On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 02:01:27AM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Devil's advocate: It's a very narrow-scoped option, and might become
obsolete if we extend this part of the code a bit.
Yes, that's why I wasn't truely happy with it.
The plan to detect the proper filename dynamically using the
Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 20:42:55 +0200:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 04:51:15PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
s...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:05:15 -:
Author: stsp
Date: Wed Sep 15 10:05:14 2010
New Revision: 997249
URL:
s...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:05:15 -:
Author: stsp
Date: Wed Sep 15 10:05:14 2010
New Revision: 997249
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997249view=rev
Log:
Add an --old-patch-target-names option to svn patch.
This option is useful in two cases:
1) A patch
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 04:51:15PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
s...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:05:15 -:
Author: stsp
Date: Wed Sep 15 10:05:14 2010
New Revision: 997249
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997249view=rev
Log:
Add an --old-patch-target-names
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 04:51:15PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
s...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:05:15 -:
Author: stsp
Date: Wed Sep 15 10:05:14 2010
New Revision: 997249
URL:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 08:53:17PM +0200, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
How about just adding '--patch-left' and '--patch-right' or something.
The either both have to used, or neither, and if they are, use those
names as the once in the patch.
I don't like these names because it's not clear what
6 matches
Mail list logo