On 2/1/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All release *must* include the license.txt ... and ... all source
files *should* include the header. So, assuming there's a difference
between "must" and "should", I would say that we only need to correct
it in future releases.
* http://apache.org
+1.
On 2/8/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think just go ahead and create the branch. Tags/Branches in svn are
cheap and if anyone doesn't like it can always be re-done/reversed.
Niall
On 2/7/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to do this for the 1.x line a
The list of issues for 1.3.7 look good. I can't find your PGP key, so
I'm unable to check the .asc file.
The src in the -all zip happily packages into jars.
Installing the apps into a Tomcat 5.5, I get the following error for
struts-faces-example2-1.3.7:
SEVERE: Parse Error at line 146 column
On 2/28/07, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
> I believe once a release is tagged, it cannot be undone.
Is this a consequence of the release process? Just curious because I
don't think it's a limitation of SVN.
Frank
Consequence. You don't want to have tw
On 3/1/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[X ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
I cast my vote to fix ActionRedirect in 1.3.8:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-3009
Do any other Struts committers object? The complaint is that
ActionRed
+1 for GA.
Based on visual inspection of svn diff, the unpacked source building
happily and the md5's being right (and my testing for 1.3.7). I
couldn't check the pgp key as I still can't find your pgp key.
Hen
On 3/6/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for GA
Anyone know what happened here?
Afaik an anonymous user should not be able to change the state of an
issue AND it shouldn't be possible to go from Closed->Resolved without
going via Reopened.
Hen
On 3/30/07, Anonymous (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/struts/
On 4/3/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using nabble seems to be the path of least resistance.
Hey, if someone wants to take the lead on promoting the use of Nabble
forums within the Struts community, that too would be a good thing.
Nabble does seems like a good option, which is why
Does anyone know why this issue was touched?
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-128
Second time I've noticed this happening. I'm guessing there's a
workflow issue in the Struts JIRA, however it would also be good to
know if someone did this on purpose or not.
Hen
On 4/11/07, Anonymous (
In case anyone wonders, I've changed the JIRA frontpage - the idea
being to use less space and yet still retain the old functions.
Opinions are gratefully received.
It's as a test bed for the bigger task of reducing the enormity that
is the main ASF JIRA front page :)
If you use a custom dashboa
I thought we were doing 1.3.9, then merging 1.3.9 onto the 1.4 trunk?
Hen
On 4/16/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We seem to be getting in a habit of making changes to the 1.3 Branch
and leaving them out of the trunk. Personally I think this is a bad
idea for two reasons:
1) the
D]> wrote:
Would it be easy to add a link to 'Open And Assigned' to the panel on the
right? I know it is in the filters dropdown, but that additional
0.1second in a zillion years would add up to something :)
musachy
On 4/16/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&g
On 4/17/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/4/17, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Try clicking on the red part of the Assigned percentage bar on the
> right hand side.
The green and red part are inverted: clicking on the green part takes
to the open iss
On 4/17/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/4/17, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> We seem to be getting in a habit of making changes to the 1.3 Branch
> and leaving them out of the trunk. Personally I think this is a bad
> idea...
I agree, every changes, especially bug fi
On 4/17/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/17/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/4/17, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Try clicking on the red part of the Assigned percentage bar on the
> > right hand side.
>
&
I don't know if Struts has this problem - it's one that comes up in
discussions at Commons. How to make it easier to notice when people
have been doing lots of work and should be considered as a committer.
One of the problems I find with JIRA is that you can't search for
issues with attachments o
On 5/3/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My hands are full with two jobs at the moment. I can roll the 1.3.9
release because Maven is easy, but I'd like someone to help out with
these pre-tasks, if anyone is available:
* Checkin release notes for 1.3.9
* Correct any site errors
(http:
On 6/6/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/3/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My hands are full with two jobs at the moment. I can roll the 1.3.9
> release because Maven is easy, but I'd like someone to help out with
> these pre-tas
On 5/3/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Test the webapps
Blank: GOOD.
Cookbook: GOOD.
EL-Examples:
html-el:multibox. When first started, none of the checkboxes were
selected. Also, the '50' on the right hand side is not selectable due
to the 'disabled="${!empty pageScope}"'. Bit
On 6/11/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/3/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Test the webapps
EL-Examples:
Digging more into the major issues:
html-el:multibox. When first started, none of the checkboxes were selected.
Looks to me like th
On 7/7/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Struts 1.3.9 test build is now available.
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
+1 GA (non-binding).
GPG is good, MD5 is good, the src zip builds happily and the svn diff
between 1.3.8 and 1
On 8/2/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So to sum up the post-mortem,
>
> Security Releases
>
> * When a serious security issue arises, we should try to create a
> #.#.#.1 branch on the last GA release, and apply to that branch only
> the security patch.
+1. Surgical.
> * If the pa
As an FYI, I've added Struts1 to Continuum:
http://vmbuild1.apache.org/continuum/projectGroupSummary.action?projectGroupId=33
Anyone know where I should send the notifications? [EMAIL PROTECTED], or is
there a different address?
I'm pondering whether to add Struts 1.3.
Hen
; under HEAD is ready for a release.
>
> On 8/20/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/20/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > As an FYI, I've added Struts1 to Continuum:
> > >
> > >
> > http://vmbuild1.
On 4/23/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/23/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Agreed. Would it be possible to do this by JavaOne? Moving Tiles isn't
> > a huge deal, but it would make the new directions of Struts easier to
> > explain to users.
>
>
> Hmm, JavaOne
So people know, I just did:
svn move -m "Moving Shale to TLP"
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/shale https://svn
.apache.org/repos/asf/shale
Committed revision 419348.
You'll need to use svn switch to change your svn checkout to the new location.
( svn switch https://svn.apache.org/re
I hope no one minds; I added the Bugzilla search field to the default
dashboard on the Struts JIRA.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just wanted to comment that I've submitted a unit test for the DOS
attack bug (1.2.x branch) to the unclosed issue, hope it's of use. My
day job involves supporting 1.2.x and being able to volunteer time on
serious legacy issues, so hopefully I'll be pestering you all a bit
more as time goes by :)
The recent CANCEL bugfix saw a change to the struts-config.xml: a
cancellable property was added. When this is used as , you get errors (though they're really
warnings) from the DTD verification in Digester:
***
Feb 28, 2006 4:27:59 PM org.apache.commons.digester.Digester error
SEVERE: Par
the 1.2 dtd - so using
> for this attribute is the way to go.
>
> Niall
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 12:57 AM
>
>
> The recent CANCEL bugfix saw a change to the struts-config.xm
When I run the Cactus tests through Maven against Tomcat 4.1.31, I get
three failed tests in the MultipartBoundaryInputStreamTest. I'm on the
1.2.X branch.
I presume that people mostly do it with Ant, so will dig into getting
that setup, but thought I'd report the problem.
Hen
Errors follow:
Damn - didn't notice this this morning and could have spent a good
chunk of the day looking at the release. Still, there's always
tomorrow.
First thoughts:
The site says:
"After Version 1.2.6 was tagged the 1.2 Branch was created" and then
has a table of bugfixes. I had to look at the 1.2.8 si
On 3/9/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure that the maven build has ever been sorted out to work properly
> in the 1.2.x branch and for 1.2.x and before ant is the official build
> process. Its only since 1.3.x that we adopted maven and got it to work
> properly. I ran the
failed ant build from the source.
Hen
On 3/9/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Damn - didn't notice this this morning and could have spent a good
> chunk of the day looking at the release. Still, there's always
> tomorrow.
>
> First thoughts:
>
> The
On 3/12/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/12/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > md5's and pgp's all pan out. Not sure if it's necessary to sign the
> > md5 files by the way.
>
> Not necessary at this stage while
35 matches
Mail list logo
