On 05-04 21:50, Bryan Bennett wrote:
Why not just use the built in transparency of the terminal?
st lacks this.
--
ilf
Über 80 Millionen Deutsche benutzen keine Konsole. Klick dich nicht weg!
-- Eine Initiative des Bundesamtes für Tastaturbenutzung
signature.asc
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 22:58:33 -0500, Hank D hdon...@gmail.com wrote:
[...] but I really want an email client that isn't total ass.
You may find what you're looking for in notmuch [1].
Even if you do somehow come to the conclusion that it's total ass,
the amount of ass would still be notmuch.
That's a feature.
On May 5, 2011 3:39 AM, ilf i...@zeromail.org wrote:
On 05-04 21:50, Bryan Bennett wrote:
Why not just use the built in transparency of the terminal?
st lacks this.
--
ilf
Über 80 Millionen Deutsche benutzen keine Konsole. Klick dich nicht weg!
-- Eine Initiative des
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Maciej Sobkowski macie...@maciejjo.pl wrote:
I want to add transparency to terminal windows using transset-df. Is
this possible to acomplish within config.h file?
Try instead getting a fucking life.
uriel
Thanks for your patch. I applied it for testing purposes. If anyone
spots an issue, please let me know.
FYI: I tested it and it works great :)
Also making a floating mplayer fullscreen, switch to a tag then go
back and make mplayer restore from fullscreen works as expected now.
Good work!
Hey,
On 5 May 2011 14:23, Uriel ur...@berlinblue.org wrote:
I want to add transparency to terminal windows using transset-df. Is
this possible to acomplish within config.h file?
Try instead getting a fucking life.
Transparency does have some pragmatic benefit: in monocle mode
transparent
On 5/5/11, Connor Lane Smith c...@lubutu.com wrote:
Transparency does have some pragmatic benefit: in monocle mode
transparent terminals would allow you to keep an eye on the output of
several, layered upon one another.
This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard.
Besides, there's no reason
On 5 May 2011 16:36, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
Never mind; THIS is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Reality
(putting aside the idiotic implication that my computer monitor isn't
real) also has AIDS and war. Maybe we should patch those into our
window managers too?
This is
Never mind; THIS is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Reality
(putting aside the idiotic implication that my computer monitor isn't
real) also has AIDS and war. Maybe we should patch those into our
window managers too? Then we could put dwm in monocle mode and keep an
eye on layered AIDS
Uriel ur...@berlinblue.org writes:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Christian Neukirchen
chneukirc...@gmail.com wrote:
Uriel ur...@berlinblue.org writes:
Please, replace gawk with a sane version of awk, like the one included
with 9base.
The awk in 9base is a hacked up version of bwk's
5 May 2011 17:50 Connor Lane Smith c...@lubutu.com wrote:
On 5 May 2011 16:36, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
Never mind; THIS is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Reality
(putting aside the idiotic implication that my computer monitor isn't
real) also has AIDS and war. Maybe
Ignoring the trolls posting here - the solution is obvious. Use a
different terminal or apply the patch if it means that much to you.
st won't get transparency (most likely), and transset is a poor
solution anyway, as it makes both the text and the window
background equally transparent. Use one
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Bryan Bennett bbenn...@gmail.com wrote:
Ignoring the trolls posting here - the solution is obvious. Use a
different terminal or apply the patch if it means that much to you.
st won't get transparency (most likely), and transset is a poor
solution anyway, as it
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Connor Lane Smith c...@lubutu.com wrote:
Besides, there's no reason for transparency to be considered a bell or
whistle: alpha is just a fourth dimension alongside RGB. Reality has
transparency, did you notice?
Reality also has cancer and depression, so should
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Maciej Sobkowski macie...@maciejjo.pl wrote:
Didn't expected such a comotion becaouse of this.
Ignore Uriel; he does not post useful information.
--Andrew Hills
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Connor Lane Smith c...@lubutu.com wrote:
This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. The comparison makes total
sense, of course, because transparency clearly kills people. How
fucking fallacious.
*Reality* kills people. Therefore it's clearly not a bell or
You know what's great? freedom of choice. You know what sucks? People
telling you what you're allowed to do with the software you use. Is
this suckmore or suckless?
While I have no love for transparency given that the majority of
transparency features in desktop environments are superfluous and
hilarious argument about transparency that somehow
derived to AIDS
I love this mailing list.
Leon Winter made a patch to support transparency in st few months ago
[1]. It should'nt be hard to adapt it to tip if you want it.
1: http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1009/6046.html
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Al Gest himse...@gmail.com wrote:
You know what's great? freedom of choice. You know what sucks? People
telling you what you're allowed to do with the software you use. Is
this suckmore or suckless?
I'm not telling anyone what they're allowed to do. I'm telling
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
People who want transparent terminals are incapable of learning anyway.
Why do you even bother communicating?
--Andrew Hills
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Andrew Hills hills...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do you even bother communicating?
Because for every one of you there are ten who listen
--
# Kurt H Maier
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
People who want transparent terminals are incapable of learning anyway.
Do you have any evidence to back up this claim?
Because for every one of you there are ten who listen
And 10x more who groan at the immature, rude,
On Thu, 5 May 2011 16:55:27 -0400, Kurt H Maier wrote:
Because for every one of you there are ten who listen
and lough
-flo
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Robert Whitcomb rwhitc...@acm.org wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
People who want transparent terminals are incapable of learning anyway.
Do you have any evidence to back up this claim?
Because for every one of you
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Al Gest himse...@gmail.com wrote:
You know what's great? freedom of choice. You know what sucks? People
telling you what you're allowed to do with the software you use. Is
this suckmore or suckless?
Yes, please exercise your freedom of choice and go fucking use
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:27 PM, ilf i...@zeromail.org wrote:
On 05-05 22:04, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
Leon Winter made a patch to support transparency in st few months ago [1].
It should'nt be hard to adapt it to tip if you want it. 1:
http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1009/6046.html
Cool!
Any
Can we please add to the patch a feature that rm -rf /'s the disk of
anyone who runs it?
How is this a good idea?
It is for purely *stupidity* reasons.
What are you basing this on? Can you back up your statement?
Just fucking smell it!
On Thursday, May 05, 2011 03:05:03 PM Uriel wrote:
We all have had totally retarded ideas, it is only thanks in part to
people that went out of their way to point out how retarded many of my
ideas were that I learned and now I know better.
I'd like to go out of my way to point out how fucking
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:02 PM, errno er...@cox.net wrote:
Listen to _what_ exactly? There's nothing to listen too, it's just
substanceless vitriol. Your assholeism is naught but the equivalent
of a social blunt-instrument; applying a blunt instrument in lieu of
reasoned discourse is
On 5 May 2011 21:12, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not telling anyone what they're allowed to do. I'm telling them
what they're doing is stupid shit, and that founding principle of
suckless is basically sound.
Who's likely to behave more intelligently, a person who experiments
On Thursday, May 05, 2011 05:52:53 PM Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:02 PM, errno er...@cox.net wrote:
Listen to _what_ exactly? There's nothing to listen too, it's just
substanceless vitriol. Your assholeism is naught but the equivalent
of a social blunt-instrument;
This is the best discussion that has been had here in a while. :3
Wmii is the best choice, hands down.
The other WMs assume way too much. I like dwm second best.
Here's the plusses:
1) Wmii does tagging /right/. Want to have your editor, browser and
terminal in a dev
tag? Done. Want to have your editor in your debug tag as well? No
problem. You decide
On Thursday, May 05, 2011 06:12:09 PM Jacob Todd wrote:
This is the best discussion that has been had here in a while. :3
grin
No doubt - I'm actually having fun. It's amazing just how easy
it is to be a total flagrant asshole to someone remotely over
the internet.
It's too bad Kurt can
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Al Gest himse...@gmail.com wrote:
Who's likely to behave more intelligently, a person who experiments
and finds out what works and doesn't work for themselves and
understands from experience why things work or don't work, or a person
who religiously follows the
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
Transparent terminals unnecessarily increase computational power
required to render simple text. They make a fundamental application
harder for a computer to run. This makes the core program less
portable by raising the
Transparent terminals unnecessarily increase computational power
required to render simple text. They make a fundamental application
harder for a computer to run. This makes the core program less
portable by raising the hardware requirements. The only gain is
(arguably) aesthetic. This,
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:20 PM, m...@factoryprime.net wrote:
So... Houses simply shelter us from weather. Automobiles simply transport
us from point A to point B. Should we only live is sod huts? Should we
only drive wooden go-carts? Of course, anything else is just a waste of
resources,
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:20 PM, errno er...@cox.net wrote:
No doubt - I'm actually having fun. It's amazing just how easy
it is to be a total flagrant asshole to someone remotely over
the internet.
It's too bad Kurt can dish it out but can't take it; it appears I hurt
his feelings. I
I build large-scale compute clusters. I build massive storage networks.
I am
familiar with the sorts of things people are doing with large amounts
of processing power.
I am an intergalactic species from the planet insert stupid name here.
Your super-clusters and storage clusters pale in
On Thursday, May 05, 2011 06:46:00 PM Kurt H Maier wrote:
Transparent terminals unnecessarily increase computational power
required to render simple text. They make a fundamental application
harder for a computer to run. This makes the core program less
portable by raising the hardware
On Thursday, May 05, 2011 07:28:56 PM Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:20 PM, errno er...@cox.net wrote:
No doubt - I'm actually having fun. It's amazing just how easy
it is to be a total flagrant asshole to someone remotely over
the internet.
It's too bad Kurt can dish it
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:39 PM, m...@factoryprime.net wrote:
I am an intergalactic species from the planet insert stupid name here.
Your super-clusters and storage clusters pale in comparison to my insert
ridiculious banter here
If you're too stupid to use google to verify my credentials --
On 6 May 2011 02:46, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Al Gest himse...@gmail.com wrote:
Who's likely to behave more intelligently, a person who experiments
and finds out what works and doesn't work for themselves and
understands from experience why things
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Al Gest himse...@gmail.com wrote:
Evasive answer.
The question did not warrant more.
That doesn't provide any substance or merit to your belligerence.
Vitriol has also been seethed many times in the past on this very
list. You seem perfectly happy to provide
On 6 May 2011 04:49, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
The question did not warrant more.
It clearly did, the problem is the question was fairly loaded, and
answering the question honestly would have contradicted your position.
That doesn't provide any substance or merit to your
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Al Gest himse...@gmail.com wrote:
It clearly did, the problem is the question was fairly loaded, and
answering the question honestly would have contradicted your position.
No, you tremendous ass. The question was framed to insult me if I'd
answered it. It's
On 6 May 2011 05:06, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
It's also irrelevant, because nobody is 'experiementing'
here. There are other routes for 'experimentation.'
Let me direct your attention to the original poster.
I'm not interested in how you think I come across. Fortunately,
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:20 AM, m...@factoryprime.net wrote:
Transparent terminals unnecessarily increase computational power
required to render simple text. They make a fundamental application
harder for a computer to run. This makes the core program less
portable by raising the hardware
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Al Gest himse...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not interested in how you think I come across. Fortunately,
idiots like you don't control my speech.
And yet you are clearly perturbed by it.
It is disturbing that there are human beings inept and retarded enough
to think
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Anders Andersson pipat...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd also like to compare that kind of retardness to people that have
lights *inside* their computer, complete with a window on the side of
the tower. Totally useless, wasting power, pollutes the vision by
shining
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:48 AM, errno er...@cox.net wrote:
I could of course make some really opinionated and abrasive statements
about people like you who choose to continue to use hardware terminal
emulators in lieu of, say, 9term - but that'd be uncool.
I hate hardware-emulation-terminals
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:17 AM, m...@factoryprime.net wrote:
People who want transparent terminals are incapable of learning anyway.
I'm curious, how did you come to this conclusion?
There is plenty of empirical evidence to back this up, just look at
this lists archives.
uriel
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Al Gest himse...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 May 2011 21:12, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not telling anyone what they're allowed to do. I'm telling them
what they're doing is stupid shit, and that founding principle of
suckless is basically sound.
After 53 messages in this thread, gmail just flagged it as spam.
Would that be a feature? ;)
Jase
On 6 May 2011 06:29, Uriel ur...@berlinblue.org wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:17 AM, m...@factoryprime.net wrote:
People who want transparent termin...
There is plenty of empirical evidence
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Eitan Goldshtrom
thesource...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I suggest you start by not sending HTML email to mailing lists.
Thank you
uriel
P.S.: Can we please get a filter that bounces all HTML-containing
emails with a message instructing people to learn to
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Eitan Goldshtrom
thesource...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
So I started using wmii a couple months ago. It was the first time I wasn't
using GNOME and it's default stuff and I did so because a friend recommended
wmii to me. So now I want to know what you all
58 matches
Mail list logo
