On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:26 AM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dillo is not really designed to be ported to use other toolkits
Well, that's one more point for dillo then...
To be tied up to a C++ toolkit is not a plus.
uriel
On 5/12/11, Ethan Grammatikidis eeke...@fastmail.fm wrote:
A bit late but I thought it worth mentioning you don't even have to
install Opera 11, just untar it and run in situ. I wrote a little
script to cd to the highest-versioned dir matching ~/apps/opera-* and
run the included script. I much
On 6 May 2011, at 3:50 pm, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:47 AM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
Because it's linked in or because it doesn't use it?
Because most of it is compiled statically and the bits that are not
are shipped in the tarball and installed in-tree.
A
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Yoshi Rokuko yo...@rokuko.net wrote:
+ hiro ---+
About dillo again: last time I talked about fltk everyone here wanted
to kill me and I had to change my phone number. Is this just because
of C++ or are
Dillo is not really designed to be ported to use other toolkits
Well, that's one more point for dillo then...
Too bad most of the web requires javasuck these days,
I don't think we use the same web then...
+ hiro ---+
About dillo again: last time I talked about fltk everyone here wanted
to kill me and I had to change my phone number. Is this just because
of C++ or are there other reasons I've overseen?
i really like dillo because it
i really like dillo because it is fast, but i would really like to
control it like surf ...
so i would propose to use neither fltk nor gtk for a dillo gui.
Agree. However, I think you still need some kind of widget
madnes for html forms.
Too bad most of the web requires javasuck these days,
I would love to see a simple and fast image uncompressing library with a
standard API for all them. if we just add support for compressing we can
write simple tools to convert between file formats and change background
images or write a nicer slock.
and im sure jpg+png+gif can fit in less
That would be cool in my opinion, since I'm attraced to the concep of Abaco
(and Acme). The only reason I don't regularly use Abaco is that it renders
pages so poorly that it's much saner to use e.g. Surf.
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Jens Staal staal1...@gmail.com wrote:
For a web browser I
On Wed, 4 May 2011 21:30:28 +0200, Uriel wrote:
In any case, Go's own DNS resolver is still there, and for example on
ARM by default it still bypasses the libc for everything.
Not for long.
http://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=1166
--
Pierre 'catwell' Chapuis
The very monolithic busybox doesn't seem to fit with the rest in my
view. Couldn't you possibly use stuff from 9base for this?
May 2011 15:59 hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
For everything else on x86 you can use an old static opera (newer also
want qt iirc).
Nope. While quite big and and packed with features, new Opera can
use plain X, and does not force cups, gtk, qt, dbus, hal etc
Because it's linked in or because it doesn't use it?
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote:
May 2011 15:59 hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
For everything else on x86 you can use an old static opera (newer also
want qt iirc).
Nope. While quite big and and
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:47 AM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
Because it's linked in or because it doesn't use it?
Because most of it is compiled statically and the bits that are not
are shipped in the tarball and installed in-tree.
--
# Kurt H Maier
new opera have its own widget library. but its closed source. which sucks.
On 05/06/11 16:46, Jakub Lach wrote:
May 2011 15:59 hiro23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
For everything else on x86 you can use an old static opera (newer also
want qt iirc).
Nope. While quite big and and packed with
Of course it sucks, but everything sucks less than webkit.
About dillo again: last time I talked about fltk everyone here wanted
to kill me and I had to change my phone number. Is this just because
of C++ or are there other reasons I've overseen?
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:04 AM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
Of course it sucks, but everything sucks less than webkit.
About dillo again: last time I talked about fltk everyone here wanted
to kill me and I had to change my phone number. Is this just because
of C++ or are there other
Someone without any knowledge of C or English will actually pick me up
with a small bus in a few hours. Must be coincidence I guess.
I'm asking because some of the core developers have been asking on
their mailing list what other fast and light toolkit to use. You know
I don't want to start a
On 05-06 17:04, hiro wrote:
last time I talked about fltk everyone here wanted to kill me and I
had to change my phone number.
WTF.
--
ilf
Über 80 Millionen Deutsche benutzen keine Konsole. Klick dich nicht weg!
-- Eine Initiative des Bundesamtes für Tastaturbenutzung
On 6 May 2011 17:13, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:04 AM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
Of course it sucks, but everything sucks less than webkit.
About dillo again: last time I talked about fltk everyone here wanted
to kill me and I had to change my
Is the distance to the sun affecting in some way the mind of people in this
mailing list?
On 06/05/2011, at 20:33, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 May 2011 17:13, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:04 AM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
Of course
Spot on, it's because of the Retinol. Sun rays are coming through the
planks more frequently these days :)
For a web browser I would recommend NetSurf, not to be confused with
surf (which is a shameful disgrace for the suckless project).
Not to re-ignite the (very) volatile feelings on this list lately, but
I just happened to stumble on a *nix port of abaco
(http://lab-fgb.com/abaco/). Considering
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Christian Neukirchen
chneukirc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
this is the third public release of sabotage, a distribution based on
musl and busybox. Provided software is:
This is a mildly interesting project that might have some potential.
Please, replace gawk
Netsurf brings in libxml.On May 4, 2011 9:01 AM, Uriel ur...@berlinblue.org wrote: On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Christian Neukirchen
chneukirc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
this is the third public release of sabotage, a distribution based on
musl and busybox. Provided software is:
This is a
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 09:30:49AM -0400, Kurt H Maier wrote:
Netsurf brings in libxml.brbrspan style=font-family:Prelude, Verdana,
san-serif;brbr/spanspan id=signaturediv id=no_signature
style=overflow:hidden;/div/spanspan style=color:navy;
font-family:Prelude, Verdana, san-serif; hr
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Nick White n...@njw.me.uk wrote:
I enjoyed the irony of this email.
If there existed a patch for the webos email client to not do that
shit, I would apply *so fast*
And seriously, compare the code of netsurf and webkit-gtk
sometime.
I don't understand why
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 09:43:28AM -0400, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Nick White n...@njw.me.uk wrote:
And seriously, compare the code of netsurf and webkit-gtk
sometime.
I don't understand why netsurf seems to require libxml at runtime.
I didn't know it did. Are
On May 4, 2011 9:01 AM, Uriel ur...@berlinblue.org wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Christian Neukirchen
chneukirc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
this is the third public release of sabotage, a distribution based on
musl and busybox. Provided software is:
This is a mildly interesting
Didnt knew netsurf. it looks fast. but...
1) keyboard support sucks (no way to change between tabs, and no way to
switch between text fields, links, ... with tab)
2) dependencies:
Depends On : libmng librsvg curl libglade lcms libjpeg=7
libwapcaplet libcss
I don't get the point
One thing you should know about netsurf is that there are
a few different frontends which work on linux. You're
looking at the GTK one, which is naturally heavier on
dependencies. The other major one is a 'framebuffer'
frontend, which is a generic api which can hook into x or
directfb.
I think
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Nick suckless-...@njw.me.uk wrote:
I didn't know it did. Are you using a newish build?
Using the packages for openbsd.
The framebuffer port doesn't look that wierd. I still dream
of writing a surf interface using netsurf's parsers
libraries,
On 05/04/11 16:31, Nick wrote:
One thing you should know about netsurf is that there are
a few different frontends which work on linux. You're
looking at the GTK one, which is naturally heavier on
dependencies. The other major one is a 'framebuffer'
frontend, which is a generic api which can
On 4 May 2011, at 4:27 pm, pancake wrote:
i dont see the point of using libglade for the gtk backend... it's
just the reason why it depends on libxml and this is probably the
main bottleneck for loading the gtk UI...
gtk is the main bottleneck for loading the gtk ui. it became an
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 05:27:26PM +0200, pancake wrote:
On 05/04/11 16:31, Nick wrote:
i dont see the point of using libglade for the gtk backend... it's
just the reason why it depends on libxml and this is probably the
main bottleneck for loading the gtk UI...
I think their RISC OS frontend
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
Netsurf brings in libxml.
A web browser brings an xml parser?!? No shit!
uriel
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Corey Thomasson cthom.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Not quite. A few commits ago the net package was changed to use libc in
places and dynamically link unfortunately
Blame Apple that breaks any code that doesn't do networking via their
luserspace crap.
In any case,
On 5/4/11, Nick suckless-...@njw.me.uk wrote:
4) possibility to filter or ban ads? (custom js fun? custom css stuff?)
I use privoxy for this; browser independant and generally a
local proxy seems like the right place to do this sort of
stuff.
Putting this into the HTTP implementation, or in a
I would love to see gcc, clang, tcc or Go.. Else i dont see the point of
distributing make, patch, git and similar.
An arm port would be great.
Good job. It looks promising.
On 01/05/2011, at 0:29, Christian Neukirchen chneukirc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
this is the third public release of
On Wed, 4 May 2011 01:32:30 +0200
pancake panc...@youterm.com wrote:
I would love to see gcc, clang, tcc or Go.. Else i dont see the point of
distributing make, patch, git and similar.
file-5.05 flex-2.5.35 gawk-3.1.8 gcc-core-4.5.3 git-1.7.4 gmp-5.0.1
41 matches
Mail list logo
