Re: svn commit: r1028092 - /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/libsvn_ra_svn/marshal.c

2010-10-28 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Hyrum, On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote: On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 3:40 PM,  stef...@apache.org wrote: Author: stefan2 Date: Wed Oct 27 20:40:53 2010 New Revision: 1028092 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028092view=rev Log:

Re: svn commit: r1028092 - /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/libsvn_ra_svn/marshal.c

2010-10-28 Thread Daniel Shahaf
+1 to merge to trunk. Hyrum K. Wright wrote on Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 16:34:46 -0500: On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 3:40 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote: Author: stefan2 Date: Wed Oct 27 20:40:53 2010 New Revision: 1028092 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028092view=rev Log:

SVN_PROP_MAX_SIZE (was: Re: svn commit: r1028092 - /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/libsvn_ra_svn/marshal.c)

2010-10-28 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 09:30:49AM +0200, Erik Huelsmann wrote: @@ -593,7 +598,14 @@ static svn_error_t *read_string(svn_ra_s                                 svn_ra_svn_item_t *item, apr_uint64_t len)  {   svn_stringbuf_t *stringbuf; -  if (len 0x10) + +  /* We should not use

Re: svn commit: r1028094 - /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/libsvn_subr/svn_string.c

2010-10-28 Thread Daniel Shahaf
stef...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 20:47:06 -: Author: stefan2 Date: Wed Oct 27 20:47:06 2010 New Revision: 1028094 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028094view=rev Log: If we allocate stringbufs, their actual capacity allocated by APR is often larger than

Re: svn commit: r1024394 - /subversion/site/publish/packages.html

2010-10-28 Thread Daniel Shahaf
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:11:20 -0400: On 10/27/2010 09:41 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: 2. Let's think about users: they have different needs for Subversion: just a client, client and server etc. There are different packages to get Subversion to be installed and running.

Re: svn commit: r1028125 - /subversion/trunk/build/ac-macros/java.m4

2010-10-28 Thread Mark Phippard
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Jeremy Whitlock jcscoob...@gmail.com wrote: This approach will basically use the Xcode SDK that matches your OS X version by default.  To me, this seems like a suitable default.  If the default doesn't work for you, there is still the --with-jdk option you

Re: svn commit: r1028104 - /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/tests/libsvn_subr/string -test.c

2010-10-28 Thread Daniel Shahaf
+1 stef...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 21:23:35 -: Author: stefan2 Date: Wed Oct 27 21:23:34 2010 New Revision: 1028104 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028104view=rev Log: Adapt string unit test to recent behavioral changes. *

Re: SVN_PROP_MAX_SIZE (was: Re: svn commit: r1028092 - /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/libsvn_ra_svn/marshal.c)

2010-10-28 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 02:35:49PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 14:22 +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: Can we define a constant like SVN_PROP_MAX_SIZE that says how large a property can be? This would be useful in the patch code, for instance. Right now, a patch with a large

Re: svn commit: r1028104 - /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/tests/libsvn_subr/string -test.c

2010-10-28 Thread Julian Foad
Daniel Shahaf wrote: +1 stef...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 21:23:35 -: URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028104view=rev Log: Adapt string unit test to recent behavioral changes. * subversion/tests/libsvn_subr/string-test.c (test10): relax tests on string

Re: svn commit: r1028104 - /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/tests/libsvn_subr/string -test.c

2010-10-28 Thread Julian Foad
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 15:52 +0100, Julian Foad wrote: Daniel Shahaf wrote: +1 stef...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 21:23:35 -: URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028104view=rev Log: Adapt string unit test to recent behavioral changes. *

[RFC] Eliminate scan_base_repos() - require repos-id and repos-relpath in all BASE nodes

2010-10-28 Thread Julian Foad
Bert and Erik and Philip and I discussed on IRC today the merits, or lack of merits, of allowing repos-id/repos-relpath to be elided in the NODES table BASE layer (op_depth = 0). * The data is not currently elided. * Some queries for locks currently assume the data is not elided. * Elision

RE: svn commit: r1028316 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_wc/wc-queries.sql libsvn_wc/wc_db.c tests/cmdline/copy_tests.py

2010-10-28 Thread Bert Huijben
-Original Message- From: phi...@apache.org [mailto:phi...@apache.org] Sent: donderdag 28 oktober 2010 16:27 To: comm...@subversion.apache.org Subject: svn commit: r1028316 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_wc/wc-queries.sql libsvn_wc/wc_db.c tests/cmdline/copy_tests.py

Re: Cleanup? Surely not.

2010-10-28 Thread Julian Foad
On Fri, 2010-10-22, Philip Martin wrote: C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net writes: I use sparse checkouts and a from-the-project-root checkout of Subversion. A few moments ago, in one shell window, I did this (to fix some WC bustedness due to recent but in property handling):

Re: wc-ng code organisation

2010-10-28 Thread Julian Foad
On Mon, 2010-10-25, Philip Martin wrote: I've been looking at a delete bug: delete can remove a directory NODES row and leave rows for children, thus creating an invalid metadata state. The code is structured as svn_wc_delete4(path): various checks on path for each

Re: [RFC] Eliminate scan_base_repos() - require repos-id and repos-relpath in all BASE nodes

2010-10-28 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com wrote: Bert and Erik and Philip and I discussed on IRC today the merits, or lack of merits, of allowing repos-id/repos-relpath to be elided in the NODES table BASE layer (op_depth = 0). * The data is not currently elided.

Re: [RFC] Eliminate scan_base_repos() - require repos-id and repos-relpath in all BASE nodes

2010-10-28 Thread Mark Phippard
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote: On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com wrote: Bert and Erik and Philip and I discussed on IRC today the merits, or lack of merits, of allowing repos-id/repos-relpath to be

Re: [RFC] Eliminate scan_base_repos() - require repos-id and repos-relpath in all BASE nodes

2010-10-28 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote: On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com wrote: Bert and Erik and Philip and I discussed on IRC today

Re: svn commit: r1028381 - /subversion/site/publish/roadmap.html

2010-10-28 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:48 AM, cmpil...@apache.org wrote: Author: cmpilato Date: Thu Oct 28 16:48:06 2010 New Revision: 1028381 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028381view=rev Log: Add 'Remove obliterate code' to our 1.7 to-do list, per list discussion. Are we talking about 'svn

Re: svn commit: r1028381 - /subversion/site/publish/roadmap.html

2010-10-28 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 10/28/2010 12:50 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:48 AM, cmpil...@apache.org wrote: Author: cmpilato Date: Thu Oct 28 16:48:06 2010 New Revision: 1028381 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028381view=rev Log: Add 'Remove obliterate code' to our 1.7 to-do list,

Re: [RFC] Eliminate scan_base_repos() - require repos-id and repos-relpath in all BASE nodes

2010-10-28 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:36, Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote: On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote: On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Julian Foad

Re: svn commit: r1028381 - /subversion/site/publish/roadmap.html

2010-10-28 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 13:04, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote: On 10/28/2010 12:50 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:48 AM,  cmpil...@apache.org wrote: Author: cmpilato Date: Thu Oct 28 16:48:06 2010 New Revision: 1028381 URL:

Re: svn commit: r1028381 - /subversion/site/publish/roadmap.html

2010-10-28 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 10/28/2010 01:58 PM, Greg Stein wrote: On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 13:04, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote: On 10/28/2010 12:50 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:48 AM, cmpil...@apache.org wrote: Author: cmpilato Date: Thu Oct 28 16:48:06 2010 New Revision:

Re: svn commit: r1028472 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/svn_client.h libsvn_client/deprecated.c libsvn_client/externals.c libsvn_client/relocate.c svn/main.c svn/relocate-cmd.c svn/switch-

2010-10-28 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 10/28/2010 04:54 PM, cmpil...@apache.org wrote: Author: cmpilato Date: Thu Oct 28 20:54:14 2010 New Revision: 1028472 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028472view=rev Log: Fix issue #3597 -- relocate should update externals from the same repository, too. Heads up! This broke the

Re: svn commit: r1028472 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/svn_client.h libsvn_client/deprecated.c libsvn_client/externals.c libsvn_client/relocate.c svn/main.c svn/relocate-cmd.c svn/switch-

2010-10-28 Thread Philip Martin
C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net writes: On 10/28/2010 04:54 PM, cmpil...@apache.org wrote: Author: cmpilato Date: Thu Oct 28 20:54:14 2010 New Revision: 1028472 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028472view=rev Log: Fix issue #3597 -- relocate should update externals from the

Re: svn commit: r1028568 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl: native/ src/org/apache/subversion/javahl/ src/org/tigris/subversion/javahl/

2010-10-28 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 10/28/2010 09:01 PM, hwri...@apache.org wrote: Author: hwright Date: Fri Oct 29 01:01:05 2010 New Revision: 1028568 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1028568view=rev Log: Followup to r1028472 to fix the JavaHL bindings in the face of an API change. Thanks for cleaning up my mess,

Re: svn commit: r1028472 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/svn_client.h libsvn_client/deprecated.c libsvn_client/externals.c libsvn_client/relocate.c svn/main.c svn/relocate-cmd.c svn/switch-

2010-10-28 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 10/28/2010 09:02 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: I don't know whether we should pass TRUE or FALSE: [...] When in doubt: ask the user! I've pushed this parameter up to the JavaHL API level in r1028568. But I