Re: svn commit: r505729 - in /struts/struts1/trunk/core/src/main: java/org/apache/struts/action/ActionServlet.java resources/org/apache/struts/resources/struts-config_1_3.dtd resources/org/apache/stru

2007-02-10 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 2/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Author: pbenedict Date: Sat Feb 10 09:56:46 2007 New Revision: 505729 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=505729 Log: STR-3004: Added 1.4 DTD This commit made a change to the Struts 1.3 DTD, removing 'reset' and 'populate'. W

Re: svn commit: r505729 - in /struts/struts1/trunk/core/src/main: java/org/apache/struts/action/ActionServlet.java resources/org/apache/struts/resources/struts-config_1_3.dtd resources/org/apache/stru

2007-02-10 Thread Paul Benedict
Wendy, the 1.3 change was "reverting" to the original 1.3 version. The 1.4 additions were wrongly made to 1.3, and so I rolled it back. "reset" is still there, but "populate" is now exclusively in 1.4. When you say copy, do you mean an SVN copy? I haven't used that command before, but is that

Re: svn commit: r505729 - in /struts/struts1/trunk/core/src/main: java/org/apache/struts/action/ActionServlet.java resources/org/apache/struts/resources/struts-config_1_3.dtd resources/org/apache/stru

2007-02-10 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 2/10/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Wendy, the 1.3 change was "reverting" to the original 1.3 version. The 1.4 additions were wrongly made to 1.3, and so I rolled it back. "reset" is still there, but "populate" is now exclusively in 1.4. OK, thanks. When you say copy, do you

Re: archetype

2007-02-10 Thread Ian Roughley
Wendy Smoak wrote: Is there a reason that Spring 1.2.8 is declared in the pom generated from the archetype, instead of letting the struts2-spring-plugin determine the version? I was wondering about that myself. /Ian - To uns

Re: archetype

2007-02-10 Thread Don Brown
I fixed it yesterday. Don Ian Roughley wrote: Wendy Smoak wrote: Is there a reason that Spring 1.2.8 is declared in the pom generated from the archetype, instead of letting the struts2-spring-plugin determine the version? I was wondering about that myself. /Ian ---

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.5 Quality

2007-02-10 Thread Tom Schneider
Umm, it looks like the spring plugin jar isn't included. Someone on #struts mentioned this and I confirmed it by downloading struts-2.0.5-all.zip from the website and it's not in the lib directory. (All the other plugins are there) Am I crazy or is it really missing? Tom Ted Husted wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.5 Quality

2007-02-10 Thread Dave Newton
--- Tom Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am I crazy or is it really missing? It wasn't in mine; I copied it from showcase again. Dave Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com.

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.5 Quality

2007-02-10 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 2/10/07, Tom Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Umm, it looks like the spring plugin jar isn't included. Someone on #struts mentioned this and I confirmed it by downloading struts-2.0.5-all.zip from the website and it's not in the lib directory. (All the other plugins are there) Am I craz

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.5 Quality

2007-02-10 Thread psaumets
Haha! I couldve confirmed this a coupple days ago when I updated. I just assumed it was a missed jar. Ejnded up just grabbing it from the showcase example. Anyways it def should be included in thr full lib. Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network -Original Message