[2011-11-21 10:12] Rob robpill...@gmail.com
On 21 November 2011 09:15, Yoshi Rokuko yo...@rokuko.net wrote:
it seems that i cannot communicate my point - why are vi-styled-key-
binding-styled-interfaces so popular?
It's not vi-style, it's Unix. If you come from a Windows background, you'll
+--- Connor Lane Smith ---+
On 20/11/2011, Bjartur Thorlacius svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
pathnames often contain dots - and IRIs even more so.
Reserving the dot is not an option IMHO.
Would you ever use character sets or classes in dmenu?
I most
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:59:49 +0100
Yoshi Rokuko yo...@rokuko.net wrote:
+--- Dieter Plaetinck ---+
I don't understand... Are you saying I agree the
token matching works fine and is the fastest, but I
still want you to implement an inferior and more
On 21 November 2011 09:15, Yoshi Rokuko yo...@rokuko.net wrote:
it seems that i cannot communicate my point - why are vi-styled-key-
binding-styled-interfaces so popular?
It's not vi-style, it's Unix. If you come from a Windows background, you'll
be used to Ctrl+Backspace to delete a word, or
+-- Rob ---+
On 21 November 2011 09:15, Yoshi Rokuko yo...@rokuko.net wrote:
it seems that i cannot communicate my point - why are vi-styled-key-
binding-styled-interfaces so popular?
It's not vi-style, it's Unix. If you come from
Hi,
Why aren't all the available keyboard bindings documented in the manual?
I don't see any word movement bindings.
I discovered, by accident, that the following input 'foo bar' is
interpreted as the following regex: '.*foo.*bar.*', that's very nice but
I'm not sure that it is mentioned in the
Hey,
On 20 November 2011 14:29, Bastien Dejean nihilh...@gmail.com wrote:
Why aren't all the available keyboard bindings documented in the manual?
A lot of them are just standard line editing controls. I don't see any
worth in explaining for the umpteenth time what C-h and C-w do...
I don't
+- Bastien Dejean ---+
I discovered, by accident, that the following input 'foo bar' is
interpreted as the following regex: '.*foo.*bar.*', that's very nice but
if this is true, i use v4.3.1 without this, i would say that this
is not nice
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 14:43:59 +0100
Yoshi Rokuko yo...@rokuko.net wrote:
i think we all expect dmenu to match patterns as grep (?)
nope.
On 20 November 2011 14:43, Yoshi Rokuko yo...@rokuko.net wrote:
if this is true, i use v4.3.1 without this, i would say that this
is not nice because of the very same reason you used the word accident.
I would invite you to try it first. We use unstable sorting just like
before, which means ba
+ Connor Lane Smith ---+
I would invite you to try it first. We use unstable sorting just like
before, which means ba an will match banana before anbana, and
it is very rare that you intend to actually match whitespace. (I've
never needed to,
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 19:28:14 -, Yoshi Rokuko yo...@rokuko.net wrote:
i use dmenu only on url and program names, i used it for file names too,
but my files do not have whitespaces, and i agree that typing 'hg ta'
is much faster then 'hg.*ta', but i think one should not touch REGEXP(7)
in a
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:28:14 +0100
Yoshi Rokuko yo...@rokuko.net wrote:
i use dmenu only on url and program names, i used it for file names too,
but my files do not have whitespaces, and i agree that typing 'hg ta'
is much faster then 'hg.*ta', but i think one should not touch REGEXP(7)
in a
13 matches
Mail list logo
