Don,
>> Then, once the release is out, people nitpick through it finding
>> issues to shoot it down (and yes, a beta is as good as a killed
>> release because it doesn't get out to the users in an public,
>> accessible location).
I must be one of the folk guilty of nit-picking :) But honestly,
I've trudged through the pages that were linked to the "home" page.
I'm now wrapping up the remaining xx pages that were not linked in
anywhere. Most of these cover the various Interceptor and Result
Types. A lot of the pages utilize the snippet macro, and so the next
step would be to review the J
On 5/14/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/
I thought this would default to the dashboard, but it doesn't. Insted, try
* http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/dashboard.action
-Ted.
-
On 5/14/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If, in six months with 100% dedicated committers willing to
do whatever it takes and a codebase that is stable and proven, we can't
push out a GA release, we have a serious problem.
First, six months of effort would be a record. Typically, the pr
On 5/13/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Issue STR-2876 is open for the missing Tiles 1.1 DTD registration, and
I'll start a release plan for version 1.3.5. (Would anyone like to
volunteer as release manager?)
The rest of May is booked, but I could make time in the beginning of
June,
On 5/14/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yes, a beta is as good as a killed release because it doesn't get out to
the users in an public, accessible location).
Ummm, we can submit a Beta for general circulation and mirroring.
Right now, today, we're doing that with the Shale *Alpha*.
*
On 5/14/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If it helps, I'd say we could we could even announce the next distribution as
* "Stuts Action 1.3.5 Beta (release candidate)".
(Given the votes, of course.)
I think the only thing that's broken is the notion that a Beta is not
a Release Candid
On 5/13/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For this reason, I believe tiles and scripting should not belong
with the struts distribution. I've tried to view them as part of the
core product (which the examples and taglib align to), but I can't
force myself to believe they are really 1.
Wendy, the only reason I bring this up (and the only reason),
is because I believe the Tiles DTD that has plagued 1.3.4 is
a symptom of the decision.
Listen to this logic: By making branding Tiles a 1.3.x version,
we are directly tying the product to struts. That implies it
is only for Struts, an
On 5/14/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Listen to this logic: By making branding Tiles a 1.3.x version,
we are directly tying the product to struts. That implies it
is only for Struts, and that's not true.
Struts Tiles *is* tied directly to Struts Action -- look at the
dependency
Wendy, +1 on picking apart my argument :)
Thanks for clearing things up for me; I apologize for missing
the obvious fact that this isn't Standalone Tiles. I got lost
in my philosophy! Thanks again :)
--- Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/14/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Don
Do you need a Javaone conference badge to get into the Pavillion?
I wanted to invite another developer to the BOF?
Also is there any going on the Thirsty Bear this year 2006. I remember you all
last year.
By the way I am in San Francisco now. "peter dot pilgrim @gmail.com"
---
Hi Guys
I just here in San Francisco. Is there a beer-drinking birds-of-feather planned
for the Struts / WebWork developer at Java One 2006? I know last year and the
year before that it was all happening at the Thirsty Bear.
-
P
On 5/14/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd rather not re-introduce the term "release candidate" at this
point, especially not in combination with 'Beta'. Under our current
guidelines, a Beta *is* a release.
And, so is an Alpha. And we can distribute any release - Alpha, Beta,
or GA
There was talk about the Geronimo party, afterwards at the W.
Otherwise, Tuesday evening at the Thirsty Bear after the blogger meetup
would work nicely. The "beer-drinking" bof is traditionally organized
by Van, and he's been pretty busy lately.
Don
Peter Pilgrim wrote:
Hi Guys
I just here
Peter Pilgrim wrote:
Hi Don
Do you need a Javaone conference badge to get into the Pavillion?
You do need at least a Pavilion badge, which are $100 good only for one
day IIRC.
Don
I wanted to invite another developer to the BOF?
Also is there any going on the Thirsty Bear this year 200
The snippet macro is updated. You can use URLs in the following format:
org.struts.apache.action2. (links directly to a class in the _core_ module
only)
action2/... (links from the root of the action2 trunk)
We'll need to get all references to the webwork snippets switched over as the
next
We won't be able to use Atlassian's public server - our stuff is just too heavy
duty. Contegix (not Contegrix :P) might be interested to help, but I imagine
they would probably feel more interested if they were in a position that was
more than just an emergency/temporary storage location (eg: of
Unless I'm mistaken, the votes I've always seen come up have three
choices: mark a release alpha, beta or GA. This would seem to be the
cause of the "problem" with the process to me because it in effect
allows the process to be "short circuited", i.e., a newly-rolled release
could be marked GA
It looks like this is now basically done (the JIRA issue is complete). The
final step will be to unsubscribe the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] from all lists
except for the dev@ list. That will keep the forums synced on the OpenSymphony
forums limited to just the discussions. I was trying to figure
Lovely. Thx Pat.
- Original Message
From: Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 15 May, 2006 1:56:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Action2] STATUS - Documentation
The snippet macro is updated. You can use URLs in the following format:
org.struts.apache.actio
> There was talk about the Geronimo party, afterwards
> at the W.
> Otherwise, Tuesday evening at the Thirsty Bear after
> the blogger meetup
> would work nicely. The "beer-drinking" bof is
> traditionally organized
> by Van, and he's been pretty busy lately.
>
The Geronimo party. Who is orga
Hey,
just saw that Dojo released version 0.30. Our Dojo support in SAF/WW
2.2.x is currently based on the "outdated" 0.21 release.
Shouldn't we update the embedded Dojo release and try to get our ajax
tags running again properly?
It sounds like lots of problems with browser support were fi
What is the current state? is there a checklist of functionality and
what is done/needs to be done? I am starting a new project and would
like to go with SAF2 if possible...
The below svn co comes from the wiki pages. There is no project to
checkout. What is the status of the project? the docs
On 5/14/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Each release can be distributed as far and wide as you want, and in fact
should be, to get as many people testing as possible.
Yes. The reason we stopped putting qualifiers like "beta" and "rc" in
the distribution names, was so we could s
There is no SAF2 binary download available yet, but should be soon.
We are currently working on this topic.
Currently SAF2 is available via SVN only under the following address:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/action2/trunk/
To build from source have a look at http://confluence.twdata.or
There still might be some API changes in SAF 2, and if you do go with
SAF 2 now, you should be prepared to make some arbitrary changes
later. Personally, I'd get started with WW 2.2, and then migrate when
the SAF 2 build start to roll.
-Ted.
On 5/14/06, hanasaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What
Is there a checklist of what remains to be done in SAF2?
Any docs to compare WW2.2 vs SAF2?
I never used WW and after reading the docs am not sure if SAF2 is
something new or just a new name for WW as it is incorporated into apache.
Ted Husted wrote:
> There still might be some API changes in SA
Sounds good to me...I'll give it a try today
Don
Rainer Hermanns wrote:
Hey,
just saw that Dojo released version 0.30. Our Dojo support in SAF/WW
2.2.x is currently based on the "outdated" 0.21 release.
Shouldn't we update the embedded Dojo release and try to get our ajax
tags running aga
On 5/14/06, hanasaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a checklist of what remains to be done in SAF2?
We're in the middle of porting the documentation and finalizing some
fine-points of API changes created by the name-change. But, we are not
planning much in the way of new development for SA
On 5/14/06, Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We won't be able to use Atlassian's public server - our stuff is just too heavy
duty.
Is there a particular aspect of "heavy duty" that causes more
problems: Too many pages or too many hits?
If the size of a space matters, it might make
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
I came across this presentation on good API design I thought relevant to
our current Action 2 API discussions:
http://lcsd05.cs.tamu.edu/slides/keynote.pdf
Don
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional command
Van is having a Monday night user session on SAF2 by Peabody, I'll be there.
.V
Peter Pilgrim wrote:
The Geronimo party. Who is organising that one? Virtua
http://raibledesigns.com/page/rd?entry=good_parties_at_javaone
I remember Van from last year. Oh well it looks like the Geronimo Party
On 5/14/06, hanasaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a checklist of what remains to be done in SAF2?
There is now :)
* http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease200
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Thanks for the link. The ThreadLocal discussion toward the end applies
directly to the new attributes package.
Bob
On 5/14/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I came across this presentation on good API design I thought relevant to
our current Action 2 API discussions:
http://lcsd05.cs.ta
On 5/14/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And yes, this means that once a Struts Action 1.3 release is voted GA,
that DTD, along with all the others, the TLDs and the public API, is
set.
Oh, we've managed to make significant changes to the public APIs over
the years. Most often, it's j
On 5/14/06, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey,
just saw that Dojo released version 0.30.
Built and released from the audience at The Ajax Experience on Friday,
literally 5 minutes before the start of Brad Neuberg's presentation on
dojo.storage. ;-)
(We have _got_ to find an exc
38 matches
Mail list logo
