15T11:49:54 Editor: MichaelMcGrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction no comment Change Log:

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction

2004-09-15 Thread dev
Date: 2004-09-15T11:53:55 Editor: MichaelMcGrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction no comment Change Log:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31255] New: - say in which scope searched when "No bean found under attribute key" is issued

2004-09-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Discrepancy between 'Acquiring' and 'Download->Binaries'

2004-09-15 Thread Wendy S
Is this intentional? Acquiring has 1.1 and 1.2.4 listed: http://struts.apache.org/acquiring.html But if you go to Download->Binaries, it still has 1.2.2: http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi I'm guessing (from the .cgi extension) that the download page picks up the contents of some directory an

Re: Container- based security

2004-09-15 Thread struts Dude
You can try ServletFilter, http://www.securityfilter.org/, it's independent of container security, no need to touch server configuration file. And real easy to use. Try use it in combination with assigning roles to action mapping from struts-config.xml and with Filter ( i.e. implements Filter ),

Struts 1.2.4 Release

2004-09-15 Thread Niall Pemberton
I'm happy with Struts 1.2.4 version Martin posted. I've installed it in an existing webapp with no problems and the examples/mailreader/tiles-documentation webapps seem to work. Can we vote on releasing this version? Niall - T

[VOTE] Struts 1.2.4 Quality

2004-09-15 Thread Martin Cooper
The Struts 1.2.4 test build has been available for a few days now. Once you have had a chance to form an opinion on the quality of this build, please respond to the following vote. - Based on its quality, the Struts 1.2.4 build should be classified as: [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] General Availabi

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.4 Quality

2004-09-15 Thread Niall Pemberton
> The Struts 1.2.4 test build has been available for a few days now. Once > you have had a chance to form an opinion on the quality of this build, > please respond to the following vote. > > - > Based on its quality, the Struts 1.2.4 build should be classified as: > > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta >

Re: Discrepancy between 'Acquiring' and 'Download->Binaries'

2004-09-15 Thread Martin Cooper
It's not intentional. It's an accident of introducing our own download page and then backing out a GA release. Fixing the download page to reference 1.1 would be a nuisance, since 1.1 was a Jakarta release, and the download page is designed for Struts as a TLP. Since the vote just went out for

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.4 Quality

2004-09-15 Thread Martin Cooper
My own vote... On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Martin Cooper wrote: The Struts 1.2.4 test build has been available for a few days now. Once you have had a chance to form an opinion on the quality of this build, please respond to the following vote. - Based on its quality, the Struts 1.2.4 build should

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31255] - say in which scope searched when "No bean found under attribute key" is issued, which tag, which jsp line

2004-09-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu