Re: Bdb strings anomaly

2010-01-13 Thread Philip Martin
Vadim Chekan kot.bege...@gmail.com writes: Other optimizations can be implemented, but I can not figure it out, where db transaction scope is set? I have impression that there is none which means that each bdb call is a transaction. If so, write operations are very slow, because transaction

Re: [PATCH] Make svn clients indicate their operation name to backend(right now only to DAV) Version 2

2010-01-13 Thread Kamesh Jayachandran
On 01/13/2010 12:08 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: Kamesh Jayachandran wrote: Hi All, Last week I posted the patch to implement 'svn client' to identify the svn operation they are about to do with a given ra_session. Following thread has the detailed discussion.

Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-13 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
Joe, Would it be possible for you to describe the differences between the versions in the two deps tarballs? I think part of the problem was that when I lost my box a few weeks ago, I also lost the magic combination of deps versions, so just used the most recent versions from the rolling

Re: [PATCH] Augment the awful 200 OK error message when can't connect to repository

2010-01-13 Thread Julian Foad
On Fri, 2010-01-08, I (Julian Foad) wrote: What happens if I accidentally specify a URL that's not a repository? (Recent trunk build, Neon.) $ svn checkout https://svn.apache.org/repos/ svn: OPTIONS of 'https://svn.apache.org/repos': 200 OK (https://svn.apache.org) [...] The attached

Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-13 Thread Mark Phippard
I think the problem is with Neon. We get this error: Linking... Creating library ..\..\..\Release\subversion\libsvn_ra\libsvn_ra-1.lib and object ..\..\..\Release\subversion\libsvn_ra\libsvn_ra-1.exp libneon.lib(ne_socket.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _inet_aton referenced

Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-13 Thread Philip Martin
Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu writes: After pulling 1.6.7 due to a segfault regression, we've rerolled the branch as Subversion 1.6.8. The magic revision is r898464, and you can find the tarballs here: What's the status of serf? I'm seeing lots of failures (46 so far and it

Re: Probable bug with svn copy

2010-01-13 Thread Julian Foad
Hi Alan. Thanks for this report, and sorry for the long time to respond. I finally got around to converting your recipe into an executable script (on Linux) which is attached, and with this it is easy to reproduce the problem. On Thu, 2009-12-17, Alan Spencer wrote: I've been asked to analyse

Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-13 Thread Mark Phippard
SUMMARY: +1 to release NOTE: I tested with the original 1.6.8 zip but signed and verified the current one. PLATFORM: Windows Vista SP2 VS 2008 SP1 Java 1.6 COMPONENTS: Apache2.2.11 APR 1.3.5 APR-UTIL1.3.7 OpenSSL 0.9.8k Neon 0.28.3 Serf

Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-13 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Jan 13, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Philip Martin wrote: Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu writes: After pulling 1.6.7 due to a segfault regression, we've rerolled the branch as Subversion 1.6.8. The magic revision is r898464, and you can find the tarballs here: What's the status

Re: [PATCH] Make svn clients indicate their operation name to backend(right now only to DAV) Version 2

2010-01-13 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Kamesh Jayachandran] This patch is *not* an RA layer hack rather a transparent generic feature so I see nothing wrong in propagating it to higher layers. Well, I agree with Mike, it is neither transparent nor generic. I know you dressed it up to look generic, but we all know that it is

Re: svn commit: r898937 - /subversion/site/site-map.txt

2010-01-13 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Jan 13, 2010, at 2:55 PM, cmpil...@apache.org wrote: Author: cmpilato Date: Wed Jan 13 20:55:20 2010 New Revision: 898937 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=898937view=rev Log: My first pass at categorizing the future homes of various Subversion web documents. For the most part,

Re: svn commit: r898937 - /subversion/site/site-map.txt

2010-01-13 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Hyrum K. Wright wrote: In general, I agree with this idea. It's kinda painful to have to go search notes/, and then the website when looking for various docs. But Staring at plain text files can be painful (especially something as long as HACKING). Links within and between documents

Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-13 Thread Philip Martin
Lieven Govaerts svn...@mobsol.be writes: You mean ra_serf, not serf. I've triggered a build on the Mac buildbot with ra_serf to see if it has the same problem, cause it's the first time I see these errors. On what platform are you building? 64-bit Linux (Debian/Lenny). I can reproduce as

Re: svn commit: r898937 - /subversion/site/site-map.txt

2010-01-13 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Jan 13, 2010, at 3:16 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: Hyrum K. Wright wrote: In general, I agree with this idea. It's kinda painful to have to go search notes/, and then the website when looking for various docs. But Staring at plain text files can be painful (especially something as

Re: Issue 3501: Repositories mounted on NFS don't work

2010-01-13 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Bert Huijben] I think it is easier to use svn_io_get_dirents2() then this block replicating its implementation. Indeed it is easier. It took me several days to get around to testing and committing - r898963. Peter

[BUG] file external copied as file when creating a branch (subversion 1.6.6)

2010-01-13 Thread Alexander Kitaev
Hello, One more addition to my previous message: in SVNKit we've fixed this problem by making commit and wc-to-repos copy operation not to commit file external even when it is modified, unless it is explicitly specified as a file to commit or as a copy source. -- Alexander Kitaev, TMate

Re: svn commit: r898937 - /subversion/site/site-map.txt

2010-01-13 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Hyrum K. Wright wrote: I propose that docs like the merge-tracking design stuffs and hacking and other developer-focused materials continue to live under /trunk, be maintained alongside the code those things are aimed at, etc. But of course, on our public website's Developer Resources page

Re: [NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

2010-01-13 Thread Joe Swatosh
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote: On Jan 13, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: -Original Message- From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markp...@gmail.com] Sent: woensdag 13 januari 2010 15:53 To: Hyrum K. Wright Cc: Joe Swatosh;