Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-05-07 Thread hiro
complicated? is the most simple implementation for storing data. why non transparent? I'm not sure I understood the whole concept yet, will have to do some more reading. I guess I'm making it more difficult than it is...

Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-05-06 Thread hiro
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:38 PM, pancake panc...@youterm.com wrote: You may like starting to play with sdb. http://hg.youterm.com/sdb Its a nosql-like (key-value db) based on cdb, but with a decent api and aiming to provide a memcache network protocol. Its about 1000 LOC atm. Contribs are

Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-05-06 Thread pancake
On 05/06/11 16:28, hiro wrote: On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:38 PM, pancakepanc...@youterm.com wrote: You may like starting to play with sdb. http://hg.youterm.com/sdb Its a nosql-like (key-value db) based on cdb, but with a decent api and aiming to provide a memcache network protocol. Its about

Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-05-05 Thread Pieter Praet
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 22:58:33 -0500, Hank D hdon...@gmail.com wrote: [...] but I really want an email client that isn't total ass. You may find what you're looking for in notmuch [1]. Even if you do somehow come to the conclusion that it's total ass, the amount of ass would still be notmuch.

Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-05-04 Thread Uriel
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:49 AM, SHRIZZA shri...@gmail.com wrote: You know, we could all say we're using shitty MUAs because we see the rendered HTML rather than the plain-text component. ;) Even HTML-only mail can be converted to plain text. Solution: use mutt. Real solution: Exterminate

Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-05-04 Thread Ricardo Catalinas Jiménez
Despite Mutt does a good job for me, today I tried Heirloom mailx[1] and I'm hooked to its simplicity. [1] http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/mailx.html -- Ricardo

Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-05-03 Thread hiro
Gmail's basic html view sucks least at least for a lazy ass like me. I'm still waiting for the plan9 cloud 2.0 alternative though. mail.google.com/mail/h/ 2011/4/9 Łukasz Pankowski lukp...@o2.pl: Bjartur Thorlacius svartma...@gmail.com writes: On 4/6/11, Hank D hdon...@gmail.com wrote: The

Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-04-09 Thread Bjartur Thorlacius
On 4/6/11, Hank D hdon...@gmail.com wrote: The problem is that mutt sucks, too. True. It can be configured to suck even less, though. But I want a minimalist alternative that's configured to suck less *at build time*. If the default for a text-based MUA is not to just display text,

Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-04-09 Thread Łukasz Pankowski
Bjartur Thorlacius svartma...@gmail.com writes: On 4/6/11, Hank D hdon...@gmail.com wrote: The problem is that mutt sucks, too. True. It can be configured to suck even less, though. But I want a minimalist alternative that's configured to suck less *at build time*. If the default for a

Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-04-06 Thread Hank D
The problem is that mutt sucks, too. If the default for a text-based MUA is not to just display text, something's awry. Not to mention the very outdated model of email it uses and the lack of support for multiple email accounts. Actually, I shouldn't say that. There's at least 3 different ways

Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-04-05 Thread Hank D
I'll look at the source. I don't think I'll be able to accomplish much, but I really want an email client that isn't total ass. On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis eeke...@fastmail.fm wrote: On 3 Apr 2011, at 1:37 pm, Džen wrote: I don't know what you guys think, but why not

Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-04-05 Thread SHRIZZA
You know, we could all say we're using shitty MUAs because we see the rendered HTML rather than the plain-text component. ;) Even HTML-only mail can be converted to plain text. Solution: use mutt. In ~/.muttrc: alternative_order text/plain auto_view text/html set

Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-04-03 Thread Džen
I don't know what you guys think, but why not simply return messages which contain a text/html attachment to the sender? Maybe like this people might learn it someday and trash such shitty MUAs... On 01/04/11 02:09am, hiro wrote: I just looked at the source and what is this shit?!?!

Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-04-03 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On 3 Apr 2011, at 1:37 pm, Džen wrote: I don't know what you guys think, but why not simply return messages which contain a text/html attachment to the sender? Maybe like this people might learn it someday and trash such shitty MUAs... I think some mailing lists do this. Some simply drop all

Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-04-01 Thread pancake
On 04/01/11 01:22, Andreas Wagner wrote: Thanks for the information on the repository url change. I have updated the archlinux AUR PKGBUILD: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39955 cool! I use the one in slpm :) slpm -i dmc # hg clone http://hg.suckless.org/slpm I use dmc to quickly

Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-03-31 Thread Andreas Wagner
Thanks for the information on the repository url change. I have updated the archlinux AUR PKGBUILD: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39955 I use dmc to quickly send files by email from the shell and I'm interested in working on dmc because I would like it to be usable as my primary email

Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-03-31 Thread hiro
Fuck such enormous letters at such a time, is it possible to turn off HTML in gmail?? Or better even - make *your* mail client suck less... On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 6:10 PM, pancake panc...@youterm.com wrote: As long as they are suckless projects and I didnt find any time to work more on it im

Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-03-31 Thread hiro
I just looked at the source and what is this shit?!?!

Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-03-31 Thread Benjamin R. Haskell
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, hiro wrote: I just looked at the source and what is this shit?!?! Yikes. I thought hiro was overreacting, until I looked at the source of the HTML MIME part. Wow. That's Office-grade shit. Horribly verbose, and only aimed at a specific subset of browsers: span

Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-03-31 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On 1 Apr 2011, at 3:19 am, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, hiro wrote: I just looked at the source and what is this shit?!?! Yikes. I thought hiro was overreacting, until I looked at the source of the HTML MIME part. Wow. That's Office-grade shit. Horribly verbose,