On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
That sounds like the wrong behaviour as well. By default we should
build as many stable features as possible. If I pass an explict option
to enable/disable a feature that should be a hard requirement.
+1
In
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Forwarding to dev@
Lev Serebryakov wrote on Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 18:21:44 +0400:
Hello, Users.
Now Makefile.in contains:
INSTALL = @INSTALL@
...
INSTALL_BIN = $(LIBTOOL) --mode=install $(INSTALL)
And after
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc/builds/6128
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: svn-x64-ubuntu
Build Reason:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
What's happening here is the Perl bindings are failing.
core.c: In function ‘boot_SVN___Core’:
core.c:42819:5: error: expected expression before ‘/’ token
core.c:42819:37: error: too many decimal points in number
core.c
The following discussion happened on IRC. Which resulted in renaming the
svnmerge.py component to contrib/svnmerge.py. If anyone objects let me
know.
[[[
07:50 @stsp can somebody with the necessary clout on tigris.org remove
the 'svnmerge.py' issue component?
07:50 @stsp people keep assigning
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Julian Foad julianf...@btopenworld.comwrote:
It's time we stopped saying we're attempting to replace CVS and spread a
more up-to-date message. So, if no objections, I'll commit the attached
updates to the FAQ.
+1
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Andreas Krey a.k...@gmx.de wrote:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:36:02 +, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
here! By keeping the software an integrated codebase for clients and
servers, they're able to make protocol changes that you'll be forced
to keep up with in an
We currently have serf 0.3.1 in this file. However, this version
fails to build on Windows due to this problem:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201007.mbox/%3caanlktimjwqifcmss3b6s2gwvrkyglct2-bd6b-jiz...@mail.gmail.com%3E
Is there a particular reason we're still shipping
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
Except that it can't be merely wire protocol. They're remapping the
commit, copy, delete, move,branch, tag, and merge operations of one
source control into the other. That's. not directly comparable,
especially the
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
The 1.6.19 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please get the tarballs from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
and add your signatures there. Thanks!
Please note the following known
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
The serf API wasn't stable in 0.x releases.
ra_serf in svn 1.5/1.6 doesn't support newer serf APIs AFAIK.
According to Paul Burba he tested with serf 1.1.0 and Johan Corveleyn
tested with 0.7.1. I successfully used 0.7.2 on
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
In build/ac-macros/swig.m4 the -ansi flag is explicltly removed for the
Ruby bindings so that gcc accepts things like that.
Thanks, that worked. I've committed something to that effect in r1389658.
I also tracked
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Hyrum K Wright hy...@hyrumwright.org wrote:
The svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc bot currently lives in my basement, and was
recently upgraded to the latest Ubuntu beta release, which bumped a
number of dependency versions. The biggest issue with the bindings is
the bump to
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Hyrum K Wright hy...@hyrumwright.org wrote:
For the time being, the Ruby build step and tests have been commented
out of the relevant scripts.
I think there is value in running a bot on a stock (albeit currently
beta) install of a popular Linux distribution.
stsp poked me on IRC to point out that we've got quite a few
candidates piling up for 1.7.x. So I'd like to start the process for
1.7.7.
I'm planning to roll tarballs on October 3rd which is one week from
today. Given Subversion Live and that a number of us will be
traveling for the next couple
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
In fact, there is. If mod_dav_svn is linked with a different version of
bdb and/or sqlite than the rest of httpd, it will break at best, or
corrupt your repo in the worst case.
Just confirming what brane said above is the
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org wrote:
Interestingly, the case you tried to fix - libraries with
Debian-derived packaging - is also a case where it _is_ safe to link to
multiple versions of db in the same app. But you're right, on many
other platforms, it is
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
If it compiles, links, and loads, then you should be just fine. I don't
believe there are semantic changes within any given entrypoint.
Are there any objections to shipping serf-1.1.0 with our deps package
going forward? Based
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought we did not have a deps package with the 1.7.x releases?
Nevermind then. :D
The documentation for this struct has the following statement in it:
[[[
Same as svn_wc_status3_t, but without the svn_boolean_t 'versioned'
field. Instead an item that is not versioned has the 'entry' field set
to NULL.
]]]
However, svn_wc_status2_t is drastically different from
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:10 PM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc/builds/6234
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:53 AM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc/builds/6270
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
The reply to for the notifications list is now set to come back to the
dev list. Should make it easier for discussions to start in response
to buildbot failures.
The 1.7.7 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please get the tarballs from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
and add your signatures there. Thanks!
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 5:54 AM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote:
On 10/03/2012 03:39 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:51 AM, cmpil...@apache.org wrote:
Author: cmpilato
Date: Wed Oct 3 14:51:36 2012
New Revision: 1393521
URL:
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
The 1.7.7 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please get the tarballs from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
and add
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 6:48 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote:
On 10/04/2012 09:46 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
Perhaps you meant something like:
... it will enter versioned directories, scheduling any unversioned
children thereof for addition.
Sorry -- I just saw that you
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
The 1.7.7 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please get the tarballs from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
and add your signatures there. Thanks!
Branko, I see you add your signatures
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 7:12 AM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote:
That's right. Expat just doesn't care. Some other XML parser might. But
then, I would expect that same parser would croak on any property name with
a colon in it (besides svn:, which we handle specially already).
Given that we're coming up on a couple of opportunities for various
developers to get together an potentially sign keys I thought I'd
bring this subject up.
1) SHA-1 based keys should be migrated off of. The US Government's
requirement of agencies was to stop using SHA-1 by the end of 2010.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
On 05.10.2012 23:43, Ben Reser wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
The 1.7.7 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please get the tarballs from
https
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:49 AM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote:
Honestly, the original phrasing of the docstring remains a better starting
point, in my opinion. Your changes lose the context that all this
discussion about depth and unversioned items in a versioned tree are still
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 4, 2012 4:58 PM, bre...@apache.org wrote:
Author: breser
Date: Thu Oct 4 23:57:26 2012
New Revision: 1394332
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1394332view=rev
Log:
Improve the documentation of the force
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course, it would make more sense to *rename* the parameter to something
more appropriate. skip_versioned_nodes might work.
It'd have to be no_skip_versioned_nodes.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
Voting is currently at:
Unix: 2 (brane, cmpilato)
Windows: (pburba, markphip)
Now at:
Unix: 3 (brane, cmpilato, philip)
Windows: 2 (pburba, markphip)
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
Voting is currently at:
Unix: 2 (brane, cmpilato)
Windows: (pburba, markphip)
Now at:
Unix: 3 (brane, cmpilato, philip)
Windows: 2 (pburba, markphip)
We've
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Hyrum K Wright hy...@hyrumwright.org wrote:
I am interested in participating in the keysigning in Greenwich.
Though I will note that October 8th is a Monday this year, not a
Tuesday. :)
I meant tomorrow Tuesday October 9th. Sorry for the typo and confusion.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
P.S.: I wonder if I should upgrade my 2kbit/SHA512 RSA key to 4kbit?
I don't think there's any particular need to do that at this point. I
used a 4096 key size because I figured it might give me a little more
life out of
] with fingerprint:
8AA2 C10E EAAD 44F9 6972 7AEA B59C E6D6 010C 8AAD
Stefan Sperling [1024D/F59D25F0] with fingerprint:
B1CF 1060 A1E9 34D1 9E86 D6D6 E5D3 0273 F59D 25F0
Mark Phippard [1024D/035A96A9] with fingerprint:
D315 89DB E1C1 E9BA D218 39FD 265D F8A0 035A 96A9
Ben Reser
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Ben Reser bre...@apache.org wrote:
I'm happy to announce the release of Apache Subversion 1.7.7.
Should we adjust the target milestone of issue #4174 (ra_serf
checkout/export aborts early
Those interested in taking part you'll want to bring with you your
keyid/fingerprint/uid information.
E.G.
$ gpg --fingerprint 16A0DE01
pub 4096R/16A0DE01 2011-01-28
Key fingerprint = 19BB CAEF 7B19 B280 A0E2 175E 62D4 8FAD 16A0 DE01
uid Ben Reser b...@reser.org
uid
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Julian Foad julianf...@btopenworld.com wrote:
Ben Reser wrote:
Those interested in taking part you'll want to bring with you your
keyid/fingerprint/uid information.
Here are my keys. The new (4096R) key has just been generated, signed by the
old key
They are indeed. It's always bothered me that we didn't use a stable
type for our revnums:
$ grep svn_revnum_t subversion/include/svn_types.h | grep typedef
typedef long int svn_revnum_t;
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Eh? I thought revnums were longs. Not
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
When I run make check on Mac OS X 10.8.2, it looks like the
case-sensitivity checks now XPASS:
XPASS: op-depth-test 23: test_case_rename on case (in)sensitive system
XPASS: copy_tests.py 102: case-only rename
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On 10.7:
XFAIL: op-depth-test 23: test_case_rename on case (in)sensitive system
XFAIL: copy_tests.py 102: case-only rename
with:
$ apr-1-config --version
1.4.2
This whole thing turns out to be a side effect of r1397145 and I
This commit is clearly wrong... But it also may be demonstrating a
failure in our test suite.
Creating an un-versioned file and then moving a versioned file over it
does not fail.
In the past we'd fail like this:
[[[
$ svn co file:///Users/breser/foo2 foo2-wc
Afoo2-wc/x
Checked out revision
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:30 AM, i...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ivan
Date: Mon Oct 15 11:30:08 2012
New Revision: 1398252
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1398252view=rev
Log:
Make code a little bit more clear and faster.
* subversion/libsvn_subr/error.c
(svn_error_wrap_apr): Use
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:30 AM, i...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ivan
Date: Mon Oct 15 11:30:08 2012
New Revision: 1398252
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1398252view=rev
Log:
Make code a little bit more clear
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Found these two:
subversion/libsvn_subr/cache_config.c:#ifdef APR_HAS_THREADS
subversion/svnserve/main.c:#ifdef APR_HAS_THREADS
(which should use #if, not #ifdef)
I don't have time to audit the entire tree --- I
Regarding this issue: http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3311
We don't support using --depth options other than infinity with
externals. Bert mentions that wc-ng should make it easier to
implement this.
However, given the way svn:externals can be defined I think that it's
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Sat Oct 20 18:35:24 2012
New Revision: 1400498
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1400498view=rev
Log:
On systems without efficient 64 bit atomics, svnadmin should not attempt
to enable revprop caching
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
Oh yes. Eventually I'd like to see something like this:
* The functionality of repo-relative externals replaced with some
flavour of in-repo links, so that the client doesn't even have to
know about them.
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com wrote:
All caches are enabled by default. With revprop packing,
we read the whole packed revprop file only once and put
all items into the cache. That speeds up dump friends.
Also, any manipulation to some revprop
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
Given that we're coming up on a couple of opportunities for various
developers to get together an potentially sign keys I thought I'd
bring this subject up.
1) SHA-1 based keys should be migrated off of. The US Government's
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:58 AM, vijay vi...@collab.net wrote:
Hi,
I am working on patch to add '--include-externals' option to 'svn list'
[Issue #4225].
Let me try to answer few questions in the issue comment [1].
Please correct me if I am wrong.
1. What happens with externals inside of
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Added you to http://wiki.apache.org/subversion/AdminGroup#preview
If you don't want admin access, feel free to add yourself to
ContributorsGroup and drop yourself from AdminGroup
Thanks, admin access is fine.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
b) Sinsheim, Germany November 5th - 8th at ApacheCon EU 2012.
I plan on organizing key signing at both events if there is sufficient
people interested and there will be keys that need signing. Given the
issue the SHA-1 issue
for serf issues.
So, general note: any serf issues you might encounter, log them before
or during next week and I'll be try to solve them during next week.
Lieven
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
Monday November 5th is setup as a Hackathon for ApacheCon. I've
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote:
I think it will be useful to add client platform information to user
agent string, to use it Apache HTTP Server configuration or Subversion
hooks. Within my patch applied user agent will be like this:
SVN/1.8.0 (Windows)
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Blair Zajac bl...@orcaware.com wrote:
Looking at the diff, do you mean 'should be a const'?
Thanks, log fixed.
He did indeed move it the wrong way and fixed it in r1403983.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: danie...@apache.org [mailto:danie...@apache.org]
Sent: woensdag 31 oktober 2012 05:50
To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Julian Foad julianf...@btopenworld.com wrote:
I am not convinced the API is all finalized. Are there reasons why we
need/want to release the API definition into the public name space right now?
If not, I would suggest we move it into the private namespace
This message really belongs on the us...@subversion.apache.org list.
It's difficult to answer your question due to the wide variety of
setups that Subversion can be used with (multiple different servers
e.g. Apache [http], svnserve [svn and svn+ssh]) and clients (command
line client, TortioseSVN,
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
During the SVN Live conferences I asked people, privately, about their
opinion on automatic vs. manual upgrades. The overwhelming response was
that they wait for all the clients to catch up before upgrading. Given
these
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
This is coming up next week. FYI there is already a key signing event
scheduled as part of ApacheCon per the email they sent out earlier:
[[[
- Welcome Reception (Tuesday 6 November at 18:30)
- PGP Keysigning (Tuesday 6
Just a reminder to please +1 the list if you're going to be there.
The count is only at 3 and I suspect that more people will be there.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
Monday November 5th is setup as a Hackathon for ApacheCon. I've added
the Subversion project
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote:
Here is updated patch:
[[[
Add target platform information to user agent string.
* subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/ra_serf.h
(USER_AGENT): Add target platform information.
* subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/ra_svn.h
I worked with Philip today and was able to reproduce the exact problem
he's been seeing. I ended up having to get his full httpd.conf to
figure it out..
Ultimately the problem proved to be that he had this directive:
Timeout 3
Which would mean if we don't tend a connection for 3 seconds Apache
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:43 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com wrote:
A crashed writer process may leave a corrupt protorev and / or
other incomplete files. There is no atomic incremental change
here. The caller (client) using the crashed process is supposed
to detect the crash
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Eric S. Raymond e...@thyrsus.com wrote:
I have whatever I get from the wget recommended in the instructions printed
by configure.
configure doesn't tell you to wget APR and APR-UTIL it tells you to do
a svn checkout. So it does appear that you have a dev
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Eric S. Raymond e...@thyrsus.com wrote:
Yes, the build ran to completion this time. Now I can do the
interesting work, which I've been quiet about because I don't want to
make any promises I can't keep.
Look forward to seeing whatever you're up to.
Actually
First of all thanks for asking these questions, my effort to answer
them gave me even more confidence in the changes.
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
What would be the effect of *not* patching the client?
When I first wrote the patch and tried to apply it to
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Not destroying iterpool would cause rep_write_cleanup() (pool cleanup
handler) not to fire [according to breser], hence not call
unlock_proto_rev(), hence not clear the being_written flag in the txn
object. That
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
No. The check specifically looks for a three-letter prefix ending in a
colon, and allows only one wrong character or transposition. It will
flag svm: but not tsvn:.
svk would pop up for anyone still using (no idea if
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 11:06 PM, vijay vi...@collab.net wrote:
This patch removes the dead code in subversion/svn/list-cmd.c.
'--verbose' option is not valid in XML listing mode. The code will error out
in svn_cl__list() itself when '--verbose' is combined with '--xml'.
Attached the patch
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org wrote:
I don't get why we would want 'propdel --force' at all. Either the
misspelled property exists, or it doesn't.
If the misspelled property exists, probably the user already noticed
the typo, that's why they're deleting it!
On Nov 28, 2012 1:55 PM, Julian Foad julianf...@btopenworld.com wrote:
I tried this on the Centos buildbot today and ran into another issue: the
Perl bindings build fails at link stage. See
http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-centos-gcc/builds/7765/steps/Build/logs/stdio
or here are the last
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Eric S. Raymond e...@thyrsus.com wrote:
I say break the hell out of it. The utility of Internet-scoped
attributions is pretty high in a bunch of different ways (I love me
some Ohloh statistics, there's one). And I doubt server
verification actually buys you
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Eric S. Raymond e...@thyrsus.com wrote:
Actually that wasn't in my plan. It's sufficient that every commit
get an Internet-scoped ID, anonymity isn't required.
Well without making any changes then you have two choices...
1) Have users use whatever local
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:24 AM, vijay vi...@collab.net wrote:
This patch is a follow up to r1414304 (corresponding mail thread [1]). It
renames 'pool' to 'scratch_pool' in list callback functions in
svn/list-cmd.c.
[1] http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2012-11/0352.shtml
r1415646
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Eric S. Raymond e...@thyrsus.com wrote:
Normally, access to the Subversion repositories I use is actually
authenticated
via an ssh key used for login to the server host. I'm not sure in what sense
the username field actually contributes any security-relevant
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
It does yes, if the server has ForceCommand='svnserve -t' configured
in sshd, then path-based authz and/or anon-access=none can be
meaningfully set up --- and these key off of the svn-level authenticated
username (as
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Eric S. Raymond e...@thyrsus.com wrote:
I'm not sure what the entire right design fix for Subversion is here, but
I *am* sure you guys should be paying attention to this now so you can have
the fix ready and deployed by the time forge evolution makes it urgent,
[I reordered some of the blocks from Eric's original to make my reply
flow a little better]
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Eric S. Raymond e...@thyrsus.com wrote:
When it happens, Subversion as it is now isn't going to be able to
play. You guys have a three-way design adhesion between
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Eric S. Raymond e...@thyrsus.com wrote:
This one confines your Unix-ID adhesion to the FULLNAMES array, which
is a long step in the right direction because it means your repo history
will be local-ID-clean.
It confines it to whatever value that python script
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Eric S. Raymond e...@thyrsus.com wrote:
There. You're done. It's backward-compatible (older installations
can ignore the feature and nothing breaks). It's independent of your
authentication method, but you can add auth checks if you care enough.
It scales
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
As for the looping, didn't we put in logic to stop retrying after a number
of request failures? That's probably a reasonable thing to do...I
definitely think a very nice feature of serf is that it *will* retry
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
Maybe it is time to release a Subversion 1.7.8 with this fix in?
(Or even a 1.7.8 with just this fix)
I was going to try to get 1.7.8 started last week but just didn't get to it.
I'll send an email to get 1.7.8 started now.
We've got several fairly important changes already merged onto the
1.7.x branch. Please vote for any additional changes you'd like to
see included in 1.7.8 this week.
I'm planning to roll tarballs on December 10th which is one week from
today. With the expected release date to be December 17th.
identity on different
projects, even open source projects. There are actually Open Source
projects I don't go by Ben Reser or breser or use an email address
that is derived from my name on. In fact some of those projects use
git.
2) If you allow an auto-setting of this identity to something based
Our documentation for svnserve --config-file says
[[[
--config-file=filename
When specified, svnserve reads filename once at program
startup and caches
the svnserve configuration and any passwords and
authorization configura-
tion referenced from
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Julian Foad julianf...@btopenworld.com wrote:
I'm just posting this so you (Philip et el.) can take a look if you want to.
I might proceed by extending the tests to check props and then committing it
if it works, but really I want to factor it better -- maybe
...@elego.de
Ben Reser bre...@fornix.brain.org
Daniel Shahaf ~danielsh@apache
In this case I'd say that the three people you're providing
attribution to here are all committers. Their attribution can be
shortened to just their usernames. Which are: stsp, breser
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Shivani Poddar
shivani.podda...@gmail.com wrote:
Based on the reviews for the earlier PATCH for the svn_checksum.h header's
python binding i have incorporated the required changes and finally have
shaped the earlier patch.
Please find the new patch file
The 1.7.8 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please get the tarballs from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
and add your signatures there.
Thanks!
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Shivani Poddar
shivani.podda...@gmail.com wrote:
Log Message:
Improve support for svn_checksum.h in SWIG bindings
* subversion/bindings/swig/python/tests/checksum.py: Improved test_checksum
Modified:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Gabriela Gibson
gabriela.gib...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm concerned that I shouldn't be altering fs-wrap.c. So a logical
place to put a fix is probably in (set_revision_property).
I could either hand code a for loop, or call the function
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Gabriela Gibson
gabriela.gib...@gmail.com wrote:
The differences between copy-bad-line-endings.expected.dump and
copy-bad-line-endings.dump appear to be:
1. '\r' in the middle of a line is replaced by '\n'.
2. '\r' at the end of a line is deleted.
Let's
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
We have code on the client side that removes \r from the log message
supplied by the user. (I don't really remember whether that is in 'svn' (the
cmdline client) or in libsvn_client.)
That would be the
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:14 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote:
We should probably link to the Coding Conventions section from the Patch
submission guidelines section just to be thorough.
Done in r1420516.
1 - 100 of 834 matches
Mail list logo
