skelta-mode with propfinds
1.7.x-neon1.7.x bulk-mode
But it makes sense: upgrading only one part (server or client) doesn't
change network protocol, which is good thing IMHO.
+1 from me.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Ivan Zhakov i...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:14 AM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net
wrote
the progress. I am not against either
option, just throwing some more ideas out there for consideration.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
it resolves different
conflicts in different ways, I would want a simple option like that in
the API too. I would not want to have to reimplement the same
decision logic as the CLI and then call a lower level API.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
Note that I am referring to options offered by the CLI user interface,
not the API. The API might expose more low-level operations as has been
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markp...@gmail.com]
Sent: vrijdag 15 februari 2013 15:23
To: Philip Martin; dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: move conflict resolution UI (was: Re: branch 1.8
, but in this case it
explains the scope of the operation :)
+1
This is what my expectations as a user would be as well.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
--disable-debug --enable-optimize \
--without-berkeley-db -without-serf CUSERFLAGS='-march=native'
Do we have, or will we have, a document or wiki that suggest
optimization flags for packagers?
Thanks for sharing. The results look nice.
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
this but I still had to enter 'p' or 'q' for every
conflict.
I assume this is a bug?
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com wrote:
Hey all,
Just to give you an update on what
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 06:02:40PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:50:51AM -0500, Mark Phippard wrote:
I just did a merge using current trunk. There were a lot of text and
tree conflicts. I
svn up or svn --version I am getting the 1.7.x version
instead. This does not always happen, but it is something that only
just started happening in the last few months. Since I usually only
need to run update, it is not that big of a deal so I have never spent
any time on it.
--
Thanks
Mark
, (m) merge,
(mc) mine-conflict, (tc) theirs-conflict, (s) show all options:
..etc ...
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
would still have to restart his server to even trigger
whatever code would do this sort of checking. I cannot envision any
usable proxy scenario that can be totally dynamic.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
of the master, that would be OK. It would just be a trade-off
that the person configuring the slave could decide to make.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
have ever synched with
trunk. So maybe it is trying to replay every revision from your
branch when I merge back and that is why it gets so many conflicts?
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Julian Foad
julianf...@btopenworld.com wrote:
Mark Phippard wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com wrote:
BTW, how are you managing your branch? I tried merging it back to
trunk to get an idea on the diff
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
That graph is wrong or at least misleading. There have been catch-up
merges, for example this one:
I don't yet know what's going wrong, but likely something to do with subtree
mergeinfo is causing the mergeinfo
the decision contingent upon the size of the deltified
and packed representation, all large data that benefits from these will
still be stored within the rev and pack files.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, the Branch Readme does imply he intends to work on some things that
might have an impact here.
I pasted the contents of the readme merely to point
-Alexander Thomas (AT)
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
not
already aware of?
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
files from the repository, a lot of
people use those options too. And those pretty much have to only update
the items you select. Some GUI users seem to live in that mode of
operating.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.comwrote:
Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 2:55 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net
wrote:
On 03/12/2013 02:14 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com
this up because it would be nice if JavaHL had some
API's we could call to tell us things like:
Is working copy mixed revision?
Are there any switched folders?
Etc. We implement these things ourselves today using status and other API.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Julian Foad julianf...@btopenworld.comwrote:
Mark Phippard wrote:
As an aside, even before SVN 1.7, I turned merge into a wizard that
included best practices checks. One of these was warning you if
working copy was mixed revisions. So SVN 1.7
if the externals are for a different repository.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
for
building mentions VC 6.0, but it also mentions later versions and I believe
the build process supports other versions.
We build it using VS 2010. Apache Lounge binaries are all done with newer
versions as well.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
).getPath(),
-false, true, false, false, null, null, null);
+false, true, false, false, false, null, null, null);
// Commit the changes, and check the state of the WC.
checkCommitRevision(thisTest,
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http
. */
1258 svn_wc_notify_move_broken
1259
Also in svn_wc_notify_state_t, this new one is missing:
1289 /** The source to copy the file from is missing. */
1290 svn_wc_notify_state_source_missing
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
I have never used the class, but the JavaHL CommitItemStateFlags are
missing values also.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
One of the areas that often falls thru the cracks with JavaHL is the
notifications. Looking at current HEAD, it looks pretty
/** UUID of the repository. Can be NULL meaning unknown.
1679* @since New in 1.8. */
1680 const char *repos_uuid;
1681
1682 /* @todo Add metadata about a local copy of the node, if and when
1683* we store one. */
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
with this behavior for the command line output, then I
am OK with it at the API layer. Thanks for the example though. I do
now have a better understanding of the question.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
a long list of API is hard sometime, but it is also
hard when you want to do something like merge everything in BranchX
and the interface requires passing a bunch of parameters that do not
directly apply.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
+1 to Release, signature committed.
Note that I did get one error during the HTTP tests. I have not signed
1.6.x since we started building 1.7. Getting build environment working
again for 1.6.x has been challenging and I am using a lot of old
dependencies. So if other signers are not seeing an
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Mark Phippard wrote on Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 13:10:54 -0400:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:15 PM, danie...@apache.org wrote:
+(danielsh adds: if we do this, would be nice to have 'svnadmin info'
command
+that prints
the behavior.
Sorry for the noise.
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
We are looking into a Subclipse problem. It seems that with 1.7.9
when we call the SVN status API with the equivalent of the -v option
we are no longer getting back ignored resources in the list
the debugger and have incremental
rebuilds etc. I think those are the kinds of docs that would be
needed.
TortoiseSVN build also uses a lot of the same concepts:
https://code.google.com/p/tortoisesvn/source/browse/trunk/build.txt
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
fix our data structure so that we are
storing both keys when they differ only by case, or we should do
nothing.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Julian Foad julianf...@btopenworld.com writes:
I am only questioning the assignment of a 1.8.0 release blocker
milestone
. Again, that is
just a bug. If you can fix it great. If you can't, I am not going to
lose sleep over it.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
was assuming LogDate was still used in
the callback. It turns out that we (Subclipse) are still using it in
the callback even though we use the new org.apache classes. So that
means we can fix this in Subclipse by not using this class anymore.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com writes:
I think Synchronized is a better solution, but will not object if you
want to make the change.
I'm a novice as far as Java is concerned, I don't know which style
On Apr 29, 2013, at 6:42 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
There is only one issue open against 1.8.0:
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4358
Based on what I understand I believe that issue can be moved to some
future target since the conclusion seems to be it's not a
be helpful to refer to this section of
our documentation when determining what can done to the 1.8.x branch
during our soak period:
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/releasing.html#release-stabilization
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
\Microsoft.CppCommon.ta
rgets(347,5): error MSB6003: The specified task executable CL.exe could not be
run. The process cannot access the file 'C:\SVN\deps-1.8.x\build\httpd\modules\
proxy\balancers\Release\cl.write.1.tlog' because it is being used by another pro
cess.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http
I have Update 2 installed.
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=38188
Sent from my iPad
On May 6, 2013, at 7:29 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
I like that the script can be re-run.
Yes, I tried
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
I have Update 2 installed.
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=38188
I've installed update 2, still get a completely finished build.
I
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
Can you look to see that there is a line like this in all the vcxproj
files under modules
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
I am attaching the log file it found. I also searched the
httxt2dbm.vcxproj file, which seems to be the relevant file, and it
does NOT seem to have
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
I am attaching the log file it found. I also searched the
httxt2dbm.vcxproj file
is not
found and the fs will not be built when I run this. Everything else
seems OK.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
where to look for
junit?
Do these settings do anything else? For example do they make building
__ALL_TESTS__ and build JavaHL and the JavaHL tests? Currently, I run
that build target separately.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:07 AM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net
wrote:
On 05/09/2013 07:04 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Can we get a periodic data dump of subversion.tigris.org/issues/ onto
ASF hardware
.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using a new build process and using VS 2012, so I am sure that is
the problem. But I am getting 49 test failures. I am attaching the
fails.log but I do not think it lends much ideas. I tried running
with --verbose
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using a new build process and using VS 2012, so I am sure that is
the problem. But I am getting 49 test failures. I am attaching
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
On 10.05.2013 18:22, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using a new build process
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
On 10.05.2013 18:47, Mark Phippard wrote:
FWIW, I do not agree with you on the syntax though. file:///foo Has
always worked on Windows to access C:\foo The drive letter was only
needed to access other drives.
Well
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using a new build process and using VS 2012, so I am sure that is
the problem. But I am getting 49 test failures. I am attaching the
fails.log but I
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using a new build process and using VS 2012, so I am sure that is
the problem
I am still getting those test failures in the svnrdump and svnsync
tests. Given that the tests work for others, I would guess this is
something odd about my machine setup. I manually did an svnsync to
confirm the binary worked.
In the svn:// and http:// tests I have a couple of additional
TESTED:
JavaHL
ra_local | ra_svn | ra_serf X fsfs
RESULTS:
All passed except svnsync + svnrdump as noted on dev@.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
Signature committed.
SUMMARY:
+1 to release
PLATFORM:
Windows 7
VS 2012 Update 2
Java 1.6
COMPONENTS:
Apache2.4.4
APR 1.4.6
APR-UTIL1.5.1
OpenSSL 1.0.1e
Serf
that were the same or similar
revision as the one that created the patch. And of course they also
could not have been applied with a generic patch program either.
One would need to reach through the archives for the summer and fall
of 2007 to find all the details.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http
+1 for release. I committed my signature.
Tested on Win7 with VS 2008.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
On May 30, 2013, at 5:23 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
As noted elsewhere, press releases are ideally on a Tuesday. I'd really like
to see the release/announce go out, coordinated, on a Tuesday.
That's fine the
and sha1
TESTED:
JavaHL
ra_local | ra_svn | ra_serf X fsfs
RESULTS:
All passed.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:59 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote:
On 06/17/2013 02:35 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:28 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net
wrote:
My testing seems to show that we do not appear to commit externals pulled
from a different
)
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Lieven Govaerts svn...@mobsol.be wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
I updated my Windows laptop to 1.8.0 final. I am trying to commit a
change for Subclipse to tigris.org and it is failing. The error
message
I won't be online for another hour or so. Could someone try committing to
Tigris using 1.8? Maybe all commits to that server fail?
Our subversion project has a repos. Just commit outside the www folder.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 18, 2013, at 7:11 AM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Lieven Govaerts svn...@mobsol.be wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
I updated my Windows laptop to 1.8.0 final. I am trying to commit a
change for Subclipse to tigris.org and it is failing. The error
message
coming in. I would prefer to see us do a normal 1.8.1
release roughly 10-14 days following our launch and include as many of
the early fixes as we can.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
On Jun 19, 2013, at 9:09 PM, jcor...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jcorvel
Date: Thu Jun 20 01:09:20 2013
New Revision: 1494829
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1494829
Log:
Add information about serf skelta mode and the configuration knobs involved
to the 1.8 release notes.
Patch by: lgo
have
a directive they can use to mitigate it.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
authentication via Windows.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
to create a mini-dump of the process while this dialog is
displayed.
Is anyone getting this error when checking out from a publicly
accessible repository? That would make it easier for others to
replicate and debug.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
week.
That sounds great. If Serf prefers negotiate over NTLM that sounds
fine to me. But if the server is only offering NTLM it ought to work
if it is possible.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
the log trail to show every file in their repository that was
read and did not care about the performance hit.
I could be wrong, but that is how I remember this.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
line client should have always included
externals by default. I guess we cannot do that now, so having an option
is good. I kind of agree with Bert that I do not like the idea of making
it configurable.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:09 AM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.netwrote:
On 11/04/2011 08:36 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
I can comment from a GUI tool perspective. In Subclipse, we have always
had
this feature.
[...]
FWIW, I think that the command line client should have always
BranchA to BranchC in the
above scenario. SVN does not have any limits on where you can merge from
and to.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
not support these
scenarios. Even in the cyclic merge scenario Subversion is not preventing
you from doing a merge, it is simply not doing it as well as one could hope
it would and leads to conflicts that you should not have to resolve.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
needs to support some resolutions like
that, which I guess would just be an option to mark the conflict resolved
but do nothing.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
should be looking at better ways to interact with that format so
we can benefit from tools created around it?
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
working copies a folder will not be at HEAD after a
commit from its children until you run update.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
; supported by
It might just be a copy and paste oversight, but all of the links on
this page you are linking to says the license is GPL. That is true
for TortoiseSVN, but shouldn't the license for all of the plain
Subversion packages be listed as Apache 2.0?
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http
it in front of your customers so that they can download
clients easily. That seems like it should be good enough to serve
your customers well.
This is of course just my opinion but I am -0 on accepting this for
the reasons stated.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
created a fork. That is your
option to do that. But otherwise there are plenty of Subversion
clients out there that seem to do just fine without adding links on
our download page.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
and only
place to talk about it.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
Hyrum
I think you posted the previous JavaDoc. Can you update the
documentation on our web site so that the JavaDoc for 1.7 is
available?
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
of 50 ones, so it was shortened to the summary.]
--
uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
http://www.uberSVN.com/
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
Done
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
/me wonders how we haven't noticed it so far...
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
-ReleaseLongArrayElements(jrevs, jrevArray, 0);
return jrevs;
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
(AbstractJhlClientAdapter.java:1113)
I will keep looking, but the error seems like it is happening in the
native code.
I will also point out that this has NOT come up a lot and I do not
know how to reproduce it.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com writes:
We have had a few users report a weird error that looks like they are
getting an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException except that it appears that
it is coming out of the native
201 - 300 of 828 matches
Mail list logo
