My understanding from the meeting was that we would not pursue
components that simply wrapped other components (i.e. dojo widgets).
Instead these components would fall into an "extra" project, separate
from the core project.
/Ian
tm jee wrote:
Hmm what about the ajax component support?
Could you expand on the benefits? - I've not had time to follow much lately.
/Ian
--
From Down & Around, Inc.
Innovative IT Solutions
Software Architecture * Design * Development
~
web: www.fdar.com
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone:617.
On Jun 17, 2006, at 10:41 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
In the sandbox, Tiles has tiles-config_1_1.dtd and tiles-
config_1_2.dtd.
After the "Tiles 2.0" thread, I'd suggest changing to just tiles-
config_2_0.dtd.
And along the lines of SB-21 cleaning up the TLD, it looks like a few
things can be re
> Instead these components would fall into an "extra" project, separate
> from the core project.
Is it possible to have it remain in core, I am willing to maintain and improve
them.
About using dwr as the officianl ajax tool / util, i am not sure how components
could be build around it. Would
I see your concern.
I don't use doXXX and extends my custom interceptor off Interceptor interface,
so it wouldn't be of any impact to me, but I am not sure about other WebWork
users.
Since this is a SAF2 release, I'd prefer to either remove them totally or keep
them, rather than marking them a
I've done a bit of work with both DWR and Dojo, so...
DWR is really fantastic in terms of being really easy and clean to write
to. It makes remote calls to the server look like nothing more than
function calls to a local Javascript object. Really sweet.
But, that's all it is. While that's grea
We released 3 new project under our BlueOxygen Projects, the Lotion SFA,
Ramen Material Management, Obat Help Desk, and Papaje Job MArketplace.
All of these projects powered by Cimande, an integration project of
WebWork/Struts Action, Spring, Hiberante, and Velocity.
If you are think that JS
On 6/15/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(3) Download and unpack the sample applications[2][3][4][5][6]:
For each sampe app, you should be able to:
...
* Deploy the web application in the "dist" directory on Tomcat 5.5 or
equivalent, with no deployment errors
I haven't looked
> I see your concern.
>
> I don't use doXXX and extends my custom interceptor
> off Interceptor interface, so it wouldn't be of any
> impact to me, but I am not sure about other WebWork
> users.
>
> Since this is a SAF2 release, I'd prefer to either
> remove them totally or keep them, rather than
I guess my point of view, which I thought others shared at JavaOne
(please speak up, because I'm starting to think that I am imagining it
:)), is this:
1. For very basic wrapped widgets the dojo implementation is great.
But, as soon as people start working more in depth, problems arise and
i
I don't use them.
On 6/19/06, Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see your concern.
>
> I don't use doXXX and extends my custom interceptor
> off Interceptor interface, so it wouldn't be of any
> impact to me, but I am not sure about other WebWork
> users.
>
> Since this is a SAF2 rele
See below:
>
> 1. For very basic wrapped widgets the dojo
> implementation is great.
> But, as soon as people start working more in depth,
> problems arise and
> in-depth knowledge of the dojo framework is required.
> I believe Pat's
> xamples of this was debugging issues. This no longer
>
Thanks for all the work Frank!
I am definitely going to take a look next week.
/Ian
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
As per the previous discussions, JIRA ticket is created:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1330
This is an addition to SAF2 that will allow incoming XML or JSON
messages to
No problem... I'm still pretty new to WW/SAF2, and this has been a good
exercise to get in there and learn a bit :)
Frank
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
AIM: fzammetti
Yahoo: fzammetti
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Java Web Parts -
As requested, i've created SHALE-195 for this issue.
Thanks
Jack
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [shale]strange behaviors in rolodex with clay use case
> example
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary VanMatre)
> Date: Sun, June 18, 2006 8:31 pm
> To: "Struts Developers List"
>
>
On Mon, June 19, 2006 12:34 pm, Jason Carreira wrote:
>> 3. Using #2 above we are not forcing user to either
>> use the dojo version
>> in the SAF release, or to muck about updating the
>> dojo version
>> themselves - currently the dojo JS is included in the
>> core JAR file.
>> Not being able to e
On 6/19/06, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My understanding from the meeting was that we would not pursue
components that simply wrapped other components (i.e. dojo widgets).
Instead these components would fall into an "extra" project, separate
from the core project.
Right. But there
+1 for removing them
-
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=34665&messageID=67801#67801
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
Ted Husted wrote:
You might at least want to start those discussions about the
checkstyle settings, so that we can develop a strategy about how they
would be fixed the next time there is a window of opportunity.
Fair enough...
I saw two issues that seem to account for
On 6/19/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, June 19, 2006 12:34 pm, Jason Carreira wrote:
>> 3. Using #2 above we are not forcing user to either
>> use the dojo version
>> in the SAF release, or to muck about updating the
>> dojo version
>> themselves - currently the dojo JS
At 10:11 AM -0700 6/19/06, Martin Cooper wrote:
I've been wondering if Dojo shouldn't perhaps be added to the Maven repo on
ibiblio. At my day job, we use two DHTML toolkits. I added them to our local
repo, and they get incorporated into the app using the Maven dependency
plugin. This works real
> At 10:11 AM -0700 6/19/06, Martin Cooper wrote:
> I've had a ghost of an idea in my head that you could put a Servlet
> in front of Dojo and serve it out of a JAR so that you had a more
> clear idea of what was in the release -- I've never been too
> comfortable with unpacking the distro and putt
On 6/19/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 10:11 AM -0700 6/19/06, Martin Cooper wrote:
>
>I've been wondering if Dojo shouldn't perhaps be added to the Maven repo
on
>ibiblio. At my day job, we use two DHTML toolkits. I added them to our
local
>repo, and they get incorporated into t
On Mon, June 19, 2006 1:11 pm, Martin Cooper wrote:
>> Comparing DWR and Dojo, I come away with this thought: DWR has a model
>> for
>> doing what is essential RPC, Dojo doesn't (it has the capability of
>> course, but not the API in essence).
>
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by this. Have you look
At 10:34 AM -0700 6/19/06, Don Brown wrote:
This is exactly how Struts Action 2 works today - we package Dojo into our
jar, then let SAF2 serve up its static content through a known prefix,
"struts/" I believe. We also provide hooks to let you serve up other
static content from jars.
yep. I'm
On Mon, June 19, 2006 1:02 pm, Laurie Harper wrote:
> Since this is a change to the checkstyle rules, not a change to the
> codebase, I don't think it needs to wait for a release/GA/whatever.
> Might as well just get it done now...
Sounds good. Tell you what... it's a minor change, but I'll creat
I have tried to follow this whole thread (but probably I have missed
some aspects, so sorry if I re-sayin something already said or
bringing an arguement already demolished).
My understand was the same as Ian's (after a long thread I had with Pattrick).
1. The idea would that WebWork/SAF2 core s
On 6/15/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ted Husted wrote:
> You might at least want to start those discussions about the
> checkstyle settings, so that we can develop a strategy about how they
> would be fixed the next time there is a window of opportunity.
Fair enough...
I sa
On Mon, June 19, 2006 2:57 pm, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> My understand was the same as Ian's (after a long thread I had with
> Pattrick).
>
> 1. The idea would that WebWork/SAF2 core should provide the means to
> build almost all we can think of AJAX based on DWR integration.
Just to make sure it
On 6/19/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, June 19, 2006 2:57 pm, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
> My understand was the same as Ian's (after a long thread I had with
> Pattrick).
>
> 1. The idea would that WebWork/SAF2 core should provide the means to
> build almost all we can th
On Mon, June 19, 2006 3:22 pm, Alexandru Popescu wrote:
>> Just to make sure it's really, really clear, because I think it
>> ultimately
>> leads to two different places... If I wanted a treeview widget let's
>> say,
>> it would be built on top of DWR (integrated directly into SAF2 in some
>> fashi
Clean checkout and build works like a charm. I will try to take a
look and see what else needs doing.
Sean
On 6/18/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see I am too late to add my +1. Thanks for the work Craig. I will
try and test this on Monday.
Sean
ps. The continuum server is
On 6/14/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes. There is a wiki page for this as well.
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsContinuum
It's a work in progress, and I'm about to head out, but I'd like to
ask Wendy a few questions wrt pom, parent-pom, snapshot vs. released,
etc, etc.
B
Hi all,
Being new to this, I was wonder what the upcoming process will be in terms of
adding new features. i.e. Is each feature to be considered voted on, etc. Also,
will new XWork features be handled at opensymphony and struts 2.0 features
handled here?
The two big issues not on the items un
On 6/19/06, Gabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Being new to this, I was wonder what the upcoming process will be in terms of
adding
new features. i.e. Is each feature to be considered voted on, etc.
It's mainly done along the lines of the Rough Spots page, or the
current thread about Ajax.
In th
Wonderful timing, I was just about to start a new thread wrt getting
the nightlies back online. And so I'll move my thoughts here.
So, with the mini hackathon out of the way, and our new buddy
MrStruts taking care of the continuous integration for us (ok, he
isn't doing much right now
On 6/19/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Craig, I've already zapped the 'maven' directory, can we:
1. remove the extra directory 'maven2' and just have p.a.o/builds/
struts/shale (requires you to change your scp script)?
Related: I'm using
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/m
On 6/19/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/14/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes. There is a wiki page for this as well.
> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsContinuum
>
> It's a work in progress, and I'm about to head out, but I'd like to
> ask Wendy a few quest
Done. Password set to cryptic default and will be mailed to your
privately. What address would you to receive it on?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ??
--
James Mitchell
On Jun 20, 2006, at 12:54 AM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
Cool ... if you guys want to set me up as a user no the zone
machine as
That brings up another interesting problem. Generated docs. I know
we try to keep the latest and greatest docs online (main site) but
for branched versions (Action 1.2.x), we would need to provide the
docs as well. So it might look like...
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/action1/1
On 6/19/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wonderful timing, I was just about to start a new thread wrt getting
the nightlies back online. And so I'll move my thoughts here.
So, with the mini hackathon out of the way, and our new buddy
MrStruts taking care of the continuous int
On 6/19/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Done. Password set to cryptic default and will be mailed to your
privately. What address would you to receive it on?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ??
Yep. Thanks.
--
James Mitchell
Craig
On Jun 20, 2006, at 12:54 AM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
Ok, with my latest change, we now have the 1.2.x nightlies back online.
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/action1/1.2.x/
The only hickup was the log file, but that's already resolved and I'm
firing off another build in 2 minutes.
--
James Mitchell
On Jun 20, 2006, at 1:05 AM, James
A while ago I did some UML diagrams for Shale with UMLGraph. It
worked, but required a lot of configuration plus an extra step to get
the .png files generated.
I saw Andrea Aime on [EMAIL PROTECTED] the other day, and checked in with
her to find out that she's working on UmlDoc, an alternate doc
I changed the site url in the shale-parent and shale-apps-parent poms
so we can deploy the website without overwriting the existing one.
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/shale/site/
To deploy the site here: mvn site site:deploy
(Staging the site locally wasn't really working, and when
For anyone who cares, there are currently 4 different CheckStyle
configurations in svn, but I believe we are only really using 1 of
them for most of the builds.
1) ./maven/build/struts_checks.xml <- currently up to date
2) ./action/taglib/src/conf/qa/CheckStyle.xml
3) ./sandbox/flow/struts_c
46 matches
Mail list logo
