Hello, Martin,
What I am saying is very simple, and I am not sure what is the difficulty.
As I've said, you are absolutely free to handle file uploads however you want.
The whole point is that this is not the case. The whole point is that
the present arrangement ties people to a specific way o
Hi ,
I have been using connection pool generated by struts using the parameters in
tags of struts-config.xml, (database used is mysql 4.0.18) in my web
application . Everything seems to be fine but at times the connections in the pool are
lost and application fails to work, there is no other
For anyone interested in an option, what I would like to do is given
below. Anyone have any suggestions on the best way to do this and still
use ActionForm, short of rewriting ActionForm? Thanks for any
assistance. (The UploadFileItem is just a simple Serialized wrapper of
commons' FileItem.
Michael,
I'd rather you didn't tell other people what my views are (as you seem to
get it wrong most of the time). Although I wrote most of the wiki page your
refer to, Martin Cooper added the warning.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Michael McGrady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts De
Niall Pemberton wrote:
Michael,
I'd rather you didn't tell other people what my views are (as you seem to
get it wrong most of the time). Although I wrote most of the wiki page your
refer to, Martin Cooper added the warning.
Niall
Thank you for that clarification, Niall. Martin, then, is the one t
I don t understand. As you see here
(http://struts.apache.org/api/org/apache/struts/upload/package-
frame.html) This package is almost deprecated in favor of commons-
fileupload.
Ok i have remove the method based on struts 1.1 example(example and code
that is remove on struts 1.2.2!!!), and i test
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project struts has an issue affecting its community integration.
Project State : 'Failed'
Fu
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project struts has an issue affecting its community integration.
Project State : 'Failed'
Fu
Hi Michael,
I don't understand you're proposal. FileItem (from commons upload) is
an interface with a factory. FileUploadBase (the parser) is abstract
with different implementations. Why would you wrap the interface
instead of simply creating a new concrete implementation of the above
mentioned
Hi,
I am getting these stange org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Content is not
allowed in prolog and I don't understand why...
Anybody would have a clue where I shoul start looking ? (I see nothing wrong in
my config XML files...)
I am trying to make a simple struts-portlet work...
Thanks in adv
portlet.xml :-)
Basically you have content (may be space or blank lines) before the
prolog . I've also heard of this error message
showing up if you had content after the prolog but before the open
root. (I've never seen that though ;-) Here's a forum that discusses
this issue.
http://forum.ja
Hi, Mike,
I respond to your thoughts within. I am not creating a proposal,
perhaps I should say. I am just trying to find a clean way to implement
a file upload application.
Mike Stanley wrote:
Hi Michael,
I don't understand you're proposal. FileItem (from commons upload) is
an interface with
I allready looked at this and the problem still remains. What is strange is
that I took the files from the struts-demo WebApp and modified them. So such
errors should not appear...
En réponse à Mike Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> portlet.xml :-)
>
> Basically you have content (may be space o
Can someone please commit these three patches?
TIA,
sean
Index: src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles/TilesRequestProcessor.java
===
RCS file:
/home/cvspublic/jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles/TilesRequestProcessor.java,v
At 10:56 AM -0400 10/5/04, Sean Schofield wrote:
Can someone please commit these three patches?
Please submit all patches as attachments to Bugzilla tickets. Email
transit almost inevitably results in corrupted patches.
Thanks
Joe
--
Joe Germuska
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bl
I think this should be on the users list. Commons-users list.
There are other file upload jars, such as Jason Hunter if this one does
not fit.
.V
(and... I do not see how file upload is a core competency of Struts,
it's similar to Tiles)
Michael McGrady wrote:
Hi, Mike,
I respond to your though
OK sorry about that. I submitted them a while back as bugzilla tickets
but nobody applied them. Can you apply them for me? (Bug#31230)
Thanks,
sean
Joe Germuska wrote:
Please submit all patches as attachments to Bugzilla tickets. Email
transit almost inevitably results in corrupted patches.
I was on the commons users list, Vic, and Martin Cooper suggested
strongly that I move to the struts lists. Isn't this essentially a
developer's issue? Thanks. Michael McGrady
Vic Cekvenich wrote:
I think this should be on the users list. Commons-users list.
There are other file upload jars,
I think Sean already has submitted these patches (see #31230) - he's
just doing a quick nag like Craig told him to :-)
-Original Message-
From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 October 2004 16:04
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixes deprecated reference
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project struts has an issue affecting its community integration.
Project State : 'Failed'
Fu
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project struts has an issue affecting its community integration.
Project State : 'Failed'
Fu
At 11:17 AM -0400 10/5/04, Sean Schofield wrote:
OK sorry about that. I submitted them a while back as bugzilla
tickets but nobody applied them. Can you apply them for me?
(Bug#31230)
That's what I get for speaking up! ;^)
I won't be able to do them during the day today, but if no one else
get
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 00:01:14 -0700, Michael McGrady
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Martin,
>
> What I am saying is very simple, and I am not sure what is the difficulty.
>
> >As I've said, you are absolutely free to handle file uploads however you want.
> >
> >
> The whole point is that this
The package is *not* deprecated. What is deprecated is the old, buggy
implementation. The replacement is not Commons FileUpload, but is a
Struts wrapper around Commons FileUpload. See
CommonsMultipartRequestHandler. That implementation has been the
default implementation in Struts for quite some ti
Michael McGrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way that it would make sense in the future to allow
> developers using Struts to specify their own interface for multipart
> request handlers? This is probably a stupid suggestion but couldn't
> Struts leave the interface at something like
Hi.
Although I'm not in the fileupload discussion, I also strongly suggest to be more
verbose on the @deprecated tag, as it allows much quicker solution of the warnings
during compile.
Hiran
-
Hiran Chaudhuri
SAG Systemhaus GmbH
Elsenheimer Straße 11
808
Martin Cooper wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 00:01:14 -0700, Michael McGrady
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, Martin,
What I am saying is very simple, and I am not sure what is the difficulty.
As I've said, you are absolutely free to handle file uploads however you want.
The whole point
I posted this problem on the Struts list so sorry for the cross post
now, but I'm curious if any of you have some thoughts on what the
problem below could be:
When I deploy any of the sample Struts 1.2.4 apps that use the
validation-rules.xml JBoss complains. However, if I comment out all the
Martin Cooper wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 00:01:14 -0700, Michael McGrady
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, Martin,
What I am saying is very simple, and I am not sure what is the difficulty.
As I've said, you are absolutely free to handle file uploads however you want.
The whole point
Michael McGrady wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 00:01:14 -0700, Michael McGrady
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, Martin,
What I am saying is very simple, and I am not sure what is the
difficulty.
As I've said, you are absolutely free to handle file uploads
however you wan
Date: 2004-10-05T18:27:08
Editor: NiallPemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: FrontPage
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/FrontPage
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
*
Date: 2004-10-05T18:29:39
Editor: NiallPemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsMaintenance
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsMaintenance
no comment
New Page:
The intention of this page is to provide a place to put notes on tasks for maintaining
Date: 2004-10-05T18:29:50
Editor: NiallPemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsMaintenanceGump
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsMaintenanceGump
no comment
New Page:
= Notes on the Struts Gump Metadata =
'''N.B.''' The gump '''metadata''
Date: 2004-10-05T18:32:26
Editor: NiallPemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsMaintenance
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsMaintenance
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -1
> Since you have not responded, Martin, I will assume for the moment that
> you agree with the foregoing.
Michael, now why would you think that Michael? Is this your policy when
participating in a public forum Michael? Did it ever occur to you that some
people, Michael, are just tired of corresp
Date: 2004-10-05T18:41:45
Editor: NiallPemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsMaintenanceValidWhenParser
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsMaintenanceValidWhenParser
no comment
New Page:
The following files are generated by [http://www.antlr.o
Date: 2004-10-05T18:43:08
Editor: NiallPemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsMaintenance
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsMaintenance
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -1
James Mitchell wrote:
Since you have not responded, Martin, I will assume for the moment that
you agree with the foregoing.
Michael, now why would you think that Michael? Is this your policy when
participating in a public forum Michael? Did it ever occur to you that some
people, Michael, are
James Mitchell wrote:
Since you have not responded, Martin, I will assume for the moment that
you agree with the foregoing.
Michael, now why would you think that Michael? Is this your policy when
participating in a public forum Michael? Did it ever occur to you that some
people, Michael, are
I fixed the problem and I think there is a bug in the SAXParser. My file was
correct from the beginning. Its first line was the following:
with nothing before the first tag and I kept
getting 'org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Content is not allowed in prolog'
After several hours of seeking and
40 matches
Mail list logo
