+1 for GA release
Am Do, 7.06.2007, 19:07, schrieb Rainer Hermanns:
> Struts Annotations 1.0.2 has been tagged and is available for testing
> in the following Maven repository:
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations-1.0.2/m2-
> staging-repository/
>
> To test this build, t
[+1] General Availability (GA)
Looks good to me, and is desperately needed :)
- Rene
Am Mi, 6.06.2007, 19:49, schrieb Rainer Hermanns:
> The Struts 2.0.8 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
>
> * http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Release+Notes+2.0.8
>
> Distribution:
>
>
+0 for GA. I have to admit I didn't realize that annotations were a
different project, but have been using them in 2.0.8 without issue.
/Ian
Rainer Hermanns wrote:
Struts Annotations 1.0.2 has been tagged and is available for testing
in the following Maven repository:
http://people.apache.o
Here is my +1 for GA.
-Rainer
> Struts Annotations 1.0.2 has been tagged and is available for testing
> in the following Maven repository:
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations-1.0.2/m2-
> staging-repository/
>
> To test this build, temporarily add a repository to pom.xm
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] General Availability (GA)
I am using this build in 2 inhouse projects without problems.
So I think it's time for going GA as well.
cheers,
Rainer
--
Rainer Hermanns
aixcept
Neupforte 16
52062 Aachen - Germany
w: http://a
Here are the results of the vote for going GA with the Struts
Annotations release 1.0.2
Binding:
+1 Don Brown (binding)
+1 Rene Gielen (binding)
+1 Rainer Hermanns (binding)
+0 Ian Roughley (binding)
Non Binding:
+1 Musachy Barroso
+1 Antonio Petrelli
I'll post an announcement as soon as the
Here are the results of the vote:
+1 GA Ian Roughley (binding), Don Brown (binding), James Mitchell
(binding), Rene Gielen (binding), Rainer Hermanns (binding)
+1 GA Pedro Herrera (non binding), Matt Raible (non binding), Antonio
Petrelli (non binding)
Thanks for your votes, I'll post the a
This is a really minor thing, but it gets me all the time, the set tag uses
the "name" attribute for the variable name, while the url, and bean tags use
"id", anybody against deprecating the "name" attribute in set and using "id"
instead?
regards
musachy
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry th
I have finally been able to extract the portlet code into a plugin,
but it required some "shortcuts" due to couplings between the
Components (URL, Form and it's super classes) and generating the URLs.
But at least all tests pass, and there are no more dependencies to the
portlet API in the core. I
On 6/6/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/3/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My hands are full with two jobs at the moment. I can roll the 1.3.9
> release because Maven is easy, but I'd like someone to help out with
> these pre-tasks, if anyone is available:
>
> * Che
>From a S2 user perspective the consistency would be appreciated (understanding
>I'd likely have to do a search and replace in my JSPs sooner or later).
- Original Message
From: Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 12:21:03 PM
Subje
Thanks for the feedback. I logged:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1981
if nobody is against it I will deprecate "name" and start using id instead.
musachy
On 6/11/07, Jon Wilmoth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From a S2 user perspective the consistency would be appreciated
(understan
+1
I still have to look up S1 tag syntax; I'd hate to
have to play that game w/ S2 :)
--- Jon Wilmoth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From a S2 user perspective the consistency would be
> appreciated (understanding I'd likely have to do a
> search and replace in my JSPs sooner or later).
>
>
> --
On 5/3/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Test the webapps
Blank: GOOD.
Cookbook: GOOD.
EL-Examples:
html-el:multibox. When first started, none of the checkboxes were
selected. Also, the '50' on the right hand side is not selectable due
to the 'disabled="${!empty pageScope}"'. Bit
On 6/11/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/3/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Test the webapps
EL-Examples:
Digging more into the major issues:
html-el:multibox. When first started, none of the checkboxes were selected.
Looks to me like the text is plain wr
The main website has been updated.
I am +1 with the redirect -- a permanent one too.
Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nils,
This is a great start. I had wanted to do this myself, but I never
found the time. I only took a brief look at the patch, but a few things
jumped out at me:
1. I'm not sure the UrlRendererFactory is needed. I believe the whole
purpose of guice is to not have anymore factories anymore
Thanks for the feedback!
On 6/12/07, Tom Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. I'm not sure the UrlRendererFactory is needed. I believe the whole
purpose of guice is to not have anymore factories anymore, so guice
should just inject the necessary UrlRenderer. (especially if they are
statele
18 matches
Mail list logo
