Suraj N. Kurapati sun...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu 24 Nov 2011 05:12:17 PM PST, Stephen Paul Weber wrote:
Somebody signing messages as Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
the ability to open new programs in the currently focused client's
workdir. https://github.com/sunaku/.dwm/compare/tip...spawn_cwd
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 09:54:44AM +0100, Troels Henriksen wrote:
Suraj N. Kurapati sun...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu 24 Nov 2011 05:12:17 PM PST, Stephen Paul Weber wrote:
Somebody signing messages as Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
the ability to open new programs in the currently focused
Kurt Van Dijck kurt.van.di...@eia.be writes:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 09:54:44AM +0100, Troels Henriksen wrote:
Suraj N. Kurapati sun...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu 24 Nov 2011 05:12:17 PM PST, Stephen Paul Weber wrote:
Somebody signing messages as Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
the ability to
Troels Henriksen a écrit :
Alternative/additional idea: look for the process indicated by the
_NET_WM_PID property, then use the working directory of that process.
It seems the value of _NET_WM_PID is not always useful:
For urxvtc clients, it is equal to the pid of urxvtd.
--
Bastien
On Fri 25 Nov 2011 01:00:58 PM PST, Bastien Dejean wrote:
Troels Henriksen a écrit :
look for the process indicated by the _NET_WM_PID property, then
use the working directory of that process.
It seems the value of _NET_WM_PID is not always useful: For urxvtc
clients, it is equal to the
On Fri 25 Nov 2011 10:11:35 AM PST, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
the ability to open new programs in the currently focused
client's workdir.
https://github.com/sunaku/.dwm/compare/tip...spawn_cwd
I don't understand the feature.
It's all about spatial locality. When I'm
On 25 November 2011 20:39, Suraj N. Kurapati sun...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, and that's good enough for me. However, in the case that the
remote client's title contains a path that also exists on the local
machine (perhaps network mounted on both local remote machines)
then your newly launched
On Sun 30 Oct 2011 08:53:48 AM PDT, Martin Kopta wrote:
4) Should be the code made smaller by witty constructions or do you
prefer boring and obvious constructions (which are generaly longer)?
Following this train of thought, what does the suckless community have
to say about sanity checks via
It's all about spatial locality. When I'm editing some code in Vim,
I like to launch some new terminals (or file managers) in the same
working directory as the file I'm editing to do additional things.
Ever tried :!your_terminal in vim? Maybe that's good enough for you if
bound to some key.
On Fri 25 Nov 2011 10:42:31 PM PST, Julian Dammann wrote:
It's all about spatial locality. When I'm editing some code in Vim,
I like to launch some new terminals (or file managers) in the same
working directory as the file I'm editing to do additional things.
Ever tried :!your_terminal
On Thu 24 Nov 2011 02:57:13 PM PST, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
On Thu 24 Nov 2011 01:58:05 PM PST, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
So I ported this feature to DWM using just 27 SLOC in this[2] patch,
[2]: https://github.com/sunaku/.dwm/compare/tip...spawn_cwd
It is now 29 SLOC after using DWM
On 2011-11-25 22:42, Julian Dammann wrote:
It's all about spatial locality.
Ever tried :!your_terminal in vim? Maybe that's good enough for you if
bound to some key.
autocmd BufEnter * cd %:p:h
for when you use multiple buffers in vim.
On Sat 26 Nov 2011 08:28:26 AM PST, Patrick Haller wrote:
autocmd BufEnter * cd %:p:h
for when you use multiple buffers in vim.
set autochdir
--
Bus error -- please leave by the rear door.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
13 matches
Mail list logo
