Re: Better choice for Linux semaphore than spinlock?

Rüdiger: On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 3:51 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote: > On 10/07/2019 08:40 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Oct 2019, 19:47 Doug Robinson, > wrote: > > > > Folks: > > > > I spoke with this user late last week. They stated that they can

Re: Better choice for Linux semaphore than spinlock?

Brane: On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 2:40 PM Branko Čibej wrote: > On Mon, 7 Oct 2019, 19:47 Doug Robinson, > wrote: > >> I spoke with this user late last week. They stated that they can only >> get approximately 400 parallel SVN operations before the "system >> time" consumes all available CPU for

Re: Better choice for Linux semaphore than spinlock?

On 10/07/2019 08:40 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On Mon, 7 Oct 2019, 19:47 Doug Robinson, > wrote: > > Folks: > > I spoke with this user late last week. They stated that they can only > get approximately 400 parallel SVN operations > before the

Re: Better choice for Linux semaphore than spinlock?

On Mon, 7 Oct 2019, 19:47 Doug Robinson, wrote: > Folks: > > I spoke with this user late last week. They stated that they can only get > approximately 400 parallel SVN operations before the "system time" consumes > all available CPU for an 8-core machine. Adding more cores won't help > because

Re: Better choice for Linux semaphore than spinlock?

Folks: I spoke with this user late last week. They stated that they can only get approximately 400 parallel SVN operations before the "system time" consumes all available CPU for an 8-core machine. Adding more cores won't help because of the nature of spin locks (it makes things worse). Turns

Issue tracker review [was: PMCs: any Hackathon requests? (deadline 11 October)]

On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 11:13 AM Julian Foad wrote: > Nathan Hartman wrote: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN-1722 "svn > > diff may missreport a revision as the working copy." > > Errm... last reviewed 9 years ago. Is it really what it says it is? > > Sadly, we have hundreds of

Re: PMCs: any Hackathon requests? (deadline 11 October)

Nathan Hartman wrote: Perhaps: * 1 "byte size" code quality issue from the issue tracker * 1 website task * 1 Py3 support task Generally, sure, sounds good. Go for it. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN-1722 "svn diff may missreport a revision as the working copy." Errm... last

Re: PMCs: any Hackathon requests? (deadline 11 October)

On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:13 AM Julian Foad wrote: > Moving this thread to dev@ as it should be public [1]. Sally Khudairi wrote: > We received an email from hackCBS 2.0, a hackathon that will be > taking place 19-20 October at the University of Delhi with 700+ > students. > > They are

Re: PMCs: any Hackathon requests? (deadline 11 October)

Moving this thread to dev@ as it should be public [1]. See my responses inline. Sally Khudairi wrote: We received an email from hackCBS 2.0, a hackathon that will be taking place 19-20 October at the University of Delhi with 700+ students. They are interested in our participation by