Re: svn commit: r1467266 - /subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html

2013-04-12 Thread Ben Reser
I tend to think the absolute URL syntax is better for our documentation since the only way the relative URL works is if you run it while your CWD is in a working copy in that repo. On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:32 AM, danie...@apache.org wrote: Author: danielsh Date: Fri Apr 12 13:32:31 2013 New

Re: svn commit: r1467266 - /subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html

2013-04-12 Thread Philip Martin
One absolute URL is enough, the other can be relative. Ben Reser b...@reser.org writes: I tend to think the absolute URL syntax is better for our documentation since the only way the relative URL works is if you run it while your CWD is in a working copy in that repo. On Fri, Apr 12, 2013

Re: svn commit: r1467266 - /subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html

2013-04-12 Thread Daniel Shahaf
I was optimising for readability, not portability. On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 07:46:14AM -0700, Ben Reser wrote: I tend to think the absolute URL syntax is better for our documentation since the only way the relative URL works is if you run it while your CWD is in a working copy in that repo.