How to get multiple selected values(from multiple select box) in Action?
I tried using String, String[] and rrayList in FormBean, but I am not getting
values in action using these?
Thanks in advance.
-
Posted via Jive Forums
h
On 8/24/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The other approach, if you're using something like Digester (which is true
at least for S1) to parse the config file, is to define an explicit rule
that calls the right setter if there is an attribute with a specified name.
We do the same
On 8/23/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm hoping to upgrade AppFuse from WW to the latest Struts 2.0.0
> snapshot this week. I'm starting a presentation on "Migrating from
> Struts 1 to Struts 2" next week. Has anyone started such a document?
> I'd be happy to contribute.
Not as s
On 7/27/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ApacheCon US has accepted my offer to present a half-day tutorial on
Migrating to Struts 2.
So, my tutorial is on Monday, Don's presentation is on Wednesday, and
ApacheCon runs through Friday.
Is anyone else coming out for the "Hackathon" days
> On 8/23/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In my five-day class last week, we spent most of the
> time covering
> Struts 2 from the ground-up, and I made comparisons
> to Struts 1 along
> the way. The course uses the MailReader as a running
> example. On day
> five, after we had built
> Ok, this issue breaks down like this in my mind:
> 1. Should our tags (url, form, etc) have attributes
> for the
> amespace, action, and method, or just have one for
> the url?
> 2. Should our default ActionMapper allow the method
> to be specified in the url?
> Issue #1 goes back to the more f
> I guess why I don't like this mentality is that we
> have these kinds of security holes all over the
> place. If you expose getters or setters that are
> unsafe in your action or _any_ of your model objects,
> you can get that problem. The fact is that with
> dynamic reflection that is controlled
On 8/24/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/27/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ApacheCon US has accepted my offer to present a half-day tutorial on
> Migrating to Struts 2.
So, my tutorial is on Monday, Don's presentation is on Wednesday, and
ApacheCon runs through Frida
On 8/24/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/23/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm hoping to upgrade AppFuse from WW to the latest Struts 2.0.0
> > snapshot this week. I'm starting a presentation on "Migrating from
> > Struts 1 to Struts 2" next week. Has anyone started
On 8/24/06, Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I disagree here because the URL mapping is more likely to change than the
namespace / actionName mapping. Consider if you leave the namespace empty
and just give an action name, it will assume the same namespace. Now if you
change the namespa
On 8/23/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ted Husted wrote:
> Use "action-id" then. The point is that moniker "alias" is going to
> cause confusion, since it already means something entirely different
> within the Struts 2 community.
Right now attributes are squarely mapped to propert
On 8/2/06, Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
under [s2] Validation:
One thing I'd add before Jason chimes in is that you can tie validation to the
action name
by naming the file ActionClass-actionName-validation.xml. But you
still also must have
the action class in the filename as we
> > I guess why I don't like this mentality is that we
> > have these kinds of security holes all over the
> > place. If you expose getters or setters that are
> > unsafe in your action or _any_ of your model
> objects,
> > you can get that problem. The fact is that with
> > dynamic reflection that
>
> First off: we're *not* deprecating and removing the !
> notation at this point. That is what this discussion
> is entirely about.
Not YET... that's what the conversation was about as I read it... when, not if.
>
> Why not disable getters and setters by default too
> and require people pull
We use the "!" syntax, and I'd really like something more secure to replace
it (store valid methods in the session, signed URLs, something), but I'm OK
with defaulting the flag to "off."
Bob
On 8/24/06, Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> First off: we're *not* deprecating and removi
> I need everyone to understand this: the goal should
> be for us (the project leaders) to agree on a style
> of development using Struts that we can all feel
> comfortable recommending as the default starting
> point. For example, I think the default starting
> point should be on that encourages l
> > First off: we're *not* deprecating and removing the
> !
> > notation at this point. That is what this
> discussion
> > is entirely about.
>
> Not YET... that's what the conversation was about as
> I read it... when, not if.
It's not a "when" to me - it's an "if" and a "why" type of discussio
On 8/24/06, Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not YET... that's what the conversation was about as I read it... when, not if.
Hmmm, could be if. At this point, no one is sure, because no one has
tried very hard to do the same thing (better) without the ! syntax.
Doing it with mappings a
Why not just call it actionId instead of action-id? Done.
I gather from the names we choose, most of everything is lower case. It
could just be a style objection -- certainly not a content objection.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 8/24/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes. I expect the audience I'm presentation to to be familiar with
Struts 1.x. I'm sure it's good to do an intro to Struts 2.0 as well,
but overall I'd like to have them leave a 1.5 hour presentation with
the knowledge they need to convert a St
I noticed on the Struts 1.3 web site, the reference guide for the tag
libraries do not have any descriptions. Is this a problem with the
current Maven 2 plug-in?
http://struts.apache.org/1.x/struts-taglib/tagreference.html#struts-html.tld
Paul
-
On 8/24/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I noticed on the Struts 1.3 web site, the reference guide for the tag
libraries do not have any descriptions. Is this a problem with the
current Maven 2 plug-in?
http://struts.apache.org/1.x/struts-taglib/tagreference.html#struts-html.tld
A
I got some good advice that my first two emails were without context.
;-) They were. My apologies.
I noticed that the PerformInclude does not perform an include, but a
forward. Is this an oversight? I am looking at Struts 1.3 core, HEAD,
revision 42119:
protected void perform(ActionConte
On 8/24/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not just call it actionId instead of action-id? Done.
I gather from the names we choose, most of everything is lower case. It
could just be a style objection -- certainly not a content objection.
I'm not sure what all you're including
Based on everyone's recommendations, I am going to try "action-id" as
the attribute. I couldn't find it in the source, but isn't there some
Digester config file I can modify? Or not.. Is it done explicitly in the
ActionServlet? It looks like it, but I'd like some verification on this.
Paul
--
Ok, good to go.
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Aug 22, 2006, at 11:45 PM, John Fallows wrote:
On 8/22/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd say it's more a matter of doing what it has always done rather
than doing what others like it have done. What I mean is, adding
this
On 8/24/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, my tutorial is on Monday, Don's presentation is on Wednesday, and
ApacheCon runs through Friday.
Is anyone else coming out for the "Hackathon" days on Monday and Tuesday?
Yes, I'll be there all week.
--
Wendy
---
27 matches
Mail list logo
