Re: What to do with subversion.tigris.org website (technically speaking)

2009-11-17 Thread Jack Repenning
On Nov 17, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: Do the downloads folders need to be in the same tree as the web site itself? Could they just be put somewhere in parallel? Is that question about Tigris, or Apache. If Tigris: yes, either the downloads have to be in the same tree, at least

Re: What to do with subversion.tigris.org website (technically speaking)

2009-11-17 Thread Jack Repenning
On Nov 17, 2009, at 12:31 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: First, sparse checkouts have been around a while and are easy to use. Yes, and yes ... but they're also and still even easier to forget. -==- Jack Repenning Chief Technology Officer CollabNet, Inc. 8000 Marina Boulevard, Suite 600

Re: What to do with subversion.tigris.org website (technically speaking)

2009-11-17 Thread Mark Phippard
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote: C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 at 15:10 -0500: Currently, the Tigris.org machine has an instance set (custom code) which causes that site to be published from the /trunk/www directory of our

Re: What to do with subversion.tigris.org website (technically speaking)

2009-11-17 Thread Branko Čibej
Mark Phippard wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote: C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 at 15:10 -0500: Currently, the Tigris.org machine has an instance set (custom code) which causes that site to be published from the

Re: What to do with subversion.tigris.org website (technically speaking)

2009-11-17 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Jack Repenning wrote: On Nov 17, 2009, at 12:10 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: * Ask CollabNet Ops to convert subversion.tigris.org from a CVS-backed project to a Subversion-backed one, giving us a clean Subversion repository on the box to play with. A teeny note: if you merely

Re: What to do with subversion.tigris.org website (technically speaking)

2009-11-17 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Jack Repenning wrote: On Nov 17, 2009, at 12:10 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: * 'svn export' our ASF 'www' directory, and 'svn import' that into the new subversion.t.o repository's /trunk/www directory, effective forking the history of those files, but for what I think are

list changes

2009-11-17 Thread Edmund
Hi, When someone is subscribed to this list, and makes a post, does that person also receives what he/she posted or does it just go out to everyone else but the poster? I'm subscribed to d...@s.a.o and I've posted three times (including this one); but, I have yet to receive the previous two

Re: applying hunks in svn patch

2009-11-17 Thread Alan Barrett
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Stefan Sperling wrote: 5) Hunks are only applied if they do not overlap with any other hunk. Other patch implementations are able to deal with overlapping hunks. For example, consider this pair of hunks on the left, and a corresponding single hunk on the right: @@

Re: applying hunks in svn patch

2009-11-17 Thread Alan Barrett
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Stefan Sperling wrote: Julian asked for a formal description of how 'svn patch' applies hunks. By the way, patch(1) is described in http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/patch.html. The description does not mention unidiff format, but appears to match

Re: applying hunks in svn patch

2009-11-17 Thread Alan Barrett
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Julian Foad wrote: Stefan Sperling wrote: 3) Hunks matching at or near their original offset in the target file are always preferred over hunks matching at the same location but with a greater offset relative to their original offset. Would I be right