Re: New release

2023-11-29 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Great work! :-) /Daniel Den tors 30 nov. 2023 kl 06:21 skrev Nathan Hartman < hartman.nat...@gmail.com>: > I have kept myself busy studying the information in HACKING [1], in > Mark's SVN Release Management repo [2], in tools/dist/release.py, etc. > > A quick test run with release.py seems to

Re: New release

2023-11-29 Thread Nathan Hartman
I have kept myself busy studying the information in HACKING [1], in Mark's SVN Release Management repo [2], in tools/dist/release.py, etc. A quick test run with release.py seems to work (mostly) correctly. It successfully installs the needed Autoconf, Libtool, and SWIG. It is able to generate

Re: New release

2023-11-12 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den sön 12 nov. 2023 kl 07:18 skrev Nathan Hartman : > On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 9:16 AM Daniel Sahlberg > wrote: > > > > Den fre 10 nov. 2023 kl 15:09 skrev Nathan Hartman < > hartman.nat...@gmail.com>: > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 8:02 AM Johan Corveleyn > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Nathan, >

Re: New release

2023-11-11 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 9:16 AM Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > > Den fre 10 nov. 2023 kl 15:09 skrev Nathan Hartman : >> >> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 8:02 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote: >>> >>> Hi Nathan, >>> >>> Sorry I haven't helped so far ... I should be able to say something >>> useful here, since I'm a

Re: New release

2023-11-10 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den fre 10 nov. 2023 kl 15:09 skrev Nathan Hartman : > On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 8:02 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > >> Hi Nathan, >> >> Sorry I haven't helped so far ... I should be able to say something >> useful here, since I'm a java dev in my dayjob. But I have been >> drowning a bit in that

Re: New release

2023-11-10 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 8:02 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > Sorry I haven't helped so far ... I should be able to say something > useful here, since I'm a java dev in my dayjob. But I have been > drowning a bit in that same dayjob lately, so I can barely find the > time to scan these

Re: New release

2023-11-10 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 6:08 PM Nathan Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 12:00 AM Nathan Hartman > wrote: > > Previously I mentioned I plan to RM for the upcoming 1.14.3 release. > > This being my first time, I need to solve some issues first. > > > > One of these, which has been a

Re: New release

2023-11-09 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 12:00 AM Nathan Hartman wrote: > Previously I mentioned I plan to RM for the upcoming 1.14.3 release. > This being my first time, I need to solve some issues first. > > One of these, which has been a stumbling block for me since the > beginning, is getting the JavaHL

Re: New release

2023-11-03 Thread Mark Phippard
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 6:45 AM Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > > Den fre 3 nov. 2023 kl 10:00 skrev Stefan Sperling : >> >> On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 12:00:32AM -0400, Nathan Hartman wrote: > > [...] >> >> > >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Previously I mentioned I plan to RM for the upcoming 1.14.3 release.

Re: New release

2023-11-03 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den fre 3 nov. 2023 kl 10:00 skrev Stefan Sperling : > On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 12:00:32AM -0400, Nathan Hartman wrote: > [...] > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > Previously I mentioned I plan to RM for the upcoming 1.14.3 release. > > This being my first time, I need to solve some issues first. > > > >

Re: New release

2023-11-02 Thread Nathan Hartman
; >>> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 08:43:59AM +0200, Daniel Sahlberg wrote: >>> > > Hi, >>> > > >>> > > There are quite a number of improvements waiting to be released. Can we >>> > > muster the energy to do a new release? >>> &

Re: New release

2023-10-16 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Hi, >> > > >> > > There are quite a number of improvements waiting to be released. Can >> we >> > > muster the energy to do a new release? >> > > >> > > In trunk there are a lot of changes that warrant a 1.15, but before >>

Re: New release

2023-10-14 Thread Nathan Hartman
aiting to be released. Can we > > > muster the energy to do a new release? > > > > > > In trunk there are a lot of changes that warrant a 1.15, but before > doing > > > that I think we should also go back to the discussion of changing the / > > > addin

Re: New release

2023-10-13 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 5:35 PM Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 08:43:59AM +0200, Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There are quite a number of improvements waiting to be released. Can we > > muster the energy to do a new release? &g

Re: New release

2023-10-13 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 08:43:59AM +0200, Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > Hi, > > There are quite a number of improvements waiting to be released. Can we > muster the energy to do a new release? > > In trunk there are a lot of changes that warrant a 1.15, but before doing > that I

New release

2023-10-13 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Hi, There are quite a number of improvements waiting to be released. Can we muster the energy to do a new release? In trunk there are a lot of changes that warrant a 1.15, but before doing that I think we should also go back to the discussion of changing the / adding a checksum algorithm

Re: New release

2022-01-13 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den tors 13 jan. 2022 kl 11:36 skrev Johan Corveleyn : > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 5:12 PM Daniel Sahlberg > wrote: > > Den tis 11 jan. 2022 15:34Julian Foad skrev: > >> > >> Johan Corveleyn wrote: > >> > Thanks for starting to get this ball rolling, Daniel. > >> > >> Seconded. > >> > >> >> I

Re: New release

2022-01-13 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 5:12 PM Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > Den tis 11 jan. 2022 15:34Julian Foad skrev: >> >> Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> > Thanks for starting to get this ball rolling, Daniel. >> >> Seconded. >> >> >> I have been pondering the question of which release(s) and in what >> >> order. I

Re: New release

2022-01-11 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den tis 11 jan. 2022 15:34Julian Foad skrev: > Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > Thanks for starting to get this ball rolling, Daniel. > > Seconded. > > >> I have been pondering the question of which release(s) and in what > >> order. I think 1.14.2 and 1.10.8 first, then 1.15.x later. > > Sounds good.

Re: New release

2022-01-11 Thread Julian Foad
Johan Corveleyn wrote: > Thanks for starting to get this ball rolling, Daniel. Seconded. >> I have been pondering the question of which release(s) and in what >> order. I think 1.14.2 and 1.10.8 first, then 1.15.x later. Sounds good. As mentioned in another thread just now, I'm now able to

Re: New release

2022-01-11 Thread Johan Corveleyn
Thanks for starting to get this ball rolling, Daniel. On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 6:41 AM Nathan Hartman wrote: ... > I have been pondering the question of which release(s) and in what > order. I think 1.14.2 and 1.10.8 first, then 1.15.x later. +1 > Regarding drumming up support for the backports:

Re: New release

2022-01-05 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 1:39 PM Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > > Hi, > > We need to start thinking about if/how/when we can do a new release. Nathan > and I started talking about this last August but for work issues neither of > us had the time then. > > There is one issue res

New release

2022-01-05 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Hi, We need to start thinking about if/how/when we can do a new release. Nathan and I started talking about this last August but for work issues neither of us had the time then. There is one issue resolved by Stefan Sperling (r1894734) which would be good to have released. It is nominated