On 7/10/06, Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is a good question. I've wrestled with this a lot with WebWork. A few
thoughts:
- Does documentation have to be included in the release, or is connectivity
good enough
these days to let us get away with just pointing users to the w
>
> Yes, we do seem to have a JAR bloat issue with Struts
> 2. On disk, the
> S2 applications run *twice* the size of comparable
> S1 applications.
> (Though, that does not mean the memory footprint is
> different!)
>
> Why is that? Are we sucking in any runtime
> dependencies that we don't
> ne
On 7/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: husted
Date: Tue Jul 11 07:25:52 2006
New Revision: 420868
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=420868&view=rev
Log:
SITE-8 : Update nighly build reference; delete obsolete 'downloads.xml' page;
yet another tweak to index and roa
On 7/10/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Once the docs are squared-away, I can review the bundled applications,
tag it all STRUTS_1_3_5, and roll the distribution. We can then review
the distribution and vote on a quality grade. If for any reason, 1.3.5
doesn't make GA, we'll can try ag
For the 1.3.5 version, do we want to remove any references to using
Tiles outside of Struts, except to refer to the separate Tiles 2
subproject?
As mentioned on the user list, there are references to a TilesServlet
and installation notes that seem to be obsolete.
For this version, I'd like to cu
You might as well go ahead and commit those. I can't seem patch my
local checkout without seeing a bunch of partial chunk failures, so
I'm sure I'm just doing it wrong.
Thanks
--
James Mitchell
On Jul 11, 2006, at 1:37 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 7/10/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
First, I want to say that the Struts 1.3.5 assembly is a marvel of
Maven engineering.
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/1.3.x/assembly/
It's all there, simple as pie.
/docs
/lib
/src
/webapps
NOTICE.txt
LICENSE.txt
My only question is: Does size matter?
Zipped, the 1.3.5 snapshot is 40
I can do some more Checkstyle work over the next few days... when do you
(or whoever is going to do it) plan to role the release? I absolutely
doubt I can get them all taken care of by then, whenever then actually is,
but I should be able to cut through another sizable chunk of them.
Wendy, your
I'm not sure what the issue with the patches was (for me), but I
tried applying them on both of the following:
Windows XP/Cygwin
Mac OS X/standard console
I tried it both individually and with Wendy's patch.
Thanks
--
James Mitchell
On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:59 PM, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
Weird. Almost certainly some silly setting when generating them that
I'm not aware of... Wendy can fill us both in on what the magic she
worked was :)
Frank
James Mitchell wrote:
I'm not sure what the issue with the patches was (for me), but I tried
applying them on both of the following:
On 7/11/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can do some more Checkstyle work over the next few days... when do you
(or whoever is going to do it) plan to role the release?
If Wendy checks in those checkstyle patches, we just need to sort out
the Tiles documentation, which would b
Ok, in that case I'll hold off until later... a month or so after
release maybe? I know you said patches after releases are generally
frowned upon, does a month sound like a reasonable waiting period?
Frank
Ted Husted wrote:
On 7/11/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can do
On 7/11/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Zipped, the 1.3.5 snapshot is 40.8mb.
Zipped, the individual components come to
docs.zip - 11.5mb
lib.zip - 2.8mb
src.zip - 5.8mb
webapps - 20.5mb
Do we want to offer these archives separately, in addition to the
combined snapshot?
I'd like
On 7/11/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Weird. Almost certainly some silly setting when generating them that
I'm not aware of... Wendy can fill us both in on what the magic she
worked was :)
None, apparently, if James can't apply my version either. :) FWIW,
I'm applying patc
On 7/11/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For this version, I'd like to cut to the chase and treat Tiles as
bundled component, like the Validator. I don't know if we have the
code in there to use it standalone or not, but even if we do, we
should refer people to Tiles 2 for that sort of
Ah, sorry, for some reason I thought your changes had worked for him.
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 7/11/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Weird. Almost certainly some silly setting when generating them that
I'm not aware of... Wendy can fill us both in on what the magic she
worked was
Do you want to copy over the Tiles docs that we have now, before I
have at them?
They would at least be a starting point/
-Ted.
On 7/11/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/11/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For this version, I'd like to cut to the chase and treat Tiles
On 7/11/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you want to copy over the Tiles docs that we have now, before I
have at them?
I don't think so. We can always copy them by revision number later if
we need them, so go ahead with your changes.
--
Wendy
On Jul 11, 2006, at 5:51 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 7/11/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For this version, I'd like to cut to the chase and treat Tiles as
bundled component, like the Validator. I don't know if we have the
code in there to use it standalone or not, but even if we do,
I don't know what I'm doing wrong, but the menu URIs on the subsites
are not rendering correctly for me.
For some reason, they seem to be stripping
"http://struts.apache.org/"; out of all the URIs, so that a reference
to "http://struts.apache.org/1.x"; becomes "1.x", and a reference to
just "http
On 7/11/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had intended to finish out the 1.x documentation in such a way that
it could be ported to 2.x but I ran out of time. The existing doc is
high-level enough that it still applies to both - except the reference
to TilesServlet, which only applie
Anyone know what's causing this? I grepped for "com.opensymphony.xwork." and
"ConfigurationProvider" but the culprit wasn't immediately clear.
---
T E S T S
---
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
You need to clear your local copy of xwork, most likely.
Don
Bob Lee wrote:
Anyone know what's causing this? I grepped for "com.opensymphony.xwork."
and
"ConfigurationProvider" but the culprit wasn't immediately clear.
---
T E S T S
On 7/11/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know what I'm doing wrong, but the menu URIs on the subsites
are not rendering correctly for me.
For some reason, they seem to be stripping
"http://struts.apache.org/"; out of all the URIs, so that a reference
to "http://struts.apache.or
On 7/11/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If the directory name on the site matches the artifactId in
the pom, it works as designed.
s/designed/desired. I assume it's working as designed, even if I'm
not quite sure what the design is...
--
Wendy
-
On 7/11/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's (somehow) related to the // in
the pom. It took me a few tries to get the links on the Tiles 2 site
to work. If the directory name on the site matches the artifactId in
the pom, it works as designed. If not, you have to add elements
to f
The web site directory already matches the artifact id, IIRC. I
thought your original complaint was about how Maven dealt with the
/1.x prefix.
Don
On 7/11/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/11/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's (somehow) related to the // in
> the p
On 7/11/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do we want to go with the flow and change the directory names then?
If we are using "struts-scripting" on the website, it makes more sense
to me to use "struts-scripting" in the repository.
Changing the directory names in the svn repo isn't go
Oh, you are talking about svn. Ignore me :)
Don
Don Brown wrote:
The web site directory already matches the artifact id, IIRC. I
thought your original complaint was about how Maven dealt with the
/1.x prefix.
Don
On 7/11/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/11/06, Wendy Smoak <[E
I dunno: /repos/asf/struts/struts1/struts-core ... that's a lot of Struts and
too much typing, IMO. The only reason the artifact id's have "struts-" in them
is for the jar names. Otherwise, I'd say the group id having Struts in it would
be fine.
Don
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 7/11/06, Ted Hust
On 7/11/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Zipped, the 1.3.5 snapshot is 40.8mb.
Zipped, the individual components come to
docs.zip - 11.5mb
lib.zip - 2.8mb
src.zip - 5.8mb
webapps - 20.5mb
Do we want to offer these archives separately, in addition to the
combined snapshot?
In some pl
On 7/11/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I dunno: /repos/asf/struts/struts1/struts-core ... that's a lot of Struts and
too much typing, IMO. The only reason the artifact id's have "struts-" in them
is for the jar names. Otherwise, I'd say the group id having Struts in it would
be fine.
On 7/11/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's (somehow) related to the // in
the pom. It took me a few tries to get the links on the Tiles 2 site
to work. If the directory name on the site matches the artifactId in
the pom, it works as designed. If not, you have to add elements
to f
Ted Husted wrote:
I'd really prefer that we use one set of naming conventions. If it's
more typing, then so be it. I've already typed a year's worth of URIs
in this email message :)
My suggestion is that we make it a straight-line correlation
Website
/s/1.x/struts1
/s/2.0/struts2
Repository
/s
With the official names being?
struts-docs-1.3.5.zip - 11.5mb
struts-lib-1.3.5.zip - 2.8mb
struts-src-1.3.5.zip - 5.8mb
struts-webapps-1.3.5.zip - 20.5mb
?
Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/11/06, Ted Husted wrote:
> Zipped, the 1.3.5 snapshot is 40.8mb.
>
> Zipped, the individu
On 7/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: wsmoak
Date: Tue Jul 11 21:35:47 2006
New Revision: 421117
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421117&view=rev
Log:
STR-2900 Fix Checkstyle errors in struts-core.
Submitted by: Frank Zammetti
The large change in ActionRedirect
The ticket is WW-1369 [1] and its goal is to make it possible do deploy
two Struts 2 filter dispatchers with completely different configurations
side-by-side in the same web application. As I dig down into this, it
is becoming quite apparent this would be a huge change, and before I do
anythin
On 7/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: wsmoak
Date: Tue Jul 11 23:07:14 2006
New Revision: 421151
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421151&view=rev
Log:
STR-2900 Fix Checkstyle errors in struts-tiles.
Submitted by: Frank Zammetti
TilesRequestProcessor, InsertTag,
38 matches
Mail list logo
