Re: Potential regression: high server-side memory consumption during import (was: Subversion 1.10 RC1?)

On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 05:15:46PM +0300, Evgeny Kotkov wrote: > Unless I am missing something, this might be worth considering before the > 1.10 GA release. Evgeny, you were entirely right about calling this out as a release blocker. I am sorry for having suggested otherwise.

Re: Potential regression: high server-side memory consumption during import (was: Subversion 1.10 RC1?)

On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 07:21:15PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > I am just questioning the usefulness of halting the presses and restarting > the soak for another month for something that isn't a security / data > corruption issue. I anticipate that problems of similar severity to this > one

Re: Potential regression: high server-side memory consumption during import (was: Subversion 1.10 RC1?)

On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 09:02:02PM +0300, Evgeny Kotkov wrote: > Stefan Sperling writes: > > > I'd rather ship 1.10.0 at the prospected release date followed closely > > by 1.10.1 to fix bugs such as these, than delay general access to 1.10.0 > > even further. > > While I do not

Re: Potential regression: high server-side memory consumption during import (was: Subversion 1.10 RC1?)

Stefan Sperling writes: > I'd rather ship 1.10.0 at the prospected release date followed closely > by 1.10.1 to fix bugs such as these, than delay general access to 1.10.0 > even further. While I do not have significant objections against such plan, I find the idea of shipping a

Re: Potential regression: high server-side memory consumption during import (was: Subversion 1.10 RC1?)

On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 05:15:46PM +0300, Evgeny Kotkov wrote: > Unless I am missing something, this might be worth considering before the > 1.10 GA release. Not about the actual bug, just a meta comment on the process: I'd rather ship 1.10.0 at the prospected release date followed closely by

Re: Potential regression: high server-side memory consumption during import (was: Subversion 1.10 RC1?)

Stefan Fuhrmann writes: > Would it be possible for you to bisect this to find the offending revision? > My random guess would be that in the context of mod_dav_svn, we might use > an unsuitable pool for authz caching. While looking through the various 1.10-related topics, I

Re: Potential regression: high server-side memory consumption during import (was: Subversion 1.10 RC1?)

On 05.12.2017 22:05, Evgeny Kotkov wrote: Julian Foad writes: After any issues raised in this discussion are resolved, we feel we should go ahead and produce RC1 as soon as possible. I think that I am seeing a 1.10 regression in terms of httpd's memory usage during

Potential regression: high server-side memory consumption during import (was: Subversion 1.10 RC1?)

Julian Foad writes: > After any issues raised in this discussion are resolved, we feel we should > go ahead and produce RC1 as soon as possible. I think that I am seeing a 1.10 regression in terms of httpd's memory usage during large imports. In my environment, when I