On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Julian Foad
> wrote:
>> First we need to clarify what "@a path (a file,)" means. From the
>> discussion below I gather "a file" means an absolute local filesystem path,
>> so let's say so.
>
> Yes absolute OS
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 02:42:52 +0300:
> Neels Hofmeyr wrote on Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 01:29:09 +0200:
> > Somewhere between r1454789 and r1457253 on trunk, that's three to
> > four weeks ago, 'commit', 'copy' and 'merge' got dramatically faster: as
> > much as 80%, and more! Ama
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 02:42:52 +0300:
> Neels Hofmeyr wrote on Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 01:29:09 +0200:
> > Somewhere between r1454789 and r1457253 on trunk, that's three to
> > four weeks ago, 'commit', 'copy' and 'merge' got dramatically faster: as
> > much as 80%, and more! Ama
Neels Hofmeyr wrote on Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 01:29:09 +0200:
> Somewhere between r1454789 and r1457253 on trunk, that's three to
> four weeks ago, 'commit', 'copy' and 'merge' got dramatically faster: as
> much as 80%, and more! Amazing.
Ahem, you should probably correlate that with whenever our VM
Gabriela Gibson wrote on Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 22:36:57 +0100:
> [[[
>
> Disable ANSI color for dumb terminals, fix logic bug where
> dimensions of (0,0) was treated as a positive result,
> re-factored _run_tests to remove repeated calculation of
> line_length.
>
> * build/run_tests.py
> (_get_ter
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:44:12 + ne...@apache.org wrote:
> 1.7.0@1181106 vs. trunk@1462907
> Started at Mon Apr 1 00:26:11 UTC 2013
>
> *DISCLAIMER* - This tests only file://-URL access on a GNU/Linux VM.
> This is intended to measure changes in performance of the local
> working copy layer, *o
Log:
[[[ Followup to r1420334: Adding new tests.
* subversiom/bindings/swig/python/tests/checksum.py
Writing new tests to ensure robustness of svn_checksum_match(),
svn_checksum_dup() and svn_checksum_empty_checksum().
Patch by: Shivani Poddar ]]]
Regards,
Shivani Poddar,
irc-nick - Pods
On 4/1/13 10:25 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 03/31/2013 12:31 AM, Blair Zajac wrote:
Question on svn_repos_load_fs4() and svn_repos_get_fs_build_parser4() (maybe
other functions have a similar text):
* @note If @a start_rev and @a end_rev are valid revisions, this
* function presumes the
On 01/04/13 01:31, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
I reworked hunk 2 because I found a bug.
The actual problem I saw was caused because the script didn't handle the
case where the terminal dimension returns as (0,0). I've fixed
this in the new patch, and cleaned up inefficient code.
> I did note, though
On 03/28/2013 11:27 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.6.21 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
Summary:
+1 to release.
Platform:
Linux 3.2.0-39-generic-pae
Ubuntu 12.04.2 (precise) Linu
Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 28.03.2013 22:07, Julian Foad wrote:
>> Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 28.03.2013 21:38, Julian Foad wrote:
I like the focused API, but I also see how the automatic merge can be
considered to fill in a bit of missing functionality that merge_peg
ought to p
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: stef...@apache.org [mailto:stef...@apache.org]
> > Sent: zaterdag 30 maart 2013 19:07
> > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: svn commit: r1462828 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/include:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> First we need to clarify what "@a path (a file,)" means. From the discussion
> below I gather "a file" means an absolute local filesystem path, so let's say
> so.
Yes absolute OS filesystem path. I prefer saying OS filesystem path
because it
On 03/31/2013 12:31 AM, Blair Zajac wrote:
> Question on svn_repos_load_fs4() and svn_repos_get_fs_build_parser4() (maybe
> other functions have a similar text):
>
> * @note If @a start_rev and @a end_rev are valid revisions, this
> * function presumes the revisions as numbered in @a dumpstream
> -Original Message-
> From: stef...@apache.org [mailto:stef...@apache.org]
> Sent: zaterdag 30 maart 2013 19:07
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1462828 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/include:
> svn_fs.h svn_ra_svn.h
>
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sat Mar 30 1
Here's the current doc string of svn_repos_authz_read2():
/**
* Read authz configuration data from @a path (a file, repos relative
* url, an absolute file url, or a registry path) into @a *authz_p,
* allocated in @a pool.
*
* If @a groups_path (a file, repos relative url, an absolute file ur
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> How about forbidding PATH to be a repos-relative URL, but permitting it
> to be a relpath, that is then interpreted relative to the repos root.
> The conversion is trivial, just +2 on the argument, but it avoids
> "non-canonical" and "^/ URLs
On 04/01/2013 11:25 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 03/31/2013 12:31 AM, Blair Zajac wrote:
>> Question on svn_repos_load_fs4() and svn_repos_get_fs_build_parser4() (maybe
>> other functions have a similar text):
>>
>> * @note If @a start_rev and @a end_rev are valid revisions, this
>> * functi
On 03/31/2013 12:31 AM, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 03/29/2013 01:17 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> Devs,
>>
>> I've just completed my review of the new-in-1.8 public APIs, minus the bits
>> that Philip reviewed (thanks!) and the new merge-related stuff which, if I
>> understand from recent threads co
On 03/30/2013 02:26 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> r1462828 addresses the issues listed for svn_fs.h and svn_ra_svn.h.
> Please review.
The zero-copy-limit stuff looks good. I don't quite understand the bit
about svn_fs_verify() possibly ignoring the 'start' and 'end' parameters
altogether. From c
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.6.21 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on April
> 4th so please try and g
29 mar 2013 kl. 03.03 skrev Julian Foad:
Mattias Engdegård wrote:
The patch assumes that svn_node_none, svn_node_unknown or
svn_wc_operation_none
cannot occur here. Please confirm or refute.
I haven't checked whether these can occur in this message.
svn_node_unknown can certainly occur
22 matches
Mail list logo
