[PATCH] New XFail test for issue 3781

2011-02-07 Thread Prabhu Gnana Sundar
Hi Kamesh, I have created a new thread in order to prevent the confusion about the test case. I have tweaked the test case as you mentioned in the previous thread. Here is the link for the same... http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201102.mbox/%3c0213965108dead48960ce8345

Re: [PATCH] svn command - cat - Multiple targets

2011-02-07 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Noorul Islam K M writes: > Noorul Islam K M writes: > >> Noorul Islam K M writes: >> >>> This patch is a followup of the following thread. All tests pass with >>> this patch. >>> >>> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2011-01/0210.shtml >>> >>> Log >>> >>> [[[ >>> >>> Make svn 'cat' command to retu

[l10n] Translation status report for trunk r1068265

2011-02-07 Thread Subversion Translation Status
Translation status report for trunk@r1068265 lang trans untrans fuzzy obs -- de2056 125 244 200 es1991 190 275 341 fr2178 3 5 2 it1841 340 476 165 ja1983

Re: SQLite and callbacks

2011-02-07 Thread Branko Čibej
On 07.02.2011 21:51, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> A lot of wc databases out there will be >> so small that the user will hardly notice the memory increase. > All we'd be doing is allowing sqlite to flush data to disk if needed. > Even with a temporary table backed by a file, most operations happen in

Re: svn commit: r1068169 - /subversion/trunk/tools/server-side/svn-populate-node-origins-index.c

2011-02-07 Thread Daniel Shahaf
hwri...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 22:09:15 -: > Author: hwright > Date: Mon Feb 7 22:09:15 2011 > New Revision: 1068169 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1068169&view=rev > Log: > * tools/server-side/svn-populate-node-origins-index.c > (index_revision_adds): Update a

Re: svn commit: r1068029 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c

2011-02-07 Thread Daniel Shahaf
The new function should be marked 'static'. Also, they aren't in the proper namespaces: one is in svn_ despite being file-private, and the other is in apr_'s space. stevek...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 17:43:25 -: > Author: steveking > Date: Mon Feb 7 17:43:24 2011 > New Revisi

Re: Proposal: Use decorators in test suite for XFail, Skip, etc

2011-02-07 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > Hyrum K Wright hyrumwright.org> writes: >> >> [[[ >> >> Index: subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/testcase.py >> === >> --- subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/testcase.py      (r

Re: [PATCH] Re: Regarding issue 3690 - Work in progress

2011-02-07 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:41 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Hyrum K Wright wrote on Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 23:14:10 +: >> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote: >> > hwright noorul: ignored_props_mod takes a list of properties, yes (as >> >        opposed to a blanket "ignore all pr

Re: [PATCH] - Fix for issue #3792

2011-02-07 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Noorul Islam K M wrote on Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 12:55:55 +0530: > Daniel Shahaf writes: > > Noorul Islam K M wrote on Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 14:15:48 +0530: > >> + if (info->depth == svn_depth_exclude) > >> +SVN_ERR(svn_cmdline_printf(pool, _("Depth: exclude\n"))); > >> > > > > I know that the

Re: [PATCH] issue #3719 fix slow large checkouts on Windows

2011-02-07 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Neil Bird wrote on Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 12:53:31 +: > Around about 04/02/11 12:06, Neil Bird typed ... > >It's turning out to be the PITA I expected. > > OK, I've backported enough of the trunk copy to get it compiling > for Linux, but it now fails 2 tests. I'll investigate next week. > It

Re: Hi, I want to backport "FSFS Packing of revision property shards" feature to my private subversion-1.6.x branch

2011-02-07 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Start with Paul Querna's patch (see contribulyzer), then look in the logs for follow-up commits. This is head-of-trunk code, and as such may eat your disk. You're about to try a mix-and-match, thus it may eat your backups too. Thanks for testing this! Daniel Kirby Zhou wrote on Sat, Feb 05,

Re: svn commit: r1067195 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/svn_checksum.h libsvn_client/export.c libsvn_subr/checksum.c

2011-02-07 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 09:28:04 -0600: > Reviewing my own commits... > > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:20 AM, wrote: > > +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/export.c Fri Feb  4 15:20:50 > > 2011 > > @@ -900,8 +900,9 @@ close_file(void *file_baton, > >   actual_checksu

Re: [PATCH] Re: Regarding issue 3690 - Work in progress

2011-02-07 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 23:14:10 +: > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote: > > hwright noorul: ignored_props_mod takes a list of properties, yes (as > >        opposed to a blanket "ignore all prop mods") > > > > hwright what you are saying > >        is

Re: Proposal: Use decorators in test suite for XFail, Skip, etc

2011-02-07 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Benjamin Peterson wrote on Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 03:22:06 +: > Hyrum K Wright hyrumwright.org> writes: > > +if type(issues) == type(0): > > You should use isinstance(issues, int). Or even better see below. Thanks for your input; I'll remember it for next time.

Re: svn commit: r1067678 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_util/caching.c

2011-02-07 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On 07.02.2011 13:40, Philip Martin wrote: stef...@apache.org writes: Author: stefan2 Date: Sun Feb 6 14:37:29 2011 New Revision: 1067678 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1067678&view=rev Log: Changing caching defaults to "16MB membuffer cache, fulltext caching on". * subversion/libsvn_f

Re: [PATCH] Re: Regarding issue 3690 - Work in progress

2011-02-07 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote: > "noorul Islam. Kamal Malmiyoda" writes: > >> On Feb 3, 2011, at 5:39 AM, "Hyrum K Wright" wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote: Is ignored_prop_mods list functionality completely implemented? >>>

Re: Proposal: Use decorators in test suite for XFail, Skip, etc

2011-02-07 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 13:35:11 +: > Just use them both. Order *shouldn't* matter. (I think.) Pretty sure it *does* matter: e.g., when you combine XFail and Skip, one of them causes the test to be run and one causes it not to be run --- and we did have some instances of

apr_file_flush and short writes

2011-02-07 Thread Blair Zajac
[I sent this to d...@apr.apache.org but haven't received a response. Thread here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/201102.mbox/%3cf7b1928d-d32f-48dd-b8d9-80b26906a...@orcaware.com%3E . Given the importance of writing complete files for svn, could somebody take a look and see if

Re: Cleaning up XFails: locks-test.exe 9 and 10

2011-02-07 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 02/07/2011 03:44 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > Paul Burba writes: > >> Do "DAV clients sometimes LOCK non-existent paths, as a way of >> reserving names"? I'm not sure exactly what that means, does anyone >> have an inkling? > > In subversion/mod_dav_svn/lock.c:append_locks the code does a PUT

Re: SQLite and callbacks

2011-02-07 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:32:48PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 07.02.2011 17:10, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > The bug is probabaly in the following query. > > Maybe the INSERT OR REPLACE doesn't work as intended? > > And why is COMMIT TRANSACTION commented, BTW? Is this the problem? > > > > -- ST

Re: SQLite and callbacks

2011-02-07 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:23:23PM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > I've been wondering about the question "how about storing/buffering > the entire query results in memory?" Would this really be a problem, > even for very large working copies? > > I have a quite large working copy checked out here

Re: Cleaning up XFails: locks-test.exe 9 and 10

2011-02-07 Thread Philip Martin
Paul Burba writes: > Do "DAV clients sometimes LOCK non-existent paths, as a way of > reserving names"? I'm not sure exactly what that means, does anyone > have an inkling? In subversion/mod_dav_svn/lock.c:append_locks the code does a PUT of a 0-byte file when an attempt is made to lock a non-e

Re: SQLite and callbacks

2011-02-07 Thread Branko Čibej
On 07.02.2011 21:23, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 05:18:57PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:55:47AM -0500, Mark Phippard wrote: On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:

Re: SQLite and callbacks

2011-02-07 Thread Branko Čibej
On 07.02.2011 17:10, Stefan Sperling wrote: > The bug is probabaly in the following query. > Maybe the INSERT OR REPLACE doesn't work as intended? > And why is COMMIT TRANSACTION commented, BTW? Is this the problem? > > -- STMT_REPLACE_ACTUAL_PROPS_IN_CACHE > INSERT OR REPLACE INTO temp_query_cache

Re: SQLite and callbacks

2011-02-07 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 05:18:57PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:55:47AM -0500, Mark Phippard wrote: >> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> > >> > > Where is the temporary table stored?

Cleaning up XFails: locks-test.exe 9 and 10

2011-02-07 Thread Paul Burba
Six years ago we set these two lock tests to XFail (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=853631): C:\SVN\src-trunk>Debug\subversion\tests\libsvn_fs\locks-test.exe --list --mode-filter xfail Test # Mode Test Description -- - 9XFAIL able to reserv

Re: svn commit: r1068029 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c

2011-02-07 Thread Blair Zajac
On 02/07/2011 09:43 AM, stevek...@apache.org wrote: Author: steveking Date: Mon Feb 7 17:43:24 2011 New Revision: 1068029 + +/* This is correct, we don't twist the filename if it is will + * definately be shorter than 248 characters. It merits some Little grammar and spelling cleanup

Re: svn commit: r1067687 - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/libsvn_fs_util/caching.c subversion/svnserve/main.c

2011-02-07 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On 07.02.2011 15:38, Philip Martin wrote: Philip Martin writes: Stefan Sperling writes: On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 11:51:11AM +, Philip Martin wrote: stef...@apache.org writes: Author: stefan2 Date: Sun Feb 6 15:51:15 2011 New Revision: 1067687 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=10

Re: mark .svn folders to not get indexed

2011-02-07 Thread Stefan Küng
On 07.02.2011 19:23, C. Michael Pilato wrote: On 02/07/2011 12:31 PM, Stefan Küng wrote: On 07.02.2011 16:28, C. Michael Pilato wrote: Is there at least some attribution that needs to happen if we add it to our codebase? Actually, it's a copy of the function utf8_to_unicode_path() that's part

Re: mark .svn folders to not get indexed

2011-02-07 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 02/07/2011 12:31 PM, Stefan Küng wrote: > On 07.02.2011 16:28, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> Is there at least some attribution that needs to happen if we add it to our >> codebase? > > Actually, it's a copy of the function utf8_to_unicode_path() that's part of > apr, but apr doesn't export that

Re: Buildbots failing after reintegration of diff-optimizations-bytes

2011-02-07 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Philip Martin >> wrote: >>> Johan Corveleyn writes: >>> Apparently I broke the builds on the builtbots yesterday evening, after integrating

Re: mark .svn folders to not get indexed

2011-02-07 Thread Stefan Küng
On 07.02.2011 16:28, C. Michael Pilato wrote: On 02/06/2011 09:27 AM, Stefan Küng wrote: On 06.02.2011 11:43, Bert Huijben wrote: Note that this patch is not really what you want: It doesn't handle UTF-8, nor long path names (which apr's version would do for us). We need to support both when w

Re: SQLite and callbacks

2011-02-07 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 05:18:57PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:55:47AM -0500, Mark Phippard wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > > > Where is the temporary table stored? Is it back by a file or memory? > > > If backed by memory, d

Re: SQLite and callbacks

2011-02-07 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:55:47AM -0500, Mark Phippard wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > Where is the temporary table stored? Is it back by a file or memory? > > If backed by memory, do we have to worry about memory consumption for > > large working copies? >

Re: SQLite and callbacks

2011-02-07 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 04:52:30PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > I like this patch a lot and think we should commit it after fixing > the test failure. The test is failing because your code lists both the BASE properties and the ACTUAL properties for a node which had its props changed: sqlite>

Re: SQLite and callbacks

2011-02-07 Thread Mark Phippard
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > Where is the temporary table stored? Is it back by a file or memory? > If backed by memory, do we have to worry about memory consumption for > large working copies? The patch says it is backed by a file. -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://

Re: SQLite and callbacks

2011-02-07 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:43:41PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:30:15AM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote: > > On 07.02.2011 02:52, Branko Čibej wrote: > > > Note that I didn't run the tests with this patch, so I'm not claiming it > > > to be bug-free. In fact there's one bug

Re: svn commit: r1067380 [1/3] - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline: ./ svntest/

2011-02-07 Thread Philip Martin
> I haven't tested it, but the Right solution feels like we should make > the tests not call each other. Either they should be combined into > one test, or the common code should be factored out into a helper > method. What benefit does having the called test give, if the *exact* > same code is

Re: mark .svn folders to not get indexed

2011-02-07 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 02/06/2011 09:27 AM, Stefan Küng wrote: > On 06.02.2011 11:43, Bert Huijben wrote: > >> Note that this patch is not really what you want: It doesn't handle UTF-8, >> nor long path names (which apr's version would do for us). We need to >> support both when we don't want to introduce a regressio

Re: svn commit: r1067380 [1/3] - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline: ./ svntest/

2011-02-07 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > Philip Martin writes: > >> hwri...@apache.org writes: >> >>> Author: hwright >>> Date: Sat Feb  5 02:17:32 2011 >>> New Revision: 1067380 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1067380&view=rev >>> Log: >>> Use Python decorators to den

Re: Buildbots failing after reintegration of diff-optimizations-bytes

2011-02-07 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Philip Martin > wrote: >> Johan Corveleyn writes: >> >>> Apparently I broke the builds on the builtbots yesterday evening, >>> after integrating the diff-optimizations-bytes branch. Sorry for that. >>> >>> T

Re: Buildbots failing after reintegration of diff-optimizations-bytes

2011-02-07 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > Johan Corveleyn writes: > >> Apparently I broke the builds on the builtbots yesterday evening, >> after integrating the diff-optimizations-bytes branch. Sorry for that. >> >> There were two problems: >> - Failing diff-diff3-test.exe (actuall

Re: svn commit: r1067687 - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/libsvn_fs_util/caching.c subversion/svnserve/main.c

2011-02-07 Thread Philip Martin
Philip Martin writes: > Stefan Sperling writes: > >> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 11:51:11AM +, Philip Martin wrote: >>> stef...@apache.org writes: >>> >>> > Author: stefan2 >>> > Date: Sun Feb 6 15:51:15 2011 >>> > New Revision: 1067687 >>> > >>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1067687

Re: svn commit: r1067687 - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/libsvn_fs_util/caching.c subversion/svnserve/main.c

2011-02-07 Thread Philip Martin
Stefan Sperling writes: > On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 11:51:11AM +, Philip Martin wrote: >> stef...@apache.org writes: >> >> > Author: stefan2 >> > Date: Sun Feb 6 15:51:15 2011 >> > New Revision: 1067687 >> > >> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1067687&view=rev >> > Log: >> > Merged lat

Re: svn commit: r1067380 [1/3] - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline: ./ svntest/

2011-02-07 Thread Philip Martin
Philip Martin writes: > hwri...@apache.org writes: > >> Author: hwright >> Date: Sat Feb 5 02:17:32 2011 >> New Revision: 1067380 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1067380&view=rev >> Log: >> Use Python decorators to denote XFail, Skip, SkipUnless and Wimp tests. >> Also, >> add Issu

Re: Proposal: Use decorators in test suite for XFail, Skip, etc

2011-02-07 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Arwin Arni wrote: > On Saturday 05 February 2011 01:46 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:54 PM, C. Michael Pilato >>  wrote: >>> >>> On 02/04/2011 02:09 PM, Greg Stein wrote: On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:15, Hyrum K Wright  wrote:

Re: svn commit: r1067380 [1/3] - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline: ./ svntest/

2011-02-07 Thread Philip Martin
hwri...@apache.org writes: > Author: hwright > Date: Sat Feb 5 02:17:32 2011 > New Revision: 1067380 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1067380&view=rev > Log: > Use Python decorators to denote XFail, Skip, SkipUnless and Wimp tests. Also, > add Issue decorators where appropriate. authz_

Re: Inconsistency in blame

2011-02-07 Thread Arwin Arni
On Monday 07 February 2011 06:37 PM, Arwin Arni wrote: Hi All, I recently discovered what appears to be a bug. When I blame a file that was added to a branch (say branch A) via a merge (from, say branch B), the revisions column is populated with the blame of the original file (as it is in bra

Inconsistency in blame

2011-02-07 Thread Arwin Arni
Hi All, I recently discovered what appears to be a bug. When I blame a file that was added to a branch (say branch A) via a merge (from, say branch B), the revisions column is populated with the blame of the original file (as it is in branch B). I would expect it to be populated with the rev

Re: svn commit: r1067678 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_util/caching.c

2011-02-07 Thread Philip Martin
stef...@apache.org writes: > Author: stefan2 > Date: Sun Feb 6 14:37:29 2011 > New Revision: 1067678 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1067678&view=rev > Log: > Changing caching defaults to "16MB membuffer cache, fulltext caching on". > > * subversion/libsvn_fs_util/caching.c: > (cache_

RE: [PATCH] New XFail test for the issue 3781

2011-02-07 Thread Kamesh Jayachandran
Hi Prabhu, My review comment about your patch. I guess you test the following case sensitiveness, * section name case sensitivity * path only case sensitivity * case sensitivity for read * case sensitivity for write. If I represent it as Matrix, SectionPath read case1 case3 wri

Re: Buildbots failing after reintegration of diff-optimizations-bytes

2011-02-07 Thread Philip Martin
Johan Corveleyn writes: > Apparently I broke the builds on the builtbots yesterday evening, > after integrating the diff-optimizations-bytes branch. Sorry for that. > > There were two problems: > - Failing diff-diff3-test.exe (actually hanging). This was rectified > in r1067839. > > - Failing (py

Re: svn commit: r1067687 - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/libsvn_fs_util/caching.c subversion/svnserve/main.c

2011-02-07 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 11:51:11AM +, Philip Martin wrote: > stef...@apache.org writes: > > > Author: stefan2 > > Date: Sun Feb 6 15:51:15 2011 > > New Revision: 1067687 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1067687&view=rev > > Log: > > Merged latest caching bug fixes from performanc

Re: svn commit: r1067687 - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/libsvn_fs_util/caching.c subversion/svnserve/main.c

2011-02-07 Thread Philip Martin
stef...@apache.org writes: > Author: stefan2 > Date: Sun Feb 6 15:51:15 2011 > New Revision: 1067687 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1067687&view=rev > Log: > Merged latest caching bug fixes from performance branch: > revisions 1029232, 1032333, 1033040, 1033057 and 1033294 > (support f

Re: SQLite and callbacks

2011-02-07 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:30:15AM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 07.02.2011 02:52, Branko Čibej wrote: > > Note that I didn't run the tests with this patch, so I'm not claiming it > > to be bug-free. In fact there's one bug in the recursive proplist of the > > WC root, where the root props show u

Buildbots failing after reintegration of diff-optimizations-bytes

2011-02-07 Thread Johan Corveleyn
Apparently I broke the builds on the builtbots yesterday evening, after integrating the diff-optimizations-bytes branch. Sorry for that. There were two problems: - Failing diff-diff3-test.exe (actually hanging). This was rectified in r1067839. - Failing (python) bindings. I could use some help wi

Re: Cannot get the revision information from the scm repository :

2011-02-07 Thread Johan Corveleyn
Please do not cross-post between users@ and dev@. This is really a usage question (not about the development of subversion), so belongs on users@. [ I've left dev@ in cc for this one reply, please drop it from further replies. ] More below ... On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Vishal Jain wrote:

Cannot get the revision information from the scm repository :

2011-02-07 Thread Vishal Jain
Hi, I am trying to build my project on Eclipse, netbeans as well as on command line I am executing mvn install I am getting following error message : Provider message: The svn command failed. Command output: svn: This client is too old to work with working copy '.'. You need to get a newer Subv

Re: SQLite and callbacks

2011-02-07 Thread Branko Čibej
On 07.02.2011 02:52, Branko Čibej wrote: > Note that I didn't run the tests with this patch, so I'm not claiming it > to be bug-free. In fact there's one bug in the recursive proplist of the > WC root, where the root props show up twice -- there's an issue with the > filter in the query there. But

Re: cache-membuffer compiler warnings

2011-02-07 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On 07.02.2011 02:03, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Stefan, [[[ % make -s subversion/libsvn_subr/cache-membuffer.c:1223: warning: ‘svn_membuffer_cache_get_partial’ defined but not used subversion/libsvn_subr/cache-membuffer.c:1250: warning: ‘svn_membuffer_cache_is_cachable’ defined but not used % grep -