Stefan Sperling wrote:
Colleagues, I understand that you are expecting a patch. I am sorry, I
am a systems administrator and not a programmer, my code writing
ability does not go beyond scripting.
Can you try this patch and let me know if it works?
Please try this one
Given all the responses in the thread, I'd say we're moving to the single
table for BASE and WORKING node recording. There was a flurry of activity
from me yesterday and this morning regarding NODE_DATA: that was just me
flushing my queue of patches.
The work isn't completely irrelevant, as it
-Original Message-
From: e...@apache.org [mailto:e...@apache.org]
Sent: zondag 5 september 2010 22:16
To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r992886 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc:
wc-queries.sql wc_db.c
Author: ehu
Date: Sun Sep 5 20:16:10 2010
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
+ SVN_ERR(svn_sqlite__get_statement(stmt, pdh-wcroot-sdb,
+STMT_INSERT_NODE_DATA));
+
+ SVN_ERR(svn_sqlite__bindf(stmt, isi, pdh-wcroot-wc_id, base,
+
Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com writes:
When compiled with SVN_DEBUG and SQLITE3_DEBUG and 'svn st' against a
svn trunk WC, a number of things pop out.
We perform 28,062 SQL queries.
It's not just repeat queries that are the problem, we simply make too
many queries. This is mainly
On 06.09.2010 12:16, Philip Martin wrote:
To use a per-directory query strategy we would probably have to cache
data in memory, although not to the same extent as in 1.6. We should
probably avoid having Subversion make status callbacks into the
application while a query is in progress, so we
In r992993 the NODES table design was added. The SVN_WC__NODES conditional
was created to enable known-working code for this schema. The NODES
conditional will be used to flag sections which need to be further looked
into for modification, just as with SINGLE_DB and NODE_DATA.
It would be my idea
On 04/09/2010 17:33, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Aha. Adding exclusive locking into our pragma
[http://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html] calls in svn_sqlite__open:
PRAGMA locking_mode=exclusive;
brings the time for svn st down from 0.680 to 0.310 seconds. And,
yes, the I/O percentages drop
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Bentham [mailto:mj...@artvps.com]
Sent: maandag 6 september 2010 15:07
To: Justin Erenkrantz
Cc: Bert Huijben; Greg Stein; Johan Corveleyn; Subversion Development
Subject: Re: Worried about single-db performance
On 04/09/2010 17:33, Justin
Hi,
'svnrdump dump -r n URL' dumps the revisions from 'n' to HEAD.The attached
patch dumps the single specified revision alone.
[[[
Log:
svnrdump to dump the single specified revision.
* subversion/svnrdump/svnrdump.c
(main): Dump the single specified revision by assigning
Attaching the patch,
Thanks Regards,
Vijayaguru
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 21:49 +0530, Vijayaguru Guruchave wrote:
Hi,
'svnrdump dump -r n URL' dumps the revisions from 'n' to HEAD.The attached
patch dumps the single specified revision alone.
[[[
Log:
svnrdump to dump the single
Hi Vijayguru,
Vijayaguru Guruchave writes:
'svnrdump dump -r n URL' dumps the revisions from 'n' to HEAD.The attached
patch dumps the single specified revision alone.
[[[
Log:
svnrdump to dump the single specified revision.
* subversion/svnrdump/svnrdump.c
(main): Dump the
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:53:24PM +0530, vijayaguru wrote:
Attaching the patch,
Thanks Regards,
Vijayaguru
From the output of svnrdump help dump:
dump: usage: svnrdump dump URL [-r LOWER[:UPPER]]
Dump revisions LOWER to UPPER of repository at remote URL to stdout in a
'dumpfile'
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote:
As I recall, Stefan recently declared the performance branch done.
It's encouraging to see a few intrepid users and devs looking at the
branch and providing feedback.
Through IRC and other conversations, I've
Should you be using SVN_ERR_ASSERT() or one of its variants, here?
-Hyrum
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 5:30 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Sun Sep 5 22:30:09 2010
New Revision: 992905
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=992905view=rev
Log:
Format fix:
Remove spaces
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
As I recall, Stefan recently declared the performance branch done.
Correct. I've just been polishing parts of it over the last
two weeks or so.
It's encouraging to see a few intrepid users and devs looking at the
branch and providing feedback.
Through IRC and other
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
As I recall, Stefan recently declared the performance branch done.
Correct. I've just been polishing parts of it over the last
two weeks or so.
It's encouraging to see a few intrepid
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:09:47AM -, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stsp
Date: Tue Sep 7 00:09:46 2010
New Revision: 993183
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=993183view=rev
Log:
Introduce a new family of functions to parse numbers from strings.
*
I'm having some trouble with svnsync using ssh as a transport between the
source and the sync. Namely, it appears to ignore the username given to it
with --source-username.
I found this email thread
http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2009-09/0035.shtml that talks about this
and suggests it may be a
The buildbots are failing all over the place after this revision...
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 20:09, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stsp
Date: Tue Sep 7 00:09:46 2010
New Revision: 993183
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=993183view=rev
Log:
Introduce a new family of functions to parse
20 matches
Mail list logo
